Studies of outlying committee preferences have been conducted with different preference measures and methodological approaches and have generated conflicting results. To assess the effects of these study design differences, I use multiple methodological approaches to examine committee-floor differences with jurisdiction-specific interest group data during a longer time period than earlier studies. After comparing results across methods, I compare them to past findings using the same method but different preference measures. I find that differences in preference measures largely explain previous contradictory results. Additionally, outlying tendencies exist among all committees expected to be outliers under conditional claims of the distributive theory.
Adler, E. Scott.2000. Constituency characteristics and the "guardian" model of appropriations subcommittees, 1959-1998. American Journal of Political Science44:104-14.
2.
---. 2002. Why congressional reforms fail: Reelection and the House committee system. Chicago and London : University of Chicago Press.
3.
Adler, E. Scott, and John S. Lapinski .1997. Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science41:895-918.
4.
Arnold, Douglas.1979. Congress and the bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Burden, Barry C., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Tim Groseclose .2000. Measuring the ideologies of U.S. senators: The song remains the same. Legislative Studies Quarterly25:237-58.
6.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Barry Rundquist .1999. Party and committee in distributive politics: Evidence from defense spending. Journal of Politics61:1156-69.
7.
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins .1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party government in House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Deering, Christopher J., and Steven S. Smith .1997. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
9.
Fenno, Richard F.1973. Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
10.
Frisch, Scott A., and Sean Q. Kelly .2004. Self-selection reconsidered: House committee assignment requests and constituency characteristics. Political Research Quarterly57:325-36.
11.
Gilligan, Thomas, and Keith Krehbiel.1987. Collective decision-making and standing committees: An informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures . Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3:287-35.
12.
---. 1989. Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science33:459-90.
13.
---. 1990. Organization of informative committees by a rational legislature . American Journal of Political Science34:531-64.
14.
---. 1994. The gains from exchange hypothesis of legislative organization . Legislative Studies Quarterly19:181-214.
15.
Groseclose, Tim.1994. Testing committee composition hypotheses for the U.S. Congress. Journal of Politics56:440-58.
16.
Groseclose, Tim, Steven D. Levitt, and James M. Snyder Jr.1999. Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress . American Political Science Review93:33-50.
17.
Hall, Richard L., and Bernard Grofman .1990. The committee assignment process and the conditional nature of committee bias. American Political Science Review84:1149-66.
18.
Herron, Michael C.2004. Studying dynamics in legislator ideal points: Scale matters . Political Analysis12:182-90.
19.
Hurwitz, Mark S., Roger J. Moiles, and David W. Rohde .2001. Distributive and partisan issues in agriculture policy in the 104th house. American Political Science Review95:911-22.
20.
Jackson, John E., and John W. Kingdon .1992. Ideology, interest group scores, and legislative votes. American Journal of Political Science13:805-23.
21.
Julnes, George, and Lawrence B. Mohr .1989. Analysis of no-difference findings in evaluation research. Evaluation Review13:628-55.
22.
Krehbiel, Keith.1990. Are congressional committees composed of preference outliers ? American Political Science Review84:149-63.
23.
---. 1991. Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
---. 1994. Deference, extremism, and interest group ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly19:61-77.
25.
Lowi, Theodore J.1964. Review: American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics16:677-715.
26.
Maltzman, Forrest.1997. Competing principals: Committees, parties, and the organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
Poole, Keith, and Howard Rosenthal .1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science35:228-78.
28.
Rohde, David W.1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
---. 1994. Parties and committees in the House: Member motivations, issues, and institutional arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly19:341-59.
30.
Rohde, David W., and Kenneth A. Shepsle .1973. Democratic committee assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic aspects of a social choice process . American Political Science Review67:889-905.
31.
Rundquist, Barry, and John Ferejohn.1975. Observations on a distributive theory of policymaking: Two American expenditure programs compared. In Comparative public policy: Issues, theories and methods, ed. Craig Kiske, William Loehr , and John McCamant.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
32.
Shepsle, Kenneth A.1978. The giant jigsaw puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast .1994. Positive theories of congressional institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly19:149-79.
34.
Smith, Steven S., and Christopher J. Deering.1990. Committees in Congress . 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
35.
Snyder, James M., Jr.1992. Artificial extremism in interest group ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly17:319-45.
36.
VanDoren, Peter M.1990. Can we learn the causes of congressional decisions from roll-call data?Legislative Studies Quarterly15:311-40.
37.
Weingast, Barry, and William Marshall .1988. The industrial organization of Congress. Journal of Political Economy91:132-63.
38.
Young, Garry, and Valerie Heitshusen .2003. Party and the dynamics of congressional committee composition in the US House, 1947-96. British Journal of Political Science33:659-79.
