Although much work has examined the conditions for competition and incumbent defeat in high-visibility elections, scholars have conducted little research on these conditions for less visible offices. We look at one particular type of low-information election: those to state intermediate appellate courts (IAC). Using a comprehensive data set of all IAC elections involving incumbents from 2000 to 2007, we estimate models of challenger entry and incumbent success once challenged. Our results comport, in some cases, and diverge, in others, with the findings of studies of more visible judicial and legislative offices.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1988. Explaining Senate election outcomes. American Political Science Review82:385-403.
2.
---. 1991. Incumbency, campaign spending, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics53:34-57.
3.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal .1992. Senate elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Barrilleaux, Charles, Thomas Holbrook, and Laura Langer.2002. Electoral competition, legislative balance, and American state welfare policy. American Journal of Political Science46: 415-27.
5.
Baum, Lawrence.1983. The electoral fates of incumbent judges in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas. Judicature66:42-50.
6.
---. 2003. Judicial elections and judicial independence: The voter’s perspective. Ohio State Law Journal64:14-41.
7.
Bonneau, Chris W.2004. Patterns of campaign spending and electoral competition in state supreme court elections. Justice System Journal25:21-38.
8.
---. 2005a. Electoral verdicts: Incumbent defeats in state supreme court elections. American Politics Research33: 818-41.
9.
---. 2005b. What price justice(s)? Understanding campaign spending in state supreme court elections. State Politics and Policy Quarterly5:107-25.
10.
---. 2007a. The dynamics of campaign spending in state supreme court elections. In Running for judge: The rising political, financial, and legal stakes of judicial elections, ed. Matthew J. Streb, 59-72. New York: New York University Press.
11.
---. 2007b. The effects of campaign spending in state supreme court elections. Political Research Quarterly60: 489-99.
12.
Bonneau, Chris W., and Melinda Gann Hall .2003. Predicting challengers in state supreme court elections: Context and the politics of institutional design . Political Research Quarterly56:337-49.
13.
Brace, Paul, and Brent D. Boyea. 2007. Judicial selection methods and capital punishment in the American states. In Running for judge: The rising political, financial, and legal stakes of judicial elections, ed. Matthew J. Streb, 186-203. New York: New York University Press.
14.
---. 2008. State public opinion, the death penalty and the practice of electing judges. American Journal of Political Science52:360-72.
15.
Brace, Paul, Melinda Gann Hall, and Laura Langer.1999. Judicial choice and the politics of abortion: Institutional choice and the autonomy of courts. Albany Law Review62:1265-1302.
16.
---. 2001. Placing state supreme courts in state politics. State Politics and Policy Quarterly1:81-108.
17.
Burrell, Barbara C.1994. A woman’s place is in the House: Campaigns for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell .2000. Incumbency and the probability of reelection in state legislative elections. Journal of Politics62:671-700.
19.
Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning .2004. Judicial processes in America . 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20.
Carson, Jamie L., Erik J. Engstrom, and Jason M. Roberts .2007. Candidate quality, the personal vote and the incumbency advantage in Congress. American Political Science Review101:289-303.
21.
Dahl, Robert A.1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
22.
Dubois, Phillip L.1980. From ballot to bench: Judicial elections and the quest for accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
23.
---. 1984. Voting cues in nonpartisan trial court elections: A multivariate assessment. Law and Society Review18: 395-436.
24.
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright .2005. Voters, candidates and issues in congressional elections. In Congress reconsidered, ed. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer, 77-106. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25.
Fiorina, Morris P.1978. Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro-analysis. American Journal of Political Science22:426-43.
26.
Frederick, Brian, and Matthew J. Streb .Forthcoming-a. Paying the price for a seat on the bench: Campaign spending in state intermediate appellate court elections . State Politics and Police Quarterly.
27.
---. Forthcoming-b. Women running for judge: The impact of sex on candidate success in state intermediate appellate court elections. Social Science Quarterly.
28.
Gerber, Alan.1998. Estimating the effects of campaign spending on Senate outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review92:401-11.
29.
Green, Donald Phillip, and Jonathan Krasno .1988. Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections . American Journal of Political Science32:884-907.
30.
Griffin, John D.2006. Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: A defense of the marginality hypothesis. Journal of Politics68:894-910.
31.
Hall, Melinda Gann.1987. Constituent influence in state supreme courts: Conceptual notes and a case study. Journal of Politics49:1117-24.
32.
---. 1992. Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics54:427-46.
33.
---. 1995. Justices as representatives: Elections and judicial politics in theAmerican states. American Politics Quarterly23:485-503.
34.
---. 2001a. State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review95:315-30.
35.
---. 2001b. Voluntary retirements from state supreme courts: Assessing democratic pressures to relinquish the bench. Journal of Politics63:1112-40.
36.
