Proponents of direct democracy contend that the institution increases political knowledge, but limited evidence supports this assertion over a single election. Previous studies of the relationship, however, do not account for the heterogeneous effects of each proposition and employ political knowledge scales that insufficiently rely on information directly related to political campaigns. I address these limitations by looking at the issue content of each ballot measure and using the 2006 and 2008 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies (CCES), which contain numerous voting-relevant and policy-oriented questions from which to construct an improved measurement of actual campaign learning. Although I find no effect attributable to the total number of measures on the ballot, those addressing social issues, because they are well known, highly salient, and tap into existing social cleavages, do exhibit the hypothesized effect on political knowledge. I discuss the implications of these findings in the conclusion.
AbramowitzA. I. (1995). It’s abortion, stupid: Policy voting in the 1992 presidential election. Journal of Politics,57, 176-186.
2.
AbramowitzA. (2004). Terrorism, gay marriage, and incumbency: explaining the Republican victory in the 2004 presidential election. The Forum,2(4), Article 3. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1059
3.
AlvarezR. M.BrehmJ. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science,39, 1055-1082.
4.
AlvarezR. M.BrehmJ. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AnsolabehereS.IyengarS. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York, NY: Free Press.
6.
ArceneauxK. (2006). Do campaigns help voters learn? A cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science,36, 159-173.
7.
BarabasJ.JeritJ. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 73-89.
8.
BarberB. (1984). Strong democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BartelsL. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science,40, 194-230.
10.
BenzM.StutzerA. (2004). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics?Public Choice,119, 21-59.
11.
BerelsonB. R.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BiggersD. R. (2011). When ballot issues matter: Social issue ballot measures and their impact on turnout. Political Behavior,33, 3-25.
13.
BolceL.De MaioG. (1999). The anti-Christian fundamentalist factor in contemporary politics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 508-542.
14.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (1998). Demanding choices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science,32, 371-390.
16.
BurdenB. C. (2004). An alternative account of the 2004 presidential election. The Forum,2(4), Article 2. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1057
17.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
18.
CampbellD. E. (2006). Religious “threat” in contemporary presidential elections. Journal of Politics,68, 104-115.
19.
CampbellD. E.MonsonJ. Q. (2008). The religion card: Gay marriage and the 2004 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly,72, 399-419.
20.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review,74, 78-91.
21.
ChildersM. A.BinderM. (in press). Engaged by the initiative? How the use of citizen initiatives increases voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly
22.
ColemanJ. J.MannaP. F. (2000). Congressional campaign spending and the quality of democracy. Journal of Politics, 62, 757-789.
23.
ConverseP. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: Free Press.
24.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
DonovanT.TolbertC. J.SmithD. A. (2008). Priming presidential votes by direct democracy. Journal of Politics,70, 1217-1231.
26.
DonovanT.TolbertC. J.SmithD. A. (2009). Political engagement, mobilization, and direct democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly,73, 98-118.
27.
DonovanT.BowlerS.McCuanD.FernandezK. (1998). Contending players and strategies: Opposition advantages in initiative campaigns. In BowlerS.DonovanT.TolbertC. J. (Eds.), Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States (pp. 80-105). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
28.
FinkelS. E. (1993). Reexamining the “minimal effects” model in recent presidential elections. Journal of Politics,55, 1-21.
29.
FreedmanP.FranzM.GoldsteinK. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science,48, 723-741.
30.
GeerJ. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attacks ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
GelmanA.KingG. (1993). Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?British Journal of Political Science,23, 409-451.
32.
GilensM. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review,95, 379-396.
33.
GrummelJ. A. (2008). Morality politics, direct democracy, & turnout. State Politics and Policy Quarterly,8, 282-292.
34.
Haider-MarkelD. P.KaufmanM. S. (2006). Public opinion and policymaking in the culture wars: Is there a connection between opinion and state policy on gay and lesbian issues? In CohenJ. (Ed.), Public opinion in state politics (pp. 163-182). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
Haider-MarkelD. P.MeierK. J. (1996). The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics,58, 332-349.
36.
HanmerM. J.KalkanK. O. (2009). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. Manuscript in preparation.
37.
HerronM. C. (2000). Postestimation uncertainty in limited dependent variable models. Political Analysis,8, 83-98.
38.
IyengarS.SimonA. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology,51, 149-169.
39.
JoslynM. R.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2002). Framing effects on personal opinion and perception of public opinion: The cases of physician-assisted suicide and social security. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 690-706.
40.
KahnK. F.KenneyP. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J.JeritJ.RichR. F. (2001). The political environment and citizen competence. American Journal of Political Science,45, 410-424.
42.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science,45, 951-971.
43.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics,69, 1176-1209.
44.
LaymanG. C. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
45.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M. (2002). Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science,46, 786-802.
46.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
LupiaA. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,88, 63-76.
48.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LuskinR. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior,12, 331-361.
50.
McCuanD.BowlerS.DonovanT.FernandezK. (1998). California’s political warriors: Campaign professionals and the initiative process. In DonovanT.TolbertC. J. (Eds.), Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States (pp. 55-79). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
51.
McDonaldM. P. (2004). Up, up, and away! Voter participation in the 2004 presidential election. The Forum,2(4), Article 4. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1058
52.
MendelsohnM.CutlerF. (2000). The effect of referendums on democratic citizens: Information, politicization, efficacy, and tolerance. British Journal of Politic science,30, 685-698.
53.
MondakJ. J. (1995). Nothing to read: Newspapers and elections in a moral experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54.
MooneyC. Z. (1999). The politics of morality policy: Symposium editor’s introduction. Policy Studies Journal,27, 675-680.
55.
MooneyC. Z. (2001). The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. New York, NY: Chatham House.
56.
MooneyC. Z.LeeM. (1995). Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 599-627.
57.
NicholsonS. P. (2003). The political environment and ballot proposition awareness. American Journal of Political Science,47, 403-410.
58.
PatemanC. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60.
SchlozmanD.YohaiI. (2008). How initiatives don’t always make citizens: Ballot initiatives in the American states, 1978-2004. Political Behavior,30, 469-489.
61.
SmithD. A.TolbertC. J. (2004). Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
SmithD. A.DeSantisM.KasselJ. (2006). Same-sex marriage ballot measures and the 2004 presidential election. State and Local Government Review,38, 78-91.
63.
SmithM. A. (2001). The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout. American Journal of Political Science,45, 700-706.
64.
SmithM. A. (2002). Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizen. Journal of Politics, 64, 893-903.
65.
TatalovichR.SmithA.BobicM. P. (1994). Moral conflict in the policy process. Policy Currents,4, 1-7.
66.
TatalovichR.DaynesB. W. (1998). Moral controversies in American politics: Cases in social regulatory policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
67.
TolbertC. J.SmithD. A. (2005). The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research,33, 283-309.
68.
TolbertC. J.BowenD. C.DonovanT. (2009). Initiative campaigns, direct democracy, and voter mobilization. American Politics Research,37, 155-192.
69.
TolbertC. J.GrummelJ.SmithD. A. (2001). The effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout in the American states. American Politics Research,29, 625-648.
70.
TolbertC. J.McNealR. S.SmithD. A. (2003). Enhancing civic engagement: The effect of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics and Policy Quarterly,3, 23-41.
71.
WolakJ. (2009). The consequences of concurrent campaigns for citizen knowledge of congressional candidates. Political Behavior, 31, 211-229.
72.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
