This article offers a comparative review of seven rule of law measures. It demonstrates that the measures differ in both form and appropriateness and that the differences have consequences for the empirical results. The shortcomings are, among others, restrictions in scope and availability of disaggregate data, insufficient codebooks, and unjustified aggregation procedures. In most cases, the task of conceptualization is not grounded in theory, and key principles of the rule of law are left out while more inappropriate elements are included. These findings suggest that more precaution is required in the construction and employment of rule of law measures.
Andrews, Josephine T., and Gabriella R. Montinola .2004. Veto players and the rule of law in emerging democracies. Comparative Political Studies37:55-87.
2.
Arndt, Christiane, and Charles Oman.2006. The uses and abuses of governance indicators . Paris: OECD Publishing .
3.
Barro, Robert.1997. Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
4.
Barro, Robert.2000. Rule of law, democracy, and economic performance . In 2000 index of economic freedom, ed. Gerald P. O’Driscoll Jr., Kim R. Holmes, and Melanie Kirkpatrick , 31-49. Washington and New York: Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal.
5.
Belton, Rachel K.2005. Competing definitions of the rule of law: Implications for practitioners (Carnegie Papers No. 55). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
6.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1993. Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science37:1207-30.
7.
Carothers, Thomas.1998. The rule of law revival. Foreign Affairs77:95-106.
8.
Eisenberg, Melvin A.1988. The nature of the common law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Fallon, Richard.1997. "The rule of law" as a concept in constitutional discourse . Columbia Law Review97:1-56.
10.
Finnis, John.1980. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford , UK: Clarendon.
11.
Fuller, Lon L.1969. The morality of law. New Haven : Yale University Press.
12.
Goertz, Gary.2006. Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
13.
Haggard, Stephan, Andrew MacIntyre, and Lydia Tiede.2008. The rule of law and economic development . Annual Review of Political Science11:205-34.
14.
Hayek, Friedrich A.1973. Law, legislation, and liberty. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
15.
HiiL.2007. Rule of law: Inventory report. http://www.hiil.org/uploads/File/1-947-Rule_of_Law_Inventory_Report_2007.pdf (accessed May 1, 2009).
16.
Iqbal, Kazi, and Anwar Shah.2008. How do worldwide indicators measure up?http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/Howdoworldwidegovernanceindicatorsmeasureup.pdf (accessed May 1, 2009).
17.
Joireman, Sandra F.2001. Inherited legal systems and effective rule of law: Africa and the colonial legacy. Journal of Modern African Studies39:571-96.
18.
Joireman, Sandra F.2004. Colonization and the rule of law: Comparing the effectiveness of common law and civil law countries. Constitutional Political Economy15:315-38.
19.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kray, and Massimo Mastruzzi .2007a. The worldwide governance indicators: Answering the critics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4149. Washington, DC : World Bank.
20.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kray, and Massimo Mastruzzi .2007b. Growth and governance: A reply. Journal of Politics69: 555-62.
21.
Knack, Stephen.2006. Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A critique of the cross-country indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3968. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22.
Kurtz, Marcus, and Andrew Schrank.2007. Growth and governance: A defense. Journal of Politics69:563-69.
23.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny.1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization15:222-79.
24.
Lauth, Hans-Joachim.2001. Rechtsstaat, Rechtssysteme und Demokratie. In Rechtsstaat und Demokratie, ed. Michael Becker , Hans-Joachim Lauth, and Gert Pickel, 21-44. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
25.
Linz, Juan.1997. Democracy today: An agenda for students of democracy . Scandinavian Political Studies20:115-34.
26.
Munck, Gerardo.2009. Measuring democracy: A bridge between scholarship and politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Munck, Gerardo, and Jay Verkuilen .2002. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies35:5-34.
28.
Raworth, Kate.2001. Measuring human rights. Ethics and International Affairs15:111-31.
29.
Raz, Joseph.1979. The authority of law: Essays on law and morality . Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
30.
Rigobon, Roberto, and Dani Rodrick.2005. Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income. Economics of Transitions13:533-64.
31.
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio, and Jeffrey K. Staton .2008. Unpacking the rule of law: A review of judicial independence measures. IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series (Political Concepts No. 21). Mexico, DF: International Political Science Association .
32.
Sampford, Charles, Arthur Shacklock, Carmel Connors, and Fredrik Galtung .2006. Measuring corruption. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
33.
Tamanaha, Brian.2008The dark side of the relationship between the rule of law and liberalism. New York University Journal of Law and Liberty3:516-47.
34.
The Economist.2008. Economics and the rule of law. March 13.
35.
Thomas, Melissa.2007. What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1007527 (accessed May 1, 2009).
36.
Trebilcock, Michael, and Ronald Daniels.2008. Rule of law reform and development . Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar .
37.
Vanhanen, Tatu.1997. Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries . London: Routledge.
38.
Waldron, Jeremy.2002. Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida). Law and Philosophy21: 137-64.
39.
Williams, Andrew, and Abu Siddique .2008. The use (and abuse) of governance indicators in economics: A review. Economics of Governance9:131-75.
