Many studies document positive relationships between political information and campaign participation, but none investigates the relationship between information and interelection change in campaign participation. While studies of “floating voters” document negative relationships between information and floating, the author notes that activists are better informed than voters and investigates the relationship between knowledge and change in participation, comparing the process among voters and activists. The author shows low-information citizens enter and exit the electorate, while high-information citizens enter and exit the activist pool. The author concludes with an optimistic assessment of democratic change based on the theory that well-informed activists influence floating voters.
Beck, Paul A.2002. Encouraging political defection: The role of personal discussion networks in partisan desertions to the opposition party and Perot votes in 1992. Political Behavior24 (4): 309-337.
2.
Berelson, Bernard, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Boyd, Richard W.1986. Electoral change and the floating voter: The Reagan elections. Political Behavior8:230-244.
4.
Butler, David, and Donald Stokes. 1969. Political change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's.
5.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Carmines, Edward G., and James Woods. 2002. The role of party activists in the evolution of the abortion issue. Political Behavior24:361-377.
7.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 1999. A dynamic model of political change among party activists. Political Behavior21:17-41.
8.
Converse, Philip. 1962/1966. Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. In Elections and the political order, ed. Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Dobson, Douglas, and Douglas St. Angelo. 1975. Party identification and the floating vote: Some dynamics. American Political Science Review69:481-490.
11.
Dreyer, Edward C.1971-1972. Media use and electoral choices: Some political consequences of information exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly35:544-553.
12.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The macro polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Herrera, Richard. 1995. The crosswinds of change: Sources of change in the Democratic and Republican parties. Political Research Quarterly48:291-312.
14.
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. The social communication of political expertise. American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 425-438.
15.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2004. Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Jacobson, Gary C.2006. Measuring campaign spending effects in U.S. House elections. In Capturing campaign effects, ed. Henry E. Brady and Richard Johnston, 199-220Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Key, V. O.1966. The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The people's choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Miller, Warren E., and M. Kent Jennings. 1986. Parties in transition: A longitudinal study of party elites and party supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
Rapoport, Ronald B., and Walter J. Stone. 1994. A model for disaggregating political change. Political Behavior16 (4): 505-532.
22.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
23.
Shively, Phillips W.1992. From differential abstention to conversion: A change in electoral change, 1864-1988. American Journal of Political Science36 (2): 309-330.
24.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voices and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. Explaining women's rights realignment: Convention delegates, 1972-1992. Political Behavior24:237-282.
26.
Zaller, John R.1985. Pre-testing information items on the 1986 NES pilot survey. Report to the National Election Study Board of Overseers. Study Report no. nes002261. http://www.electionstudies.org/resources/papers/pilotrpt.htm.
27.
Zaller, John R.2004. Floating voters in U.S. presidential elections, 1948-2000. In Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change, ed. Willem Saris and Paul M. Sniderman, 166-214. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
