A prominent liberal explanation for why states join international organizations is to advance norms that such organizations represent. The authors examine the patterns of membership on the now-defunct United Nations Human Rights Commission (now the UN Human Rights Council). In regions where democratic norms did not hold sway, members were elected to degrade human rights norms. Illiberal states sought seats to shield themselves or neighbors from censure by the Commission. As regions became more democratic, it became harder for states with poor records to be elected and easier for states with better human rights records to be elected.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal.1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (1): 3-32.
2.
Alston, Philip.1992. The Commission on Human Rights. In The United Nations and human rights: A critical appraisal, ed. Philip Alston.Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
3.
---. 2006. Reconcieving the UN human rights regime: Challenges confronting the new UN Human Rights Council. Melbourne Journal of International Law7 (1): 185-224.
4.
American Journal of International Law.2001 . Loss of US seat on UN Human Rights Commission. 95 (4): 877-78.
5.
Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane .1985. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics38 (1): 226-54.
6.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam.2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26:179-204.
7.
Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder.2005. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis13:1-20.
8.
Brown, David S.1999, Reading, writing, and regime type. Political Research Quarterly52 (4): 681-707.
9.
Bull, Hedley.1977. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics . New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
Cingranelli, David L., and David L. Richards .1999. Respect for human rights after the end of the cold war. Journal of Peace Research36 (5): 511-34.
11.
---. 2004. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. http://ciri.binghamton.edu/.
12.
Crescenzi, Mark, and Andrew Enterline .1999. Ripples from the waves: A systemic, time-series analysis of democracy, democratization and interstate war. Journal of Peace Research36 (1): 75-94.
13.
Davenport, Christian.1999. Human rights and the democratic proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (1): 92-116.
14.
Dennis, Michael J.1997. The Fifty-second Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights. American Journal of International Law91 (1): 167-77.
15.
---. 1998. The Fifty-third Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights. American Journal of International Law92 (1): 112-24.
16.
---. 1999. The Fifty-fourth Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights. American Journal of International Law93 (1): 246-52.
17.
Dixon, William J.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88:14-32.
18.
Donnelly, Jack.1989. Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
Finnemore, Martha.1993. International organizations as teachers of norms . International Organization47:565-97.
20.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink .1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52 (4): 887-917.
21.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor.1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations . International Organization50 (1): 109-39.
22.
Gibler, Douglas, and Meredith Sarkees .2002. Coding manual for v3.0 of the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816-2000. http://www.correlatesofwar.org.
23.
Gibney, Mark, and Matt Dalton.1996. The Political Terror Scale. In Human rights and developing countries, ed. David Louis Cingranelli.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24.
Guest, Iain.1995. Behind the disappearances. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Kiyoteru Tsutsui .2005. Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology110 (5): 1373-1411.
26.
Hathaway, Oona A.2002. Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal111:1935-2042.
27.
Heyns, Christof, and Frans Viljoen.2001. The impact of the UN human rights treaties on the domestic level. Human Rights Quarterly23:483-535.
28.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr .1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32:469-82.
29.
Jetschke, Anja.1999. Linking the unlinkable? International norms and nationalism in Indonesia and the Philippines. In The power of human rights , ed. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink.New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Joachim, Jutta.2003. Framing issues and seizing opportunities: Women's rights and the UN. International Studies Quarterly47 (2): 247-74.
31.
Kadera, Kelly M., Mark J.C. Crescenzi, and Megan L. Shannon.2003. Democratic survival, peace and war in the international system. American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 234-47.
32.
Kapp, Clare.2003. Top human rights body meets under shadow of war . The Lancet, April 19, p. 1358.
33.
Kent, Ann.1995. China and the international human rights regime: A case study of multilateral monitoring. Human Rights Quarterly17 (1): 1-47.
34.
Keohane, Robert O.1984. After hegemony. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
35.
Lake, David, and Matthew Baum.2001. The invisible hand of democracy. Comparative Political Studies34 (6): 587-621.
36.
Lebovic, James H., and Erik Voeten2006a. The cost of shame: International organizations, foreign aid, and human rights norms enforcement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, CA.
37.
---. 2006b. The politics of shame: The condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 861-88.
38.
Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn Sikkink .2000. International human rights law and practice in Latin America. International Organization54:633-59.
39.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse .2006. Democratization and international organizations. International Organization60 (1): 137-67.
40.
Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett.1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87:624-38.
41.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin.2002. A Kantian system? Democracy and third party conflict resolution . American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 749-59.
42.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Scott Gates, and Havard Hegre.1999. Evolution in democracy-war dynamics . Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (6): 771-92.
43.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Kelly M. Kadera, and Mark J.C. Crescenzi.2005. Practicing democratic community norms: Third party conflict management and successful settlements. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the International Studies Association , Montreal, Canada.
44.
Moravcsik, Andrew.2000. The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization54 (2): 217-52
45.
Narasimhan, C.V.1988. The United Nations: An insiders view. New Delhi, India: Vikas Publishing.
46.
Neumayer, Eric.2005. Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (6): 925-53.
47.
Pevehouse, Jon, Timothy Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke.2003. Intergovernmental organizations, 1815-2000: A new Correlates of War Data Set. http://www.correlatesofwar.org .
48.
Pevehouse, Jon, and Bruce Russett.2006. Democratic international governmental organizations promote peace. International Organization60 (4): 969-1000.
49.
Poe, Steven C., and C. Neal Tate .1994. Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review88 (4): 853-72.
50.
Poe, Steven C., C. Neal Tate, and Linda Camp Keith .1999. Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976-1993. International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 291-313.
51.
Report of the Task Force on the United Nations.2005. American interests and UN reform. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.
52.
Risse, Thomas.2000. "Let's argue!" Communicative action in world politics . International Organization54 (1): 1-39.
53.
Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 1999. The power of human rights. New York : Cambridge University Press.
54.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace. New York: Norton.
55.
Schmitz, Hans Peter, and Kathryn Sikkink .2002. International human rights . In Handbook of international relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Signorino, Curtis, and Jeffrey Ritter.1999. Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43:115-44.
57.
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey.1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war and numbers, ed. Bruce Russett.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie.1995. International law in a world of liberal states . European Journal of International Law6:503-38.
59.
---. 2000. A liberal theory of international law. American Society of International Law Proceedings94:240-49.
60.
Smith, Courtney B.2006. Politics and process at the United Nations: The global dance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
61.
Thomas, Daniel C.2001. The Helsinki effect. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
62.
Thompson, Alexander.2006. Coercion through IOs: The Security Council and the logic of information transmission. International Organization60 (1): 1-34.
63.
Tolley, Howard.1987. The UN Commission on Human Rights. Boulder, CO: Westview.
64.
United Nations, Report of the Secretary-General. 2005. In larger freedom: towards development, security, and human rights for all . A/59/2005. New York: United Nations.
65.
U.S. Congress. Senate.2001. Subcommittee on International Operations and Terrorism of the Committee on Foreign Relations. The UN Human Rights Commission: The road ahead. 107th Cong., 1st sess, May 24. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
66.
Wadhams, Nick.2006. U.N. says human rights violators cite U.S. Washington Post, October 24.
67.
Zorn, Christopher J. W.2001. Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science45:470-90.
