Gender quotas have been held to have more far-reaching consequences than increasing women’s political representation. Some scholars claim that they foster women’s overall political engagement. After elaborating a theoretical framework on how affirmative action policies to legislative bodies might be beneficial to constituents of the targeted group, the author tests this hypothesis on women in seventeen Latin American countries. Contrasting previous claims, the author shows that there is no general proof of attitudinal or behavioral effects. The analysis represents an initial attempt to theorize and use large-scale data to examine the more long-term consequences of quota policies on female constituents’ political involvement.
Araújo, Clara, and Isabel García .2006. Latin America: The experience and the impact of quotas in Latin America. In Women, quotas and politics, ed. Drude Dahlerup, 83-111. London : Routledge.
2.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae.2003. Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics65:1040-61.
3.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Nancy Carrillo.2007. More is better: The influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Politics & Gender3:79-101.
4.
Baldez, Lisa.2004. Elected bodies: The gender quota law for legislative candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly29:231-58.
5.
---. 2006. The pros and cons of gender quota laws: What happens when you kick men out and let women in? Politics & Gender2:102-9.
6.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba.2001. The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Craske, Nikki.1999. Women and politics in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
8.
Dahlerup, Drude.2006a. Introduction. In Women, quotas and politics , ed. Drude Dahlerup, 3-31. London : Routledge.
9.
---. 2006b. Women, quotas and politics. London : Routledge.
10.
---. 2007. Electoral gender quotas: Between equality of opportunity and equality of result. Representation43:73-92.
11.
Dahlerup, Drude, and Lenita Freidenvall .2005. Quotas as a "fast track" to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model . International Feminist Journal of Politics7:26-48.
12.
Franceschet, Susan, and Jennifer M. Piscopo . Forthcoming. Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender.
13.
Freedom House.1996. Freedom House index. http://65.110.85.181/uploads/FIWrank7305.xls .
Htun, Mala N., and Mark P. Jones .2002. Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America, ed. Nikki Craske and Maxine Molyneux, 32-56. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
16.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague.1993. Citizens, contexts, and politics. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter, 281-303. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
17.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris.2003. Rising tide. Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
International Parliamentary Union.1997. Women in national parliaments. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm .
19.
Jarstad, Anna.2001. Changing the game: Consociational theory and ethnic quotas in Cyprus and New Zealand. PhD diss., Uppsala Univ.
20.
Jones, Mark P.1998. Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women. Lessons from the Argentine provinces. Comparative Political Studies31:3-21.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Diana O’Brien .2007. The politics of group representation: Quotas for women and minorities worldwide. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association , Chicago.
23.
Kudva, Neema.2003. Engineering elections: The experiences of women in Panchayati Raj in Karnataka, India. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society16:445-63.
24.
Laitin, David D.2002. Comparative politics: The state of the sub-discipline . In Political science: The state of the discipline, ed. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 630-59. New York: Norton .
25.
Lawless, Jennifer L.2004. Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation . Political Research Quarterly57:81-99.
26.
Mansbridge, Jane.1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent "yes." Journal of Politics61:628-57.
27.
Mettler, Suzanne.2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review96:351-65.
28.
Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss.2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics2:55-73.
29.
Nanivadekar, Medha.2006. Are quotas a good idea? The Indian experience with reserved seats for women. Politics & Gender2:119-28.
30.
Norris, Pippa.2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Pacari, Nina.2002. La participación política de la mujer indígena en el Congreso ecuatoriano. Una tarea pendiente. In Mujeres en el parlamento. Mas allá de los números, ed. Myriam Méndez-Montalvo and Julie Ballington, 45-60. Stockholm: International IDEA.
32.
Phillips, Anne.1995. The politics of presence. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
33.
Pierson, Paul.1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics45:595-628.
34.
Quota Project.2006. Global database of quotas for women. http://www.quotaproject.org (accessed May 23, 2006).
35.
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Anders Skrondal .2005. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. London: Stata Press.
36.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and William Mishler .2005. An integrated model of women’s representation. Journal of Politics67:407-28.
37.
Soss, Joe, and Sanford F. Schram .2007. A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review101:111-27.
38.
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Alice Kang.2008. The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41:338-61.
39.
United Nations.1995. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. http://www.1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/beijing4.htm .
40.
United Nations Development Program.1995. Human development report 1995. http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/1995/en/pdf/hdr_1995_ch3.pdf .
41.
---. 1998. Human development report 1998. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~chance/teaching_aids/data/98gdi.htm.
42.
Varshney, Ashutosh.2002. Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie .1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady .1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Wolbrecht, Christina, and David E. Campbell .2007. Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science51: 921-39.
46.
Zetterberg, Pär.2008. The downside of gender quotas? Institutional constraints on women in Mexican state legislatures. Parliamentary Affairs61:442-60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
