Is race politics about racism, ideology, or group conflict? After decades, this debate seems scarcely closer to resolution, despite the enormous theoretical, empirical, and normative issues at stake. I argue that a misguided approach to interpreting public opinion has stymied the debate. All three theories implicitly try to read a person’s motives for supporting or opposing proposals off of their placement in the so-called complex space of contemporary opinion about race. However, I show that because the supposed complexity of the issue space is based on a methodological artifact, any attempt to read qualitative differences in motives from it must fail.
Bobo, L.1983. Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 1195-210.
2.
---. 1998. Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new direction. American Behavioral Scientist41: 985-1003.
3.
---. 2000. Race and beliefs about affirmative action: Assessing the effects of interests, group threat, ideology, and racism. In Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America, edited by D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius , and L. Bobo, 137-64. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
4.
Bock, R., D.R. Gibbons, and E. Muraki.1988. Full-information item factor analysis . Applied Psychological Measurement12: 261-80.
5.
Bollen, K.1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Clinton, J., S. Jackman, and D. Rivers.2004. The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review98: 355-70.
7.
Delli Carpini, M., and S. Keeter.1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Guttman, L.1950. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Measurement and prediction, edited by S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld , S. Star, and J. A. Clausen, 78-96. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Kinder, D.R., and T. Mendelberg.2000. Individualism reconsidered: Principles and prejudice in contemporary American opinion. In Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America, edited by D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius , and L. Bobo, 44-74. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
10.
Kinder, D.R., and L.M. Sanders.1996. Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Kinder, D.R., and D.O. Sears.1981. Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40: 414-31.
12.
Knol, D.L., and M.P. Berger.1991. Empirical comparison between factor analysis and multidimensional item response models. Multivariate Behavioral Research46: 457-77.
13.
Kuklinski, J.H., Paul M. Sniderman, Kathleen Knight, Thomas Piazza, Philip E. Tetlock, Gordon R. Lawrence, and Barbara Mellers .1997. Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science41: 402-19.
14.
Martin, A., and K. Quinn.2002. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999. Political Analysis10: 134-53.
15.
Neblo, Michael A. n.d. Motive matters: Liberalism and insincerity. http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers.htm .
16.
---. 2008. Three-fifths a racist: A typology for analyzing public opinion about race. Political Behavior30, no. 3 (April 10), doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9060-2. http://www.springerlink.com/content/y70pk8p76837pu2p/fulltext.pdf .
17.
Niemi, R., S. Craig, and F. Mattei.1991. Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review85: 1407-13.
18.
Poole, K., and H. Rosenthal.1985. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science29: 357-84.
19.
Sears, D.O.1994. Ideological bias in political psychology: The view from scientific hell. Political Psychology15: 547-56.
20.
Sears, D.O., and P.J. Henry.2005. Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 95-150.
21.
Sears, D. O., J. Sidanius , and L. Bobo, eds. 2000. Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Sears, D.O., C. VanLaar, M. Carrillo, and R. Kosterman.1997. Is it really racism: The origins of white Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly61: 16-53.
23.
Sidanius, J., and F. Pratto.1999. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Sniderman, P.M., and E.G. Carmines.1997. Reaching beyond race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
Sniderman, P.M., Gretchen C. Crosby, and William G. Howell .2000. The politics of race . In Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America , edited by D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, and L. Bobo , 236-79. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
26.
Sniderman, P.M., and T. Piazza.1993. The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/ Harvard University Press.
27.
Sniderman, P.M., and P.E. Tetlock.1986. Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues42: 129-50.
28.
Tarman, C., and D.O. Sears.2005. The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. Journal of Politics67: 731-61.
29.
Tetlock, P.E.1994. Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? Political Psychology15: 509-29.
30.
Wood, J.1994. Is symbolic racism racism? A review informed by intergroup behavior. Political Psychology15: 673-86.
