In Brazil, police officers have increasingly competed in elections, mirroring expanded roles in government for coercive agents in cases such as the United States, the Philippines, and Mexico. In this paper, I develop a theory of how voters perceive these candidates. The symbol of the police officer represents the abstract idea of order and stability, more than just a crime fighter. Corruption scandals and insecurity in Brazil and Latin America have given rise to “order” in response to the chaos of politics as usual as a compelling electoral brand. I therefore expect that voters associate police officer candidates with strong, decisive leadership, social conservatism, a strong commitment to the rule of law, honesty in government, and a weak commitment to democracy. An image-based conjoint experiment fielded to a representative sample of Brazilian voters (N = 3,098) finds support for the theoretical framework, but respondents did not perceive the police officer candidate as less democratic than other professional profiles. The results help to inform our understanding of electoral politics in post-transition democratic regimes, demonstrating how armed agents of the state might remain popular and influential within the context of a consolidated democracy.
AhnenRonald E.2007. “The Politics of Police Violence in Democratic Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society49 (1): 141–164.
2.
AriasEnrique DesmondBarnesNicholas. 2017. “Crime and Plural Orders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.” Current Sociology65 (3):448–465.
3.
AtencioRebecca J.2014. Memory’s Turn: Reckoning with Dictatorship in Brazil. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4.
AtkesonLonna RaeHamelBrian T.. 2020. “Fit for the Job: Candidate Qualifications and Vote Choice in Low Information Elections.” Political Behavior42 (1): 59–82.
5.
AxJoseph. 2021. “Democrat Eric Adams wins New York City Mayoral Election.” Reuters.
6.
AzevedoVictoria. Bolsonaro não gosta de gente, gosta de policial, diz Lula. Folha de S.Paulo. 2022.
7.
BarabasJasonJeritJennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review104 (2): 226–242.
8.
BarnesTiffany D.BeaulieuEmily. 2019. “Women Politicians, Institutions, and Perceptions of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies52 (1): 134–167.
9.
BatesonRegina. 2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation.” The American Political Science Review106 (3): 570–587.
10.
BerinskyAdam J.MendelbergTali. 2005. “The Indirect Effects of Discredited Stereotypes in Judgments of Jewish Leaders.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 845–864. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00159.x.
11.
BerlattoFabiaCodatoAdrianoBolognesiBruno. 2016. Da polícia à política: explicando o perfil dos candidatos das Forças Repressivas de Estado à Câmara dos Deputados. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política21: 77–120.
12.
BittnerEgon. 1970. Functions of the Police in Modern Society. Chevy Chase, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
13.
BoasTaylor C.2014. “Pastor Paulo vs. Doctor Carlos: Professional Titles as Voting Heuristics in Brazil.” Journal of Politics in Latin America6 (2): 39–72.
14.
BonnerMichelle D.2013. “The Politics of Police Image in Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies45 (4): 669–694.
15.
BradfordBen. 2014. “Policing and Social Identity: Procedural Justice, Inclusion and Cooperation between Police and Public.” Policing and Society24 (1): 22–43. doi:10.1080/10439463.2012.724068.
16.
BradfordBenMurphyKristinaJacksonJonathan. 2014. “Officers As Mirrors Policing, Procedural Justice and the (Re)Production of Social Identity.” British Journal of Criminology54 (4): 527–550.
17.
BuenoSamira.2014. “Bandido bom é bandidomorto: a opção ideológico-institucional da política de segurança pública na manutenção de padrões de atuação violentos da polícia militar paulista.” Accepted 2014-03-19.
18.
CaldeiraTeresa P. R.JamesHolston. 1999. “Democracy and Violence in Brazil.” Comparative Studies in Society and History41 (4): 691–729.
19.
CaldeiraTeresa Pires do Rio. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Calif, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
20.
CalfanoBrian RobertDjupePaul A.. 2009. “God Talk: Religious Cues and Electoral Support.” Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 329–339.
21.
Camargo IsabelaFalcaoMárcio. 2022. “PRF descumpre ordem do TSE e para pelo menos 610 ônibus de eleitores em blitze; Moraes intima diretor-geral.” G1.
22.
CampbellLiz. 2008. “Criminal Justice and Penal Populism in Ireland.” Legal Studies28(4):559–573.
23.
CarnesNicholasSadinMeredith L.. 2015. “The “Mill Worker’s Son” Heuristic: How Voters Perceive Politicians from Working-Class Families—and How They Really Behave in Office.” The Journal of Politics77 (1): 285–298.