---. 2007a. Competition as accountability in state supreme court elections. In Running for judge: The rising political, financial, and legal stakes of judicial elections, ed. Matthew J. Streb, 165-85. New York: New York University Press.
37.
---. 2007b. Voting in state supreme court elections: Competition and context as democratic incentives. Journal of Politics69:1147-59.
38.
---. 2008. State courts: Politics and the judicial process. In Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis, ed. Virginia Gray and Russell L. Hanson, 229-55. 9th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
39.
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Chris W. Bonneau .2006. Does quality matter? Challengers in state supreme court elections. American Journal of Political Science50:20-33.
40.
---. 2008. Mobilizing interest: The effects of money on citizen participation in state supreme court elections. American Journal of Political Science52:457-70.
41.
Herrnson, Paul S.1988. Party campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Hibbing, John R., and Sarah Brandes.1983. State population and electoral success of U.S. senators. American Journal of Political Science27:808-19.
43.
Hogan, Robert E.2004. Challenger emergence and electoral accountability in state legislative elections. Journal of Politics66:543-60.
44.
---. 2005. Gubernatorial coattail effects in state legislative elections . Political Research Quarterly58:587-97.
45.
Jacobson, Gary C.1989. Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S. House elections, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review83:773-93.
46.
---. 1990. The effects of campaign spending in House elections: New evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science34:334-62.
47.
---. 2004. The politics of congressional elections. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
48.
Kinder, Donald R., Gordon S. Adams, and Paul W. Gronke .1989. Economics and politics in the 1984 American presidential election. American Journal of Political Science33:491-515.
49.
Klein, David, and Lawrence Baum.2001. Ballot information and voting decisions in judicial elections. Political Research Quarterly54:709-28.
50.
Krasno, Jonathan S.1994. Challengers, competition, and reelection: Comparing Senate and House elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald Phillip Green.1988. Preempting quality challengers in House elections. Journal of Politics50:920-36.
52.
Lanoue, David J.1994. Retrospective and prospective voting in presidential-year elections. Political Research Quarterly47: 193-205.
53.
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Kathryn Pearson .2008. The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics70:67-82.
54.
Lee, Frances E., and Bruce I. Oppenheimer .1999. Sizing up the Senate: The unequal consequences of equal representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
Lovrich, Nicholas P., Jr., and Charles H. Sheldon.1983. Voters in contested, nonpartisan judicial elections: A responsible electorate or a problematic public?Western Political Quarterly36:241-56.
56.
Mann, Thomas E., and Norman J. Ornstein .1981. The Republican surge in Congress. In The American elections of 1980, ed. Austin Ranney, 119-41. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
57.
Mondak, Jeffrey J.1995. Competence, integrity and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics57: 1043-69.
58.
Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon.2006. Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York: Routledge.
59.
Peters, C. Scott.2007. Cannons, cost and competition in state supreme court elections . Judicature91:27-35.
60.
Schaffner, Brian F., and Jennifer Segal Diascro.2007. Judicial elections in the news. In Running for judge: The rising political, financial, and legal stakes of judicial elections, ed. Matthew J. Streb, 115-39. New York: New York University Press.
61.
Schaffner, Brian F., and Matthew J. Streb .2002. The partisan heuristic in low-information elections. Public Opinion Quarterly66:559-81.
62.
Schaffner, Brian F., Matthew J. Streb, and Gerald C. Wright .2001. Teams without uniforms: The nonpartisan ballot in state and local elections. Political Research Quarterly54:7-30.
63.
---. 2007. A new look at the Republican advantage in nonpartisan elections. Political Research Quarterly60:240-49.
64.
Seltzer, Richard A., Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton.1997. Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
65.
Squire, Peverill.2000. Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly25:131-46.
66.
Squire, Peverill, and Eric R.A.N. Smith.1988. The effect of partisan information on voters in nonpartisan elections. Journal of Politics50:169-79.
67.
Stone, Walter J., L. Sandy Maisel, and Cherie Maestas.2004. Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence. American Journal of Political Science48:479-95.
68.
Streb, Matthew J.2007. Partisan involvement in partisan and nonpartisan trial court elections. In Running for judge: The rising political, financial, and legal stakes of judicial elections, ed. Matthew J. Streb, 96-114. New York: New York University Press.
69.
Streb, Matthew J., Brian Frederick, and Casey LaFrance.2007. Contestation, competition, and the potential for accountability in intermediate appellate court elections. Judicature91:70-78.
70.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King.2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu.
71.
Van Dunk, Emily.1997. Challenger quality in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly50:793-907.
72.
Weber, Ronald E., Harvey Tucker, and Paul Brace.1991. Vanishing marginals in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly16:29-47.
73.
Williams, Margaret.2007. Women’s representation on state trial and appellate courts. Social Science Quarterly88: 1192-1204.
