This study measured 354 Jordanian children in six age group categories from 6 months to 9 years. The linear static measurements included the skeletal dimensions between body joints and the middle- and lower-body dimensions. The results showed negligible differences in seat height, seat depth, and seat width for males and females. However, desk surface height and elbow rest height differed for male and female children older than 5 years. These data can inform the design of various functional items such as tools, clothes, protective equipment, or furniture for Jordanian children.
AduG.AduS.Frimpong-MensahK.DarkwaN. (2015). Evaluation of a modelled office chair in an office environment at Kumasi polytechnic in Ghana. International Journal of Recent Science Researches, 6(4), 3719–3724. https://www.recentscientific.com/sites/default/files/2257.pdf
2.
AghaS. R.AlnahhalM. J. (2012). Neural network and multiple linear regression to predict school dimensions for ergonomic school furniture design. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.01.007
BendakS.Al-SalehK.Al-KhalidiA. (2013). Ergonomic assessment of primary school furniture in United Arab Emirates. Occupational Ergonomics, 11(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-130209
5.
BendixT. (1984). Seated trunk posture at various seat inclination, seat heights, and table heights. Human Factors, 26(6), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088402600609
6.
BridgerR. S. (1995). Introduction to ergonomics. McGraw-Hill.
DawalS. Z. M.IsmailZ.YusufK.Abdul-RashidS. H.ShalahimN. S. M.AbdullahN. S.KamilN. S. M. (2015). Determination of the significant anthropometry dimensions for user-friendly designs of domestic furniture and appliances—experience from a study in Malaysia. Journal of Measurement, 59, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.030
10.
GouvaliM. K.BoudolosK. (2006). Match between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009
11.
HasanM. A.BatiehaA.JadouH.KhawaldehA. K.AjlouniK. (2001). Growth status of Jordanian schoolchildren in military funded schools. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601167
JungH. S. (2005). Prototype of an adjustable and an adjustable chair for schools. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(10), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.007
14.
MilaneseS.GrimmerK. (2004). School furniture and the user population: An anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics, 47(4), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013032000157841
15.
MolenbroekJ. F. M.Kroon-RamaekersY. M. T.SnijdersC. J. (2003). Revision of the design of a standard for dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics, 46(7), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000085635
16.
OyewoleS. A.HaightJ. M.FreivaldsA. (2010). The ergonomic design of classroom furniture/computer work station for first graders in the elementary school. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.02.002
ParcellsC.StommelM.HubbardR. P. (1999). Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00113-x
19.
ParkinsonM. B.ReedM. P. (2010). Creating virtual user populations by analysis of anthropometric data. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.07.003
20.
SandersM. S.McCormickE. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
21.
SnyderR. G.SchneiderL.W.OwingsC. L.ReynoldsH. M.GolombD. H.SchorkM. A. (1977). Anthropometry of infants, children and youths to age 18 for product safety design (Technical Report No. UM-HSRI-77-17, Consumer Product Safety Commission). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/684
22.
SnyderR. G.SpencerM. L.OwingsC. L.SchneiderL. W. (1975). Physical characteristics of children as related to death and injury for consumer product design and use (Technical Report No. UM-HSRI-BI-75-5, Consumer Product Safety Commission). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/1556
23.
SteenbekkersL. P. A. (2009). Anthropometry of children 2 to 13 years of age in the Netherlands. In: Contemporary ergonomics 1984–2008: Selected papers and an overview of the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference (pp. 335–340). Taylor & Francis.
24.
TaifaI. W.DesaiD. A. (2017). Anthropometric measurements for ergonomic design of students’ furniture in India. Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal, 20, 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.08.004
25.
ZanuncioS. V.MafraS. C. T.AntônioC. E. B.FilhoJ. L.GuimarãesE. M. V.SilvaV. E. D.SouzaA. P. D.MinetteL. J. (2012). Determining anthropometric variables as a tool in the preparation of furniture and designs of interior spaces: The case of children 6 to 11 years old of Vicosa, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Work, 41(Suppl. 1), 4626–4632. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0757-4626