24.
CarnesNicholasLupuNoam. 2016. “Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class.” American Political Science Review110 (4): 832–844.
25.
Clarín.com. 2021. Video: El sorpresivo saludo de los policías bonaerenses a Patricia Bullrich. Section: Clarínpolitica.
26.
Câmara dosDeputados.2021. Quarentena para militares, policiais e juízes é excluída do novo Código Eleitoral - Notícias. Portal da Câmara dos Deputados.
27.
CostaArthur Trindade MaranhãoThompsonTimothy. 2011. Police Brutality in Brazil: Authoritarian Legacy or Institutional Weakness?Latin American Perspectives38 (5): 19–32.
28.
DavisDarren W.SilverBrian D.. 2004. “Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America.” American Journal of Political Science48 (1): 28–46.
29.
FlomHernán. The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
30.
Flores-MacíasGustavoZarkinJessica. Militarization and Perceptions of Law Enforcement in the Developing World: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Mexico. British Journal of Political Science2021; 52 (3): 1–21.
31.
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. 2022.
32.
FrancoAnnieMalhotraNeilSimonovitsGaborZigerellL. J.. 2017. “Developing Standards for Post-Hoc Weighting in Population-Based Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science4 (2): 161–172.
33.
GarridoMarco. 2020. “A Conjunctural Account of Upper- and Middle-Class Support for Rodrigo Duterte.” International Sociology35 (6): 651–673.
34.
GarridoMarco. 2021. “Democracy as Disorder: Institutionalized Sources of Democratic Ambivalence Among the Upper and Middle Class in Manila.” Social Forces99 (3): 1036–1059.
35.
GonzálezYanilda María. 2017. “What Citizens Can See of the State”: Police and the Construction of Democratic Citizenship in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology21(4): 494–511.
36.
GonzálezYanilda María. Authoritarian Police in Democracy: Contested Security in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GreenPaul E.KriegerAbba M.WindYoram (Jerry). 2001. “Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects.” Interfaces31 (3): S56–S73.
38.
GreenPaul E.RaoVithala R.. 1971. “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data.” Journal of Marketing Research8 (3): 355–363.
39.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22 (1): 1–30.
40.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael J.. 2006. “Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes toward International Trade.” International Organization60 (2): 469–498.
41.
HollandAlisha C.2013. ““Right on Crime? Conservative Party Politics and “Mano Dura” Policies in El Salvador.” Latin American Research Review48 (1): 44–67.
42.
HoriuchiYusakuSmithDaniel M.YamamotoTeppei. 2020. “Identifying Voter Preferences for Politicians’ Personal Attributes: a Conjoint Experiment in Japan.” Political Science Research and Methods8 (1): 75–91.
43.
ImbensGuido W.2010. “Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009).” Journal of Economic Literature48 (2): 399–423.
44.
JaffeRivke. 2013. “The Hybrid State: Crime and Citizenship in Urban Jamaica.” American Ethnologist40 (4): 734–748.
45.
JewkesYvonne. 2011. “Media & Crime: a Critical Introduction.” In Key Approaches to Criminology. 2nd ed.Los Angeles: Sage.
46.
KirklandPatricia A.CoppockAlexander. 2018. “Candidate Choice Without Party Labels.” Political Behavior40 (3): 571–591.
47.
KrupnikovYannaSpencerPistonBauerNichole M.. 2016. “Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black Candidates and Female Candidates.” Political Psychology37 (2): 253–273. doi:10.1111/pops.12261.
48.
Latin American Public Opinion Project. 2019. LAPOP Latin American Public Opinion Project. Nashville, TN.
49.
LeeperThomas J.HoboltSara B.TilleyJames. 2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis28 (2): 207–221.
50.
LermanAmy E.WeaverVesla M.. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
51.
MagaloniBeatrizFranco-VivancoEdgarMeloVanessa. 2020. “Killing in the Slums: Social Order, Criminal Governance, and Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro.” American Political Science Review114 (2): 552–572.
52.
MawbyR. I., ed. 1999. Policing across the World: Issues for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
53.
McDermottM. L.2005. “Candidate Occupations and Voter Information Shortcuts.” Journal of Politics67 (1): 201–219.
54.
McDonaldJaredKarolDavidMasonLilliana. 2020. ““An Inherited Money Dude from Queens County”: How Unseen Candidate Characteristics Affect Voter Perceptions.” Political Behavior42 (3): 915–938.
55.
