Do investors assess the credibility of campaign rhetoric? To answer this question, I develop several alternative arguments for how investors might consider candidates' policy platforms and apply them to Mexico's 2006 presidential race. Statistical analysis of polling trends and the Mexican stock market shows that rising electoral uncertainty lowered market performance, while growing support for either the left-leaning Andrés Manuel López Obrador (PRD) or the market-friendly Felipe Calderón Hinojosa (PAN) reduced market volatility. These findings reveal that investors discounted López Obrador's left-leaning rhetoric but did not ignore the effect of a tight race on the value of their assets.
Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal .1995. Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Alesina, Alberto, and Nouriel Roubini , with Gerald Cohen.1997. Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3.
Bear Stearns. 2006a. Mexico: Madrazo loses steam, Calderon gains a bit, but Obrador remains in front-implications for investors. March 31.
4.
---. 2006b. Mexico: Overall valuations are high, while risks rise-downgrading to underweight from market weight; take profits in media. February 7.
5.
Bernhard, William, and David Leblang.2002. Democratic processes, political risk, and foreign exchange markets. American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 316-33.
6.
---. 2006. Pricing politics: Democratic processes and financial markets . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Block, Steven A., Burkhard N. Schrage, and Paul M. Vaaler .2003. Democracy's spread: elections and sovereign debt in developing countries. University of Michigan Business School, William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 575, June.
8.
Calderón Hinojosa, Felipe.2005. Diálogos por México. Mimeo. November.
9.
Credit Suisse.2006a. Results from our survey on Mexico's elections. June 22.
10.
---. 2006b. A tight race, with two months before elections. May 2.
11.
---. 2006c. Trying to make sense of the sell-off in rates. April 5.
12.
Fowler, James H.2006. Elections and markets: The effect of partisanship, policy risk, and electoral margins on the economy. The Journal of Politics68 (1): 89-103.
13.
Franzese, Robert.2002. Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science5: 369-421.
14.
Freeman, John R., Jude C. Hays, and Helmut Stix.2000. Democracy and markets: The case of exchange rates. American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 449-68.
15.
Herron, Michael C.2000. Estimating the economic impact of political party competition in the 1992 British election. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 326-37.
16.
Hibbs, Douglas A.1987. The political economy of industrial democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
J.P. Morgan.2006. Special report: Previewing Mexico's July 2 presidential election. May 26.
18.
Jensen, Nathan M., and Scott Schmith.2005. Market responses to politics: The rise of Lula and the decline of the Brazilian stock market. Comparative Political Studies38 (10): 1245-70.
19.
Leblang, David.2002. The political economy of speculative attacks in the developing world. International Studies Quarterly46:69-91.
20.
Leblang, David, and Bumba Mukherjee .2005. Government partisanship, elections and the stock market: Examining American and British stock returns, 1930-2000. American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 781-803.
21.
López Obrador, Andrés Manuel.2005. Diálogos por México. Mimeo. November.
22.
Madrazo Pintado, Roberto.2005. Diálogos por México. Mimeo. November.
23.
Martinez, Juan, and Javier Santiso.2003. Financial markets and politics: The confidence game in Latin American emerging economies. International Political Science Review24 (3): 363-95.
24.
Mauser, Gary A., and Craig Fitzsimmons .1991. The short-term effect of election polls on foreign exchange rates: The 1988 Canadian federal election . Public Opinion Quarterly55 (2): 232-40.
25.
McGillivray, Fiona.2003. Redistributive politics and stock price dispersion. British Journal of Political Science33:367-95.
26.
Medley Global Advisors.2006a. Mexico: Calderon loses his edge. May 26.
27.
---. 2006b. Mexico: Election hinges on the swing (voters). June 12.
28.
---. 2006c. Mexico: IFE can call a tight election and avoid political tensions. February 21.
29.
---. 2006d. Mexico: Presidential race a statistical tie. April 25.
30.
Mosley, Layna.2003. Global capital and national governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Remmer, Karen.2002. The politics of economic policy and performance in Latin America. Public Policy22 (1): 29-59.
32.
Simmons, Beth A.1999. The internationalization of capital. In Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, ed. Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Stokes, Susan.2001. Mandates and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Strange, Susan.1996. The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Weyland, Kurt.1996. Risk taking in Latin American economic restructuring: Lessons from prospect theory." International Studies Quarterly40 (2): 185-208.
36.
Wibbels, Erik.2006. Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization60 (2): 433-68.
