We observed secondary school students in Peru to see how posture changes with different classroom tasks. Forward leaning was by far the most common posture, especially while writing, where students often stayed bent over for long periods. Reading allowed more alternation, with arm support and relaxed postures providing short breaks. Listening to the teacher produced the most variety, combining upright and relaxed positions. These findings show that posture depends strongly on the task and suggest opportunities for better furniture design, posture awareness, and active breaks.
CastellucciH.ArezesP.MolenbroekJ. (2015). Equations for defining the mismatch between students and school furniture: A systematic review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 48, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.002
3.
CastellucciH.ArezesP.VivianiC. (2010). Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.001
4.
DianatI.KarimiM. A.HashemiA. A.BahrampourS. (2013). Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: Proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Applied Ergonomics, 44(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.004
DuganJ. E. (2018). Teaching the body: A systematic review of posture interventions in primary schools. Educational Review, 70(5), 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1359821
7.
GrafM.GuggenbühlU.KruegerH. (1995). An assessment of seated activity and postures at five workplaces. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00027-z
8.
HelanderM. (2005). Work posture. In A guide to human factors and ergonomics (2nd Edition). CRC press.
KroemerK. H.KroemerH. J.Kroemer-ElbertK. E. (2020). Engineering physiology: Bases of human factors engineering/ergonomics. Springer.
11.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
12.
ParcellsC.StommelM.HubbardR. P. (1999). Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: Empirical findings and health implications. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00113-X
13.
PheasantS.HaslegraveC. (2006). Principles and Practice of anthropometrics. In Bodyspace. Anthropometry , Ergonomics and the Design of Work (Third Edition). CRC Press.
14.
ResendeB. B. D.AlmeidaP. S.SilvaM. A.SantosP. S.ÁvilaM. V. D.GuimarãesA. C.DamázioL. C. M.SaldanhaP. C. (2023). Prevalence of postural changes in school children and adolescents. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 31(spe2), Article e262255. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e262255
15.
TahernejadS.ChoobinehA.RazeghiM.Abdoli-EramakiM.ParsaeiH.DaneshmandiH.SeifM. (2022). Investigation of office workers’ sitting behaviors in an ergonomically adjusted workstation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(4), 2346–2354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1990581
16.
ValencianoP. J.CibinelloF. U.NevesdeJ. C.J.FujisawaD. S. (2021). Effects of postural education in elementary school children: A systematic review. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 39, Article e2020005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2021/39/2020005
17.
WangC.TozadoreD. C.BrunoB.DillenbourgP. (2025). Quantitative analysis of the correlation between body posture quality assessment scores and handwriting quality measures. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 23099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08405-4