MorrisKevin. 2021. “Welcome Home—Now Vote! Voting Rights Restoration and Postsupervision Participation.” Social Science Quarterly102 (1): 140–153. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12901.
56.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–138.
57.
MummoloJonathanPetersonErikWestwoodSean. 2019. “The Limits of Partisan Loyalty.” Political Behavior43(3), 949–972.
58.
Nueva Rioja. Desafectaron a los policías que le hicieron la venia a Patricia Bullrich |Nueva Rioja. Nueva Rioja. 2021.
59.
O’DonnellGuillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development21 (8): 1355–1369.
60.
PagnanRogérioRodriguesArtur. 2022. PMs candidatos batem recorde em SP e miram voto bolsonarista. Folha de S.Paulo.
61.
PassarinhoNathalia. Como é ser policial militar de esquerda: ’Se é a favor de Bolsonaro, fala à vontade, se é contra, vai pagar por isso. BBC News Brasil. 2022.
62.
PavãoNara. Corruption as the Only Option: The Limits to Electoral Accountability. The Journal of Politics. 2018; 80(3): 996–1010.
63.
PearceJenny. 2010. “Perverse State Formation and Securitized Democracy in Latin America.” Democratization17 (2): 286–306. doi:10.1080/13510341003588716.
64.
PoertnerMathias. 2020. “The Organizational Voter: Support for New Parties in Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science. eprint. doi:10.1111/ajps.12546.
65.
ReynosoLucas.2023. Claudia López, alcaldesa de Bogotá, se viste de militar: “¡Honren al Ejército!” | EL PAÍS América Colombia. El País.
66.
ShamirMichalJacobShamir. 1995. “Competing Values in Public Opinion: A Conjoint Analysis.” Political Behavior17 (1): 107–133.
67.
SossJoeWeaverVesla. 2017. “Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race–Class Subjugated Communities.” Annual Review of Political Science20 (1): 565–591.
68.
TeeleDawn LanganKallaJoshuaRosenbluthFrances. 2018. “The Ties that Double Bind: Social Roles and Women’s Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review112 (3): 525–541.
69.
TeigenJeremy M.2007. “Veterans’ Party Identification, Candidate Affect, and Vote Choice in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Armed Forces & Society33 (3): 414–437.
70.
TeigenJeremy M.2013. “Military Experience in Elections and Perceptions of Issue Competence: An Experimental Study with Television Ads.” Armed Forces & Society39(3):415–433.
71.
TeixeiraIsadoraAlcântaraManoela. 2023. Moraes diz que atos de 8/1 não ocorreriam “se PMDF tivesse atuado” | Metrópoles. Metrópoles. Section: Grande Angular.
72.
TrejoGuillermoLeySandra. 2018. “Why Did Drug Cartels Go to War in Mexico? Subnational Party Alternation, the Breakdown of Criminal Protection, and the Onset of Large-Scale Violence.” Comparative Political Studies51 (7): 900–937.
73.
TylerTom R.FaganJeffreyGellerAmanda. 2014. “Street Stops and Police Legitimacy: Teachable Moments in Young Urban Men’s Legal Socialization.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies11 (4): 751–785. doi:10.1111/jels.12055.
74.
VenturaTiagoLeySandraCantúFrancisco. 2023. Voting for Law and Order: Evidence From a Survey Experiment in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies.
75.
WatsonDavidMorelandAmy. 2014. “Perceptions of Corruption and the Dynamics of Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender10 (3): 392–412.
76.
WeaverVeslaProwseGwenSpencerPiston. 2020. “Withdrawing and Drawing in: Political Discourse in Policed Communities.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics5 (3): 604–647.
77.
WeaverVesla M.2012. “The Electoral Consequences of Skin Color: The “Hidden” Side of Race in Politics.” Political Behavior34 (1): 159–192.
78.
WhiteT. H.1958. The once and Future King. New York: Putnam.
79.
WillisGraham Denyer. 2015. The Killing Consensus: Police, Organized Crime, and the Regulation of Life and Death in Urban Brazil. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
80.
WolfSonja. 2012. “Creating Folk Devils: Street Gang Representations in El Salvador’s Print Media.” Journal of Human Security8 (2): 36–63.
81.
World Values Survey. 1998. “World Values Survey WVS.” Stockholm, Sweden.
82.
ZaniniFábio. 2022. Painel: Número ‘absurdo e exagerado’ de candidaturas de policiais preocupa parlamentares já eleitos em SP. Folha de S.Paulo.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
