The authors examine family as an institution of governance in American welfare provision in nineteenth-century poor laws and the twenty-first-century earned income tax credit. Their study demonstrates family’s important role achieving public policy aims, illustrates the extent to which governments have relied on nongovernmental actors, describes the tools they use, and shows how citizens’ relationship to the state is translated back through nongovernmental institutions. Called upon in the task of governing, family—the hallmark of the private sphere—illustrates the mechanisms that governments use and the extent of governing authority necessary to get actors to comply with policy aims.
Basch, Norma.1982. In the eyes of the law: Women, marriage, and property in nineteenth-century New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
Basch, Norma.1999. Framing American divorce: From the revolutionary generation to the Victorians. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Benton, Josiah.1911. Warning out in New England. Boston : W. B. Clarke.
4.
Bittker, Boris I.1975. Federal income taxation and the family. Stanford Law Review27:1389-1463.
5.
Blackstone, William.1765/1979. Commentaries on the laws of England . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Blendon, Robert J., Stephen R. Pelletier, Marcus D. Rosenbaum, and Mollyann Brodie .2003. Tax uncertainty: A divided America’s unformed view of the federal tax system. Brookings Review21 (3): 28-31.
7.
Brown, Michael K.1999. Race, money, and the American welfare state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
A compilation of the poor laws of the State of Pennsylvania from the year 1700 to 1788, Inclusive. 1971. New York: Arno.
9.
Cott, Nancy F.2000. Public vows: A history of marriage and the nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Fineman, Martha.1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge .
11.
Gerring, John.2007. Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Goldsmith, Stephen, and William D. Eggers .2004. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
Gottschalk, Marie.2000. The shadow welfare state: Labor, business, and the politics of health care in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Hacker, Jacob S.2002. The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hartog, Hendrik.2000. Man and wife in America: A history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Herndon, Ruth.2001. Unwelcome Americans: Living on the margin in early New England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
Hirshey, Gerri.2007. Teenagers and cars: A deadly mix. New York Times, December 9.
18.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks.2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review97:233-43.
19.
Howard, Christopher.1997. The hidden welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Howard, Christopher.2002. Tax expenditures. In The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, ed. L. M. Salamon , 410-44. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Howell, William G.2004. Dynamic selection effects in means-tested, urban school voucher programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23:225-50.
22.
Howlett, Michael.2000. Managing the "hollow state": Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration43:412-32.
23.
Internal Revenue Service.2003. Data book, fiscal year 2002. Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service.
24.
Internal Revenue Service.2009a. Data book, fiscal year 2008. Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service.
25.
Internal Revenue Service.2009b. Earned income credit (EIC). Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service.
26.
Johnson, Kimberley S.2006. Governing the American state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink .1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
28.
Kelso, Robert.1922. The history of poor relief in Massachusetts, 1620-1820 . New York: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
Kent, James.1867. Commentaries on American law. Boston : Little Brown.
30.
Kersh, Rogan, and James Monroe.2002. How the personal becomes political: Prohibitions, public obesity, and health. Studies in American Political Development16:162-75.
31.
Kettl, Donald F.1993. Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Kettl, Donald F.2000. The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review60:488-97.
33.
Klein, Jennifer.2003. For all these rights: Business, labor, and the shaping of America’s public-private welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Kornhauser, Marjorie E.1993. Love, money, and the IRS: Family, income-sharing, and the joint income tax return. Hastings Law Journal45 (63): 63-111.
35.
Locke, John.1959. An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. A. Fraser.New York: Dover.
36.
Locke, John.1988. Two treatises of government. Ed. P. Laslett.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lynn, Laurence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill .2001. Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
Macedo, Stephen, and Iris Marion Young, eds. 2003. Child, family, and state: NOMOS XLIV. New York: New York University Press.
39.
Manna, Paul.2006. School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
40.
Marshall, T.H.1950. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Mettler, Suzanne.1998. Dividing citizens: Gender and federalism in New Deal public policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss.2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics2 (1): 55-73.
43.
Mink, Gwendolyn.1995. The wages of motherhood: Inequality in the welfare state, 1917-1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
44.
National Survey of Americans’ Views on Taxes. 2003. National Public Radio/Kaiser Family Foundation/ Kennedy School of Government, February 5.
45.
Novak, William J.2003. The legal transformation of citizenship in nineteenth-century America. In The democratic experiment: New directions in political history, ed. M. Jacobs, W. J. Novak, and J. E. Zelizar, 85-119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Novkov, Julie.2008. Racial union: Law, intimacy, and the White state in Alabama, 1865-1954. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
Orren, Karen.1991. Belated feudalism: Labor, the law and political development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Page, Henry.1850. A view of the law relative to the subject of divorce in Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan. Columbus, OH: J. H. Riley.
49.
Pateman, Carole.1988. The sexual contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Patterson, Jacqueline, and Laura Cox.2001. How social workers can link children to free and low-cost health insurance. Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
51.
Peck, Epaphroditus.1921. The law of persons and domestic relations. 2nd ed. Chicago: Callaghan .
52.
Peters, B. Guy, and John Pierre.1998. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8:223-43.
53.
Peters, B. Guy, and Donald J. Savoie.1995. Governance in a changing environment. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
54.
Rabkin, Peggy.1980. Fathers to daughters: The legal foundations of female emancipation. Westport, CT: Greenwood .
55.
Rhodes, R.A.W.1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political StudiesXLIV:652-67.
56.
Rodgers, W.C.1899. A treatise on the law of domestic relations. Chicago: T. H. Flood.
57.
Salamon, Lester M.2002. The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In The tools of government: A guide to new governance , ed. L. M. Salamon, 1-47. New York : Oxford University Press.
58.
Schouler, James.1870. A treatise on the law of the domestic relations. Boston: Little Brown.
59.
Schouler, James.1882. A treatise on the law of husband and wife. Boston: Little Brown.
60.
Simon, Jonathan.2007. Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York : Oxford University Press.
61.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie.2004. A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
Smith, Anna Marie.2007. Welfare reform and sexual regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Stevens, Beth.1988. Blurring the boundaries: How the federal government has influenced welfare benefits in the private sector. In The politics of social policy in the United States, ed. M. Weir, A. S. Orloff, and T. Skocpol, 123-48. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
Strach, Patricia.2007. All in the family: The private roots of American public policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
Surrey, Stanley S.1973. Pathways to tax reform: The concept of tax expenditures . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
Tomlins, Christopher.1993. Law, labor, and ideology in the early American republic . New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Tronto, Joan C.1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for the ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
68.
Young, Iris Marion.1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.2008. The earned income tax credit program has made advances; however, alternatives to traditional compliance methods are needed to stop billions of dollars in erroneous payments. Washington, DC: Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
