Can neuroscientific techniques shed light on important questions in political science? The author argues for increased dialogue across disciplines as wide ranging as evolutionary psychology and biology, biological anthropology, behavioral economics, behavior genetics, behavioral ecology, and cognitive neuroscience. These fields find a clear theoretical convergence around evolutionary development models. These paradigms can be applied successfully to political decision making. In turn, political scientists can offer significant contributions to this research agenda by posing critical questions concerning human social and political behavior, including bias against out-groups, the formation and maintenance of coalitions, and the origin of preferences in decision making.
Adolphs, Ralph, Hanna Damasio, Daniel Tranel, Greg Cooper, and Antonio Damasio .2000. A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience20 (7): 2683-90.
2.
Alford, John, Carolyn Funk, and John Hibbing.2005. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review99 (2): 153-67.
3.
Beer, Jennifer, Jason Mitchell, and Kevin Ochsner.2006. Multiple perspectives on the psychological and neural basis of social cognition. Brain Research1079 (1): 1-3.
4.
Bowles, Sam.2006. Group competition, reproductive leveling, and the evolution of human altruism. Science314 (5805): 1569-72.
Cabeza, Roberto, and Lars Nyberg.2000. Neural basis of learning and memory: Functional neuroimaging evidence. Current Opinion in Neurology13 (4): 415-21.
7.
Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes.1960. The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Choi, Jing-Kyoo, and Sam Bowles.2007. The coevolution of parochialism and altruism and war. Science318 (5850): 636-40.
9.
Cunningham, William, Marcia Johnson, Carol Raye, Chris Gatenby, John Gore, and Mahzarin Banaji .2004. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science15 (12): 806-13.
10.
Estes, R., J. Jerger, and G. Jacobson.2002. Reversal of hemispheric asymmetry in auditory tasks in children who are poor listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology13 (2): 59-71.
11.
Fiske, Susan, Juan Xu, Amy Cuddy, and Peter Glick.1999. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues55 (3): 473-89.
12.
Gilbert, Daniel, E. Pinel, Timothy Wilson, S. Blumberg, and T. Wheatley.1998. Immune neglect: A sources of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75 (3): 617-38.
13.
Hart, Allen J., Paul J. Whalen, Lisa M. Shin, Sean C. McInerney, Hakan Fischer, and Scott L. Rauch .2000. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport11 (11): 2351-54.
14.
Huettel, Scott, and Gregory McCarthy .2004. What is odd in the "oddball task"? Prefrontal cortex is activated by dynamic changes in response strategy . Neuropsychologia42 (3): 379-86.
15.
Isen, Alice, Thomas Nygren, and Greg Ashby.1988. Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55 (5): 710-17.
16.
Johnson, Kareem, and Barbara Fredrickson .2005. We all look the same to me: Positive emotions eliminate the own race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science16 (11): 875-81.
17.
Johnson, Marnie.2002. Vantage theory meets cognitive psychology: A synthesis with frame theory. Language Sciences24 (5/6): 639-65.
18.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky.1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47:313-27.
19.
Krendl, Anne, C. NeilMacrae, WilliamM. Kelley, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, and Todd F. Heatherton .2006. The good, the bad, and the ugly: An fMRI investigation of the functional anatomiccorrelates of stigma . Social Neuroscience1:5-15.
20.
Krendl, Anne, Jennifer A. Richeson, William M. Kelley, and Todd F. Heatherton .2008. The negative consequences of threat: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women’s underperformance in math. Psychological Science19 (2): 168-75.
21.
Kurzban, R., and Mark Leary.2001. Evolutionary Origins of Stigmatization: The Functions of Social Exclusion. Psychological Review, 127(2): 187-208
22.
Kurzban, Robert, John Tooby, and Leda Cosmdies.2001. Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98 (26): 15387-392.
23.
Logothetis, Nikos, Jon Pauls, Mark Augath, Torsten Trinath, and Axel Oeltermann .2001. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature412:150-57.
24.
Markman, Arthur, Todd Maddox, and Darrell Worthy.2006. Choking and excelling under pressure . Psychological Science17 (11): 944-48.
25.
McDermott, Rose.2004. The feeling of rationality. Perspectives on Politics2:691-706.
26.
Mellers, Barbara.2000. Choice and the relative pleasure of outcomes. Psychological Bulletin126 (6): 910-24.
27.
Miller, Michael B., Alan Kingstone, and Michael S. Gazzaniga .2002. Hemispheric encoding asymmetries are more apparent than real. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience14 (5): 702-708.
28.
Miller, Michael B., John Van Horn, George L. Wolford, Todd C. Handy, Monica Valsangkar-Smyth, Souheil Inati, Scott Grafton, and Michael S. Gazzaniga .2002. Extensive individual differences in brain activations during episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience14 (8): 1200-14.
29.
Mitchell, Jason, Mahzarin Banaji, and Neil MacCrae.2005. The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17:1306-15.
30.
Nisbett, Richard, and Timothy Wilson.1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84 (3): 231-59.
31.
Ohman, Arne, and Susan Mineka.2001. Fears, phobias and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review108 (3): 483-522.
32.
Oxley, Douglas R., Kevin B. Smith, Matthew V. Hibbing, Jennifer L. Miller, John R. Alford, Peter K. Hatemi, and John R. Hibbing .2008. Political attitudes are predicted by physiological traits. Science321 (5896): 1667-70.
33.
Phelps, Elizabeth, Kevin O’Connor, Christopher Gatenby, John Gore, Christian Grillon, and Michael Davis.2001. Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nature Neuroscience4:437-41.
34.
Robson, Arthur.2001. Why would nature give individuals utility functions? Journal of Political Economy109 (4): 900-14.
35.
Shiv, Baba, George Loewenstein, and Antoine Bechara .2005. The dark side of emotion in decision-making: When individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions. Cognitive Brain Research23 (1): 85-92.
36.
Shiv, Baba, George Loewenstein, Antoine B echara, Hanna Damasio, and Antonio Damasio .2005. Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychological Science16 (6): 435-39.
37.
Steele, Claude.1997. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. The American psychologist52(6): 613-629.
38.
Thayer, Bradley.2000. Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary theory, realism and international politics. International Security25 (2): 124-51.
39.
van den Bos, Wouter, Samuel M. McClure, Lasana T. Harris, Susan T. Fiske, and Jonathan D. Cohen .2007. Dissociating affective evaluation and social cognitive processes in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience7 (4): 337-46.
40.
Zaller, Jonathan.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
