Political jurisdictions have incentives to promote pollution spillovers to capture the benefits of economic production within their borders while exporting the environmental costs to their neighbors. The authors examine the extent to which U.S. states engage in this type of free-riding behavior. Studying enforcement of the federal Clean Air Act from 1990 through 2000, the authors employ zero-inflated negative binomial regression to predict the number of state-initiated enforcement actions conducted in counties bordering other jurisdictions. They find that states perform fewer enforcement actions in counties adjacent to international borders but no evidence that states conduct less enforcement in counties that border other states.
Bui, Linda T. M.1998. Gains from trade and strategic interaction: Equilibrium acid rain abatement in the eastern United States and Canada. American Economic Review88:984-1001.
2.
Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi .1998. Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Dasgupta, Susmita, Benoit LaPlante, Nlandu Mamingi, and Hua Wang.2000. Industrial environmental performance in China: The impact of inspections. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2285.
4.
Davis, Charles, and Sandra K. Davis .1999. State enforcement of the federal hazardous waste program. Polity31:450-68.
5.
Deily, Mary E., and Wayne B. Gray .2007. Agency structure and firm culture: OSHA, EPA, and the steel industry. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization23:685-709.
6.
Delli Santi, Angela.2006. State to sue over pollution from Pa. Philadelphia Inquirer, December 8, 2006.
7.
Dion, Catherine, Paul Lanoie, and Benoit LaPlante .1998. Monitoring of pollution regulation: Do local conditions matter? Journal of Regulatory Economics13:5-18.
8.
Gray, Wayne B., and Mary E. Deily .1996. Compliance and enforcement: Air pollution regulation in the U.S. steel industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management31:96-111.
9.
Gray, Wayne B. and Ronald J. Shadbegian.2004. "Optimal" pollution abatement: Whose benefits matter, and how much?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management47:510-34.
10.
---. 2007. The environmental performance of polluting plants: A spatial analysis. Journal of Regional Science47:63-84.
11.
Greene, William H.1994. Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models. Working Paper No. EC-94-10, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.
12.
Guber, Deborah Lynn.2003. The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Hedge, David M.1993. A spatial model of regulation. American Politics Quarterly21:387-409.
14.
Helland, Eric.1998a. The enforcement of pollution control laws: Inspections, violations, and self-reporting. Review of Economics and Statistics80:141-53.
15.
---. 1998b. The revealed preferences of state EPAs: Stringency, enforcement, and substitution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management35:242-61.
16.
Helland, Eric, and Andrew B. Whitford .2003. Pollution incidence and political jurisdiction: Evidence from TRI. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management46:403-24.
17.
Hutchinson, Emma, and Peter W. Kennedy .2008. State enforcement of federal standards: Implications for interstate pollution. Resource and Energy Economics30:316-44.
18.
Kahn, Matthew E.1999. The silver lining of rust belt manufacturing decline. Journal of Urban Economics46:360-76.
19.
King, Gary.1988. Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science32:838-63.
20.
Konisky, David M.2007. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom?American Journal of Political Science51:853-72.
21.
Konisky, David M., Jeffrey Milyo, and Lilliard E. Richardson Jr.2008. Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly89:1066-85.
22.
Lambert, Diane.1992. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics34:1-14.
23.
Lester, James P.1986. New federalism and environmental policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism16:149-65.
24.
Long, Scott J.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
25.
Murdoch, James C. and Todd Sandler.1997a. Voluntary cut-backs and pretreaty behavior: The Helsinki Protocol and sulfur emissions. Public Finance Review25:139-62.
26.
---. 1997b. The voluntary provision of a pure public good: The case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal Protocol. Journal of Public Economics63:331-49.
27.
Murdoch, James C., Todd Sandler, and Keith Sargent.1997. A tale of two collectives: Sulphur versus nitrogen oxides emission reduction in Europe. Economica64:281-307.
28.
Oates, Wallace E.2001. A reconsideration of environmental federalism. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 01-54.
29.
Potoski, Matthew.2001. Clean air federalism: Do states race to the bottom? Public Administration Review61:335-42.
30.
Potoski, Matthew and Neal D. Woods.2002. Dimensions of state environmental policies: Air pollution regulation in the United States. Policy Studies Journal30:208-27.
31.
Revesz, Richard L.1996. Federalism and interstate environmental externalities . University of Pennsylvania Law Review144:2341-2416.
32.
---. 1997. Federalism and environmental regulation: A normative critique . In The new federalism: Can the states be trusted? ed. John Ferejohn and Barry R. Weingast, 97-128. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
33.
Ringquist, Evan J.1993. Environmental protection at the state level: Politics and progress in controlling pollution. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
34.
---. 2004. Environmental justice. In Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices, and opportunities, ed. R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino , and R. O’Leary, 255-87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Scholz, John T., and Feng Heng Wei .1986. Regulatory enforcement in a federalist system. American Political Science Review80:1249-70.
36.
Sigman, Hilary.2002. International spillovers and water quality in rivers: Do countries free ride? American Economic Review92:1152-59.
37.
---. 2005. Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management50:82-101.
38.
Silva, Emilson C. D., and Arthur J. Caplan .1997. Transboundary pollution control in federal systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management50:82-101.
39.
Smith, Zachary, and Katrina Darlene Taylor.2007. Transborder air pollution . In Handbook of globalization and the environment, ed. Khi V.Thi, Dianne Rahm, and Jerrell D. Coggburn , 61-76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
40.
U.S. General Accounting Office.2000. Environmental protection: More consistency needed among EPA regions in approach to enforcement. GAO/RCED-00-108. Washington, D.C.: Author.
41.
U.S. Government Accountability Office.2006 . Environmental compliance and enforcement: EPA’s effort to improve and make more consistent its compliance and enforcement activities. GAO-06-840T. Washington D. C.: Author.
42.
Vuong, Quang H.1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica57:307-33.
43.
Wood, B. Dan.1991. Federalism and policy responsiveness: The clean air case . Journal of Politics53:851-59.
44.
---. 1992. Modeling federal implementation as a system: The clean air case. American Journal of Political Science36 (1): 40-67.
45.
Woods, Neal D.2006a. Interstate competition and environmental regulation: A test of the race to the bottom thesis. Social Science Quarterly87:174-89.
46.
Woods, Neal D.2006b. Primacy implementation of environmental policy in the U.S. states. Publius: The Journal of Federalism36:259-76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
