The mass media’s representation of campaign discourse influences whether voters have the opportunity to scrutinize the candidates’ issue priorities and policy proposals. But it is not clear whether candidate and media issue emphases are more or less similar at an election’s most consequential moments—when it is competitive. In a study of the 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns, the author finds that as the polls narrow, the media are less likely to reflect candidate discourse. Paradoxically, voters are deprived of an accurate representation of candidate dialogue when they need it most, with media behavior making it difficult for citizens to cast informed ballots in close contests. The results also show that whether the media serve as a conduit for, or filter of, candidate messages depends on a variety of factors, especially electoral context.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar.1994. Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns . Public Opinion Quarterly58:334-57.
2.
Arterton, F. Christopher.1984. Media politics. Lexington, MA : Lexington Books.
3.
Banerjee, M., M. Capozzoli, L. McSweeney, and D. Sinha.1999. Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics27:3-23.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz .1995. What to do (and not to do) with times-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89:634-47.
5.
Benedetto, Richard.2004. Bush advocates electronic medical record-keeping . USA Today. May 27.
6.
Bennett, W. Lance.1990. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40:103-25.
7.
Bennett, W. Lance.1996. An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication13:373-84.
8.
Bennett, W. Lance.2009. News: The politics of illusion. 8th ed. New York: Pearson Longman .
9.
Bennett, W. Lance, Regina Lawrence, and Steven Livingston .2007. When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
10.
Bruni, Frank.2002. Ambling into history: The unlikely odyssey of George W. Bush. New York: HarperCollins .
11.
Budge, Ian, and Dennis J. Farlie .1983. Explaining and predicting elections: Issue-effects and party strategies in 23 democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
12.
Cook, Timothy E.2005. Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. 2nd ed. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
13.
D’Alessio, Dave, and Mike Allen.2000. Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication50:133-56.
14.
Dalton, Russell J., Paul Allen Beck, Robert Huckfeldt, and William Koetzle .1998. A test of media-centered agenda setting: Newspaper content and public interests in a presidential election . Political Communication15:463-81.
15.
Druckman, James N.2004. Priming the vote. Political Psychology25:577-94.
16.
Druckman, James N.2005. Media matter: How newspapers and television news cover campaigns and influence voters. Political Communication22:463-81.
17.
Dwyer, Paul, and Amy Borrus.1996. Frantically ducking donorgate. Business Week3501:36.
18.
Farhi, Paul.2004. For media on campaign trail, little access to candidates . Washington Post. September 16, A9.
19.
Farnsworth, Stephen J. and S. Robert Lichter.2007. The nightly news nightmare: Network television’s coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2004. 2nd ed. New York: Row-man & Littlefield .
20.
Fenno, Richard F.1996. Senators on the campaign trail. Norman : University of Oklahoma Press.
21.
Flowers, Julianne F., Audrey A. Haynes, and Michael H. Crespin .2003. The media, the campaign, and the message. American Journal of Political Science47:259-73.
22.
Geer, John G.1998. Campaigns, party competition, and political advertising . In Politicians and party politics, ed. John G. Geer, 186-217. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King.1993. Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?British Journal of Political Science23:409-51.
24.
Gilliam, Frank.1985. Influences on voter turnout for U.S. House elections in non-presidential years. Legislative Studies Quarterly10:339-51.
25.
Gimpel, James G., Karen M. Kaufmann, and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz.2007. Battleground states versus blackout states: The behavioral implications of modern presidential campaigns . Journal of Politics69:786-97.
26.
Goldman, Peter, Thomas M. DeFrank, Mark Miller, Andrew Murr, and Tom Mathews .1994. Quest for the presidency 1992. College Station: Texas A&M .
27.
Graber, Doris A.2006. Mass media and American politics. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
28.
Hart, Gary.1994. Why our media miss the message. In Politics and the media, ed. Richard Davis , 217-219. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Hayes, Danny.2008a. Does the messenger matter? Candidate-media agenda convergence and its effects on voter issue salience. Political Research Quarterly61:134-46.
30.
Hayes, Danny.2008b. Party reputations, journalistic expectations: How issue ownership influences election news. Political Communication25:377-400.
31.
Hill, David, and Seth C. McKee .2005. The electoral college, mobilization, and turnout in the 2000 presidential election. American Politics Research33:700-25.
32.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder .1987. News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Iyengar, Shanto, Helmut Norpoth, and Kyu S. Hahn .2004. Consumer demand for election news: The horse race sells. Journal of Politics66:157-75.
34.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Paul Waldman.2003. The press effect. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Just, Marion, Ann N. Crigler, Dean E. Alger, Timothy E. Cook, Montague Kern, and Darrell M. West .1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney .1999. The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Kirkpatrick, David.2008. Abortion issue again dividing Catholic votes. New York Times. September 17, A1.
38.
Lipsitz, Keena. Forthcoming. The consequences of battleground and "spectator" state residency for political participation. Political Behavior.
39.
Miller, Joanne M. and Jon A. Krosnick.2000. News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science , 44:295-309.
40.
Nagourney, Adam.2004. The week ahead; Politics. New York Times . May 9.
41.
Patterson, Thomas E.1994. Out of order. New York: Vintage. Petrocik , John R.1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40:825-50.
42.
Petrocik, John R., William L. Benoit, and Glenn J. Hansen .2003-04. Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly118:599-626.
43.
Racicot, Marc.2004. Angry Democrats strike again. E-mail to Bush-Cheney 2004 Campaign listserver, June 1.
44.
Ridout, Travis N., and Rob Mellen, Jr.2007. Does the media agenda reflect the candidates’ agenda?Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12:44-62.
45.
Ridout, Travis N., and Glen R. Smith .2008. Free advertising: How the media amplify campaign messages. Political Research Quarterly61:598-608.
46.
Schudson, Michael.1996. The power of news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Semetko, Holli A., Jay G. Blumler, Michael Gurevitch, and David H. Weaver .1991. The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis of party and media roles in recent American and British elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Shaw, Daron R.1999. The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review93:345-61.
49.
Shogan, Robert.2001. Bad news: Where the press goes wrong in the making of the president. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
50.
Sides, John.2007. The consequences of campaign agendas. American Politics Research35:465-88.
51.
Sigal, Leon V.1973. Reporters and officials. Lexington, MA: Heath.
52.
Sigelman, Lee, and Emmett H. Buell , Jr.2004. Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-2000. American Journal of Political Science48:650-61.
53.
Simon, Adam F.2002. The winning message: Candidate behavior, campaign discourse, and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Vavreck, Lynn.2006. High fidelity? Presidential campaign content, the lack of media accountability, and voters’ evaluations of candidates, 1952-2000 . Unpublished manuscript.
55.
Westlye, Mark C.1991. Senate elections and campaign intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
56.
Witcover, Jules.1999. No way to pick a president: How money and hired guns have debased American elections. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
57.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson .2002. The timeline of presidential election campaigns. Journal of Politics64:969-93.
58.
Wolak, Jennifer.2006. The consequences of presidential battleground strategies for citizen engagement. Political Research Quarterly59:353-61.
59.
Zaller, John.1999. A theory of media politics. Unpublished manuscript , University of California, Los Angeles.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
