Police Control Room (PCR) Vehicles, or vans, are mobile units used by the city police. The city police of Gandhinagar City in western India complained of bad design of the van dashboard resulting in user frustration, errors, and dull look and feel. The existing dashboard was a makeshift arrangement by the local vendors, designing it without any reference to the users. The research team was approached to address these issues. The team analyzed the design issues on the current dashboard from the users’ perspective and came up with two concept prototypes which were tested on the users with positive results.
AllisonC. K.StantonN. A. (2020). Ideation using the “Design with Intent” toolkit: A case study applying a design toolkit to support creativity in developing vehicle interfaces for fuel-efficient driving. Applied Ergonomics, 84(4), 103026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103026
2.
BurkolterD.WeyersB.KlugeA.LutherW. (2014). Customization of user interfaces to reduce errors and enhance user acceptance. Applied Ergonomics, 45(2), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.017
3.
CornetH.StadlerS.KongP.MarinkovicG.FrenklerF.SathikhP. M. (2019). User-centred design of autonomous mobility for public transportation in Singapore. Transportation Research Procedia, 41(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.038
4.
CostaN. A.HolderE.MacKinnonS. N. (2017). Implementing human centred design in the context of a graphical user interface redesign for ship manoeuvring. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100(4), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.006
5.
FrisonA. K.WintersbergerP.RienerA. (2019). Resurrecting the ghost in the shell: A need-centered development approach for optimizing user experience in highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65(8), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.001
6.
KraftA. K.NaujoksF.WörleJ.NeukumA. (2018). The impact of an in-vehicle display on glance distribution in partially automated driving in an on-road experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 52(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.012
7.
KunA. L.MillerW. T.LenharthW. H. (2005). Computers in police cruisers. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2004.3
8.
LeeS. C.KimY. W.JiY. G. (2019). Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context. Applied Ergonomics, 81(11), 102888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102888
9.
MerloC.Abi AkleA.LlariaA.TerrassonG.VilleneuveE.PilniereV. (2019). Proposal of a user-centred approach for CPS design: Pillbox case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(34), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.065
10.
PayreW.DielsC. (2019). Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension?Applied Ergonomics, 80(10), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.006
11.
RaddaouiO.AhmedM. M.GaweeshS. M. (2020). Assessment of the effectiveness of connected vehicle weather and work zone warnings in improving truck driver safety. IATSS Research.
12.
RydströmA.BroströmR.BengtssonP. (2012). A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. Applied Ergonomics, 43(3), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.004
ShahiniF.NasrV.ZahabiM. (2025). Assessing advanced driver assistance systems in police vehicles under demanding conditions. Ergonomics, 68(8), 1320–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652
15.
StevensonM. G.ColemanN.LongA. F.WilliamsonA. M. (2000). Assessment, re-design and evaluation of changes to the driver's cab in a suburban electric train. Applied Ergonomics, 31(5), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00014-4
16.
VaezipourA.RakotonirainyA.HaworthN.DelhommeP. (2017). Enhancing eco-safe driving behaviour through the use of in-vehicle human-machine interface: A qualitative study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100(6), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.030
17.
WellingsT.WilliamsM.TennantC. (2010). Understanding customers’ holistic perception of switches in automotive human–machine interfaces. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.004
18.
WoodT. E.FraserN. B.WilsonA. D.MegawE. D. (1988). The ergonomic design of a tube train drivers cab. In Megaw, E. D. (ed.). Contemporary ergonomics 1988. Proceedings of the annual conference of the ergonomics society, Manchester (pp. 279–284). Taylor & Francis.
19.
YoungG. W.KitchinR. (2020). Creating design guidelines for building city dashboards from a user’s perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 140(9), 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102429
