While much important research exists on the topic of religion and politics, very little exists on candidate religious affiliation and its potential effect on voters' behavior. This article addresses the issue of candidate religion from the point of view that it acts as an information cue for voters in elections through trait and belief stereotypes. Using a case study of hypothetical evangelical Christian candidates and an original experimental data set, this analysis demonstrates that voters stereotype evangelicals as more conservative than other candidates, as well as more competent and trustworthy, all else equal. These stereotypes subsequently play a significant role in voters' choices of whom to support.
Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Andersen .1993. Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly46:527-45.
2.
Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes .1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.
3.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Stanley Feldman .1982. Projection and the perception of candidates' issue positions. Western Political Quarterly35:228-44.
4.
---. 1989. Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science33 (4): 912-40.
5.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
6.
Eisenstein, Marie.2006. Rethinking the relationship between religion and political tolerance in the US. Political Behavior28:327-48.
7.
Fastnow, Chris, J. Tobin Grant, and Thomas Rudolph.1999. Holy roll calls: Religious tradition and voting behavior in the U.S. House. Social Science Quarterly80 (4): 687-701.
8.
Feldman, Stanley, and Pamela Johnston Conover.1983. Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. Journal of Politics45:810-39.
9.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor .1991. Social cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
10.
Herberg, Will.1960. Protestant-Catholic-Jew: An essay in American religious sociology. Garden City, NY: Anchor .
11.
Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen .1993. Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119-47.
12.
Jelen, Ted, and Clyde Wilcox.1990. Denominational preference and the dimensions of political tolerance. Sociological Analysis51:69-81.
13.
Jervis, Robert.1993. The drunkard's search. In Explorations in political psychology, ed. Shanto Iyengar and William J. McGuire.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., and John C. Green .1993. Knowing God's many people: Denominational preference and political behavior. In Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics, ed. David C. Leege and Lyman A. Kellstedt.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
15.
Koch, Jeffrey W.2000. Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates' ideological orientations?Journal of Politics62:414-29.
16.
Kunda, Ziva.1990. The case for motivated political reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480-98.
17.
Layman, Geoffrey C.1997. Religion and political behavior in the United States: The impact of beliefs, affiliations and commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly61 (2): 288-316.
18.
---. 1999. "Culture wars" in the American party system- Religious and cultural change among partisan activists since 1972. American Politics Quarterly27 (1): 89-121.
19.
Lippmann, Walter.1922. Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
20.
Lord, Charles G., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper .1979. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37 (11): 2098-2109.
21.
McDermott, Monika L.1998. Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly51:895-918.
22.
---. 2007. Voting for Catholic candidates: The evolution of a stereotype . Social Science Quarterly88 (4): 953-69.
23.
McGraw, Kathleen M., Mark Fischle, Karen Stenner, and Milton Lodge.1996. What's in a word? Bias in trait descriptions of political leaders. Political Behavior18 (3): 263-87.
24.
Miller, Alan S., and John P. Hoffmann .1999. The growing divisiveness: Culture wars or a war of words?Social Forces78 (2): 721-45.
25.
Miller, Arthur H.1990. Public judgments of Senate and House candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly15 (4): 525-42.
26.
Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk .1986. Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review80 (2): 521-40.
27.
Mondak, Jeffrey J.1993. Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues . Political Behavior15 (2): 167-92.
28.
---. 1995. Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of Congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics57 (4): 1043-69.
29.
Ottati, Victor C., and Robert S. Wyer Jr.1990. The cognitive mediators of political choice: Toward a comprehensive model of political information processing. In Information and democratic processes, ed. John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
30.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Rahn, Wendy M.1993. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 472-96.
32.
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan .1990. A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In Information and democratic processes , ed. John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Sigelman, Carol K., Lee Sigelman, Barbara J. Walkosz, and Michael Nitz.1995. Black candidates, white voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 243-65.
34.
Wilcox, Clyde.1990. Religion and politics among white evangelicals: The impact of religious variables on political attitudes. Review of Religious Research32 (1): 27-42.
35.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Arthur H. Miller .1997. Social groups and political judgments. Social Science Quarterly78 (3): 625-40.
36.
Wolf, Christof.2005. Measuring religious affiliation and religiosity in Europe . In Methodological aspects in cross-national research, ed. J. F. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and Janet Harkniss.Mannheim: ZUMA.
37.
Yamane, David, and Elizabeth A. Oldmixon .2006. Religion in the legislative arena: Affiliation, salience, advocacy and public policymaking. Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (3): 433-60.
38.
Zaller, John R.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
