This article examines how the splitting of counties into multiple congressional districts affects citizens’ abilities to recall House candidates, turnout, roll off their congressional vote, and cast straight-ticket ballots. We demonstrate that while voters living in the “short end of the split” are less likely to recall their House candidates, they do behave similarly at the ballot box to voters drawn into districts containing their natural community of interest. Our results suggest the Supreme Court’s traditional focus on population equality across congressional districts might be more appropriately administered in concert with respect for natural communities of interest such as counties.
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee .1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Blais, Andre.2006. What affects voter turnout?Annual Review of Political Science9:111-25.
3.
Butler, David, and Bruce Cain.1992. Congressional redistricting: Comparative and theoretical perspectives. New York: MacMillan.
4.
Canon, David T.1999. Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Canon, David T.2005. Race, redistricting, and the courts. In Redistricting in the new millennium, ed. Peter F. Galderisis, 87-118. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
6.
Carstens v. Lamm, 543 U.S. 68. 1982.
7.
Clarke, Peter, and Susan H. Evans.1983. Covering campaigns: Journalism in congressional elections. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz .1999. The reapportionment revolution and bias in U.S. congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science43:812-41.
9.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
10.
Duff, Brian, Michael J. Hanmer, Won-Ho Park, and Ismail K. White.2007. Good excuses: Understanding who votes with an improved turnout question. Public Opinion Quarterly71:67-90.
11.
Engstrom, Richard N.2005. District geography and voters. In Redistricting in the new millennium, ed. Peter F. Galderisis , 65-84. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
12.
Epstein, David, and Sharyn O’Halloran.1999. Measuring the electoral and policy impact of majority-minority voting districts. American Journal of Political Science43:367-95.
13.
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright.2005. Voters, candidates, and issues in congressional elections. In Congress reconsidered , ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 77-106. Washington, DC : CQ.
Glazer, Amihai, Bernard Grofman, and Marc Robbins.1987. Partisan and incumbency effects of 1970s congressional redistricting. American Journal of Political Science31:680-707.
16.
Hayes, Danny, and Seth C. McKee . n.d. The participatory effects of redistricting: Incumbency, information costs, and voter roll-off in U.S. House elections . Working paper. http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/dwhayes/redrawn_nov07.pdf (accessed March 26, 2008).
17.
Hill, Kevin A.1995. Does the creation of majority black districts aid Republicans? An analysis of the 1992 congressional elections in eight southern states. Journal of Politics57:384-401.
18.
Jacobson, Gary.1990. The electoral origin of divided government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Lacy, Dean, and Philip Paolino.1998. Downsian voting and the separation of powers. American Journal of Political Science42:1180-99.
20.
Lublin, David.1997. The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Lublin, David, and D. Stephen Voss .2000. Racial redistricting and realignment in southern state legislatures. American Journal of Political Science44:792-810.
22.
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins.1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Mann, Thomas E., and Bruce E. Cain, ed. 2005. Party lines: Competition, partisanship, and congressional redistricting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
McDonald, Michael P.2007. Regulating redistricting. PS: Political Science and Politics40 (4): 675-79.
25.
Niemi, Richard G., and John Deegan Jr.1978. A theory of political redistricting . American Political Science Review72:1304-23.
26.
Niemi, Richard G., Bernard Grofman, Carl Carlucci, and Thomas Hofeller .1990. Measuring compactness and the role of a compactness standard in a test for partisan and racial gerrymandering . Journal of Politics52:1155-81.
27.
Niemi, Richard G., Lynda W. Powell, and Patricia L. Bicknell .1986. The effects of congruity between community and district on salience of U.S. House candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly11:187-210.
28.
Ostdiek, Donald.1995. Congressional redistricting and district typologies . Journal of Politics57:533-43.
29.
Persily, Nathaniel.2005. Forty years in the political thicket: Judicial review of the redistricting process since Reynolds v. Sims. In Party lines: Competition, partisanship, and congressional redistricting, ed. Thomas E. Mann and Bruce E. Cain, 67-91. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
Petrocik, John R., and Scott W. Desposato .1998. The partisan consequences of majority-minority redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994. Journal of Politics60:613-33.
31.
Reock, Ernest C., Jr.1961. A note: Measuring compactness as a requirement of legislative appointment. Midwest Journal of Political Science5:70-74.
32.
Sapiro, Virginia, Steven J. Rosenstone, and the National Election Studies.2004. American National Election Studies Cumulative Data File, 1948-2004. Computer file ICPSR08475-v13. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies (producer), and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor). DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR08475.
33.
Schaffner, Brian F.2001. Legislators, activities, and local media: Linking "Hill styles" with "home styles."Paper read at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
34.
Schaffner, Brian F.2002. House members, legislative activities, and local coverage . PhD diss., Indiana University.
35.
Schaffner, Brian F., and Patrick Sellers .2003. The structural determinants of local congressional news coverage. Political Communication20:41-57.
36.
Shotts, Kenneth W.2001. The effect of majority-minority mandates on partisan gerrymandering . American Journal of Political Science45:120-35.
37.
Swain, John W., Stephen A. Borrelli, and Brian C. Reed. 1998. Partisan consequences of the post-1990 redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Science Quarterly51:945-67.
38.
Timpone, Richard J.1988. Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States . American Political Science Review92: 145-58.
39.
Vickrey, William.1961. On the prevention of gerrymandering. Political Science Quarterly76:105-10.
40.
Vinson, Danielle C.1997. Local media coverage of Congress and its members . PhD diss., Duke University.
41.
Wattenberg, Martin P., Ian McAllister, and Anthony Salvanto .2000. How voting is like taking an SAT test: An analysis of American voter rolloff. American Politics Quarterly28 (2): 234-50.
42.
Winburn, Jonathan.2008. The realities of redistricting: Following the rules and limiting gerrymandering in state legislative redistricting. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
43.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone.1980. Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
