This article examines how seven Latin American governments responded to 827 contentious political challenges. The research goes beyond most previous research by considering four governmental responses: concession, repression, toleration, and the combination of concession and repression. The results show that challengers can increase their chances of winning concessions by making limited demands and utilizing nonviolent occupations and hunger strikes. Violent challenges are ineffective and tend to result in repression. Governments also tend to offer concessions under democratic regimes or when they have recently been criticized for human rights abuses while also receiving substantial foreign aid and investment.
Apodaca, Clair.2001. Global economic patterns and personal integrity rights after the cold war. International Studies Quarterly45:587-602.
2.
Brockett, Charles D.2005. Political movements and violence in Central America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Brysk, Allison.1993. From above and below: Social movements, the international system, and human rights in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies26:259-85.
4.
Davenport, Christian.1995. Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science39:683-713.
5.
---. 1996. The weight of the past: Exploring lagged determinants of political repression. Political Research Quarterly49:377-403.
6.
---. 1999. Human rights and the democratic proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution43:92-116.
7.
Davis, David R., and Michael D. Ward .1990. Deaths and the disappeared in contemporary Chile. Journal of Conflict Resolution34 (3): 449-75.
8.
DeNardo, James.1985. Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Earl, Jennifer, Sarah Soule, and John D. McCarthy .2003. Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review68:581-606.
10.
Francisco, Ronald A.1995. The relationship between coercion and protest: An empirical evaluation in three coercive states. Journal of Conflict Resolution39:263-82.
11.
---. 1996. Coercion and protest: An empirical test in two democratic states. American Journal of Political Science40:1179-1204.
12.
---. 2005. The dictator’s dilemma. In Repression and mobilization, ed. Christian Davenport , Hank Johnston, and Carol Mueller, 58-84. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Franklin, James.1997. IMF conditionality, threat perception, and political repression: A cross-national analysis. Comparative Political Studies30:576-606.
14.
---. 2008. Shame on you: The impact of human rights criticism on political repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly52:187-211.
15.
Gamson, William.1990. The strategy of social protest. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16.
Gartner, Scott S., and Patrick Regan.1996. Threat and repression: The non-linear relationship between government and opposition violence. Journal of Peace Research33:273-88.
17.
Goldstone, Jack A., and Charles Tilly.2001. Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics, ed. Jack A. Goldstone, Doug McAdam , Elizabeth J. Perry, William H. Sewell Jr.,Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly, 179-194. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Gupta, Dipak K., Harinder Singh, and Tom Sprague .1993. Government coercion of dissidents: Deterrence or provocation?Journal of Conflict Resolution37:301-39.
19.
Gurr, Ted Robert.1986. The political origins of state violence and terror: A theoretical analysis. In Government violence and repression: An agenda for research, ed. Michael Stohl and George A. Lopez, 45-71. New York: Greenwood.
20.
Hawkins, Darren G.2002. International human rights and authoritarian rule in Chile . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
Henderson, Conway.1991. Conditions affecting the use of political repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:120-42.
22.
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink .1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
23.
Khawaja, Marwan.1993. Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank. Sociological Forum8:47-71.
24.
Klandermans, Bert.1984. Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review49:583-600.
25.
Koopmans, Ruud.1993. The dynamics of protest waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989 . American Sociological Review58: 637-58.
26.
Kowalewski, David.1980. The protest uses of symbolic politics in the USSR. Journal of Politics42 (2): 439-60.
27.
---. 1987. Asian strikes against transnationals. Comparative Political Studies19 (4): 508-24.
28.
Kowalewski, David, and Paul Schumaker.1981. Protest outcomes in the Soviet Union . Sociological Quarterly22: 57-68.
29.
Krain, Matthew.2000. Repression and accommodation in post-revolutionary states . New York: St. Martin’s.
30.
Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Ted Robert Gurr .1981. The conflict process: A formal model. Journal of Conflict Resolution25:3-29.
31.
Lipsky, Michael.1968. Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review62:1144-58.
32.
Lohmann, Susanne.1993. A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action. American Political Science Review87 (2): 319-33.
33.
Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese.2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
34.
Martin, Brian.2006. Justice ignited: The dynamics of backfire. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
Moore, Will H.2000. The repression of dissent: A substitution model of government coercion. Journal of Conflict Resolution44:107-27.
36.
O’Keefe, Michael, and Paul D. Schumaker .1983. Protest effectiveness in Southeast Asia. American Behavioral Scientist26 (3): 375-94.
37.
Piven, Frances, and Richard Cloward .1977. Poor people’s movements: How they succeed, why they fail. New York: Vintage.
38.
Poe, Steven C., and C. Neal Tate .1994. Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review88:853-72.
39.
Poe, Steven C., C. Neal Tate, Linda Camp Keith, and Drew Lanier.2000. Domestic threats: The abuse of personal integrity. In Paths to state repression: Human rights violations and contentious politics, ed. Christian Davenport, 27-70. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
40.
Rasler, Karen.1996. Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian Revolution. American Sociological Review61:132-52.
41.
Risse, Thomas, and Kathryn Sikkink .1999. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. In The power of human rights: International norms and democratic change, ed. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, 1-38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Schirmer, Jennifer.1998. The Guatemalan military project: A violence called democracy . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
Schock, Kurt.2005. Unarmed insurrections: People power movements in nondemocracies . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
Schumaker, Paul D.1975. Policy responsiveness to protest-group demands. Journal of Politics37:488-521.
45.
Sharp, Gene.1973. The politics of nonviolent action. Boston: P. Sargent.
46.
Shin, Myungsoon.1983. Political protest and government decision making: Korea, 1945-1972. American Behavioral Scientist26 (3): 395-416.
47.
Sikkink, Kathryn.2005. Mixed signals: U.S. human rights policy and Latin America . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
Snyder, David, and William R. Kelly .1976. Industrial violence in Italy, 1878-1903. American Journal of Sociology82:131-62.
49.
Tarrow, Sidney.1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics . 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Tilly, Charles.1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
51.
Wilson, James Q.1961. The strategy of protest. Journal of Conflict Resolution5:291-303.
