This article forwards a new postmaterialist trigger theory (PTT) of the origins of bills of rights in stable, advanced democracies. Socially, such projects are linked to the postmaterialist growth of “cultural left” forces such as civil libertarians and social equality seekers. Additionally, a focusing trigger providing an immediate political rationale for change is also generally required. This trigger determines the precise timing of any change and also influences its shape. Such a trigger need not be strategic or prospective in nature. Instead, political elites may embrace bill of rights genesis as part of a backward-looking “aversive” reaction to prior negative political experiences during opposition.
Beetham, David.1989. Civil liberties, Thatcherism, and Charter ’88. Political Quarterly60 (3): 273-79.
2.
Blackburn, Robert, ed. 1999. Towards a constitutional bill of rights for the United Kingdom. London: Pinter.
3.
Bork, Robert H.2002. Coercing virtue: The worldwide rule of judges. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
4.
Canadian House of Commons Special Committee on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1960. Minutes of proceedings and evidence [and final report to House]. Ottawa, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
5.
Clarkson, Stephen, and Christina McCall .1990. Trudeau and our times, vol. I, The magnificent obsession. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart Inc.
6.
Cook, Robin, and Robert Maclennan , eds. 2005. Looking back- Looking forward : The Cook-Maclennan Agreement, eight years on. London : New Politics Network.
7.
Dale, Ian, ed. 2000. British political party manifestos, 1900-1997. London: Routledge/Politico’s Publishing.
8.
Dyson, Brian.1994. Liberty in Britain: 1934-94; diamond jubilee history of the National Council for Civil Liberties. London: Civil Liberties Trust.
9.
Elkins, David J., and Richard Simeon.1980. Small worlds: Provinces and parties in Canadian political life. Toronto, Canada: Methuen.
10.
Epp, Charles.1998. The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Erdos, David.2007. Aversive constitutionalism in the Westminster world: The genesis of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. International Journal of Constitutional Law5 (2): 343-69.
12.
Erdos, David.2008. Elite supply "blockages" and the failure of national bill of rights genesis in Australia: A comparative Westminster analysis. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics46 (3): 341-64.
13.
Evans, Mark.1995. Charter 88: A successful challenge to the British political tradition?Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth .
14.
Evans, Mark.2003. Constitution-making and the Labour Party. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
Ewing, K.D.1999. The Human Rights Act and parliamentary democracy. Modern Law Review62:79-99.
16.
Ewing, K.D., and Conor Gearty.1990. Freedom under Thatcher: Civil liberties in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
17.
Finkel, Jodi.2004. Judicial reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How electoral incentives shape institutional change. Latin American Research Review39 (3): 56-80.
18.
Foley, Conor.1994. Democracy and human rights in the UK. London: Liberty.
19.
Galligan, Brian.1990. Australia’s rejection of a bill of rights. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics28 (3): 344-68.
20.
Ginsburg, Tom.2002. Economic analysis and the design of constitutional courts . Theoretical Inquiries in Law3 (1): 1-37.
21.
Ginsburg, Tom.2003. Judicial review in new democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Government of Canada. 1969. The constitution and the people of Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
23.
Government of Canada. 1978. Constitutional reform: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Ottawa, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
24.
Hirschl, Ran.2000. The political origins of judicial empowerment through constitutionalization. Law and Social Inquiry25 (1): 91-147.
25.
Hirschl, Ran.2004. Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Hirst, Paul.1989. After Thatcher. London: Collins.
27.
Howe, Martin.2002. The decline of liberty. In Conservative debatesLiberty under the law, ed. Oliver Letwin, John Marenbon, and Martin How. London: Politeia.
28.
Inglehart, Ronald.1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Institute of Public Policy Research. 1990. A British bill of rights. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
30.
Institute of Public Policy Research. 1991. The Constitution of the United Kingdom. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
31.
Jackson, Donald W.1997. The United Kingdom confronts the European Convention on Human Rights. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
32.
Klug, Franscesca.1991. A peoples’ charter: Liberty’s bill of rights: A consultation document. London: National Council for Civil Liberties.
33.
Klug, Franscesca.2000. Values for a godless age: The story of the UK’s new bill of rights. London: Penguin .
34.
Labour Party (Great Britain). 1993. A new agenda for democracy: Labour’s proposals for constitutional reform . London: Labour Party.
35.
Labour Party (Great Britain). 1996. Bringing rights home. London: Labour Party.
36.
Lester, Anthony.2004a. History and context. In Human rights: Law and practice , ed. Anthony Lester and David Pannick. London: LexisNexis.
37.
Lester, Anthony.2004b. The Home Office again. In Roy Jenkins: A retrospective, ed. Andrew Adonis and Keith Thomas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
MacLennan, Christopher.2003. Towards the Charter: Canadians and the demand for a national bill of rights, 1929-1960. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
39.
Maclennan, Robert.2005. The 1997 Constitutional Compact- And after. In Looking back, looking forward: The Cook-Maclennan Agreement, eight years on , ed. Robin Cook and Robert Maclennan.London: New Politics Network.
40.
Mandelson, Peter, and Roger Liddle.1996. The Blair revolution. London: Faber & Faber.
41.
McRoberts, Kenneth.1988. Quebec: Social change and political crisis. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
42.
McWhinney, E.1982. Canada and the constitution 1979-1982. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
43.
Minkin, Louis.1992. The contentious alliance: Trade unions and the Labour Party. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
44.
Morton, F.L., and Rainer Knopff.2000. The charter revolution and the court party. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
45.
National Council for Civil Liberties. 1980. Annual report. London: National Council for Civil Liberties.
46.
Sneiderman, Paul M., Joseph F. Fletcher, Peter H. Russell, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1996. The clash of rights: Liberty, equality and legitimacy in pluralist democracy. London: Yale University Press.
47.
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada, Parliament of Canada. 1980-81a. Minutes of proceedings and evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
48.
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada, Parliament of Canada. 1980-81b. Submissions received. Archival material held at National Archives, Ottawa, Canada, RG14, Records of Parliament, Accession Number: 1990-91/119/59-73.
49.
Thornton, Peter.1989. Decade of decline: Civil liberties in the Thatcher years . London: Liberty.
50.
Trudeau, Pierre. [1964] 1996. Against the current-Selected writings 1939-1996. Edited by Gérard Pelletier. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
51.
Wallington, Peter, and Jeremy McBride.1976. Civil liberties and a bill of rights . London: Cobden Trust.
52.
Weinrib, Lorraine.1998. Trudeau and theCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A question of constitutional maturation. In Trudeau’s shadow: The life and legacy of Pierre Elliot Trudeau, ed. Andrew Cohen and J. L. Granatstein. Toronto, Canada: Random House of Canada .
53.
Weinrib, Lorraine.1999. Canada’s constitutional revolution: From legislative to constitutional state. Israel Law Review33 (1): 13-50.
54.
Weinrib, Lorraine.2002. Canada’s Charter: Comparative influences, international stature. In The Charter at twenty: Law and practice, ed. Debra M. McAllister and Adam M. Dodek.Toronto, Canada: Ontario Bar Association.
