A large telephone survey conducted after the attacks of September 11, 2001, suggests that the willingness to tolerate discrimination varies significantly across domains, with a very high tolerance of discrimination against poorly educated immigrants and a strikingly low tolerance of discrimination against the genetically disadvantaged. Regardless of domain, tolerance is greater among men than among women. A survey conducted simultaneously over the World Wide Web, using volunteer panels, replicated the phone survey results and revealed an even larger sex gap. This finding suggests that a social desirability bias leads women to overstate and men to understate their tolerance of discrimination in public.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Timur Kuran, Edward J. McCaffery, and Carla VanBeselaere .2002a. Documentation for January 2002 Web survey. http://survey.caltech.edu/CodeJan2002Net.pdf .
2.
---. 2002b. January 2002 telephone survey codebook. http://survey.caltech.edu/cOdeJan2002Phone.pdf.
3.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Edward J. McCaffery .2000. Gender and tax. In Gender and American politics: Women, men, and the political process , ed. Sue Tolleson-Rinehart and Jyl J. Josephson, 91-113. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
4.
---. 2003. Are there sex differences in fiscal political preferences ? Political Research Quarterly56:5-17.
5.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Robert P. Sherman, and Carla E. VanBeselaere .2003. Subject acquisition for Web-based surveys: Political analysis. Political Analysis11:23-43.
6.
Aquilino, William S.1994. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly58:210-40.
7.
Atkeson, Lona Rae, and Ronald B. Rapoport .2003. The more things change the more they stay the same: Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952-2000. Public Opinion Quarterly67:495-521.
8.
Babcock, Linda, and Sara Laschever.2003. Women don't ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Brown-Kruse, Jamie, and David Hummels.1993. Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization22:255-67.
10.
Carpini, Michael X. Delli, and Scott Keeter.2000. Gender and tax. In Gender and American politics: Women, men, and the political process, ed. Sue Tolleson-Rinehart and Jyl J. Josephson, 21-52. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
11.
Chang, Lin Chiat, and Jon A. Krosnick .2004. National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing vs. the Internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Manuscript on file with the authors.
12.
Couper, Mick P.2000. Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches . Public Opinion Quarterly64:464-94.
13.
Dillman, Don A., Glenn Phelps, Robert Tortora, Karen Swift, Julie Kohrell, and Jodi Berck.2003. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response and the Internet. http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/Mixed%20Mode%20ppr%20_with%20Gallup_%20POQ.pdf.
14.
Diver, Colin S., and Jane Maslow Cohen .2001. Point/counterpoint: Genophobia: What is wrong with genetic discrimination?University of Pennsylvania Law Review149:1439-82.
15.
Drummond, Tammerlin.1999. It's not just in New Jersey; Cops across the U.S. often search people just because of their race, a study says. Time , June 14, p. 61.
16.
Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossman .1996. The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization30:143-58.
17.
---. 1998. Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator games. Economic Journal108:726-35.
18.
Fehr, Ernst, Georg Kirchsteiger, and Arno Riedl.1993. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics108:437-60.
19.
Foster, Mindi D., Stacey Arnt, and Jill Honkola.2004. When the advantaged become disadvantaged: Men's and woman's actions against gender discrimination. Sex Roles50:27-36.
20.
Frey, Bruno S.1997. Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
21.
Gilligan, Carol.1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Glick, Peter, Susan T. Fiske, Antonio Mladinic, Jose L. Saiz, Dominic Abrams, Barbara Masser, Bolanle Adetoun, Johnstone E. Osagie, Adebowale Akande, Amos Alao, et al. 2000. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79:763-75.
23.
Greene, William H.2003. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
24.
Güth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger, and Bernd Schwarze.1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization3:367-88.
25.
Holbrook, Allyson L., Melanie C. Green, and Jon A. Krosnick .2003. Mode effects on satisficing and social desirability. Public Opinion Quarterly67:79-125.
26.
Holbrook, Allyson L., and Jon A. Krosnick .2005. Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count and randomized response techniques. Manuscript on file with the authors.
27.
Hughes, Michael, and Steven Tuch.2003. Gender differences in whites' racial attitudes: Are women's attitudes really more favorable? Social Psychology Quarterly66:384-401.
28.
Johnson, Monica K., and Margaret M. Marini .1998. Bridging the racial divide in the United States: The effect of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly61:247-58.
29.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg .2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. http://gking.harvard.edu/stats.shtml.
30.
Krysan, Maria.1998. Privacy and the expression of white racial attitudes: A comparison across three contexts. Public Opinion Quarterly62:506-44.
31.
Kuran, Timur.1995. Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Kuran, Timur, and Edward J. McCaffery .2004. Expanding discrimination research: Beyond ethnicity and to the Web. Social Science Quarterly85:713-30.
33.
Lueptow, Lloyd B., Susan L. Moser, and Brian Pendleton .1990. Gender and response effects in telephone interviews about gender characteristics. Sex Roles22:29-42.
34.
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth.1984. The spiral of silence: Public opinion-Our social skin . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Peterson, Iver.2000. "Time to get off our backs," leader of state police says . New York Times, December 1, p. B5.
36.
Rapoport, Ronald B., Walter J. Stone, and Alan I. Abramowitz .1990. Sex and the caucus participant: The gender gap and presidential nominations. American Journal of Political Science34:725-40.
37.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Edward G. Carmines .1997. Reaching beyond race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
