Australia is one of only two known countries with a safety standard specifying levels of contrast required to provide accessible environments for people with visual impairment. However, these requirements were not developed based on empirical research involving people with vision loss. We investigated whether the level of luminance contrast in Australian accessibility standards, 30%, is adequate for people with visual impairments to detect and identify discrete tactile ground surface indicators over a range of contrasts with the background flooring before contact. We found that the 30% luminance contrast is adequate for people with low vision, although they preferred higher contrast.
AlabdulkaderB.LeatS. J. (2010). Reading in children with low vision. Journal of Optometry, 3(2), 68–73. doi:10.1016/S1888-4296(10)70010-8
2.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
ArditiA. (2017). Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility. Journal of Vision, 17(5), 8. doi:10.1167/17.5.8
4.
ArnkilH.Fridell AnterK.KlarènU. (2012). Colour and light: Concepts and confusions. Helsinki: Aalto University.
5.
Australian Building Codes Board. (2016). National Construction Code Series 2016. Canberra: Author.
6.
*BittnerA. K.GouldJ. M.RosenfarbA.RozanskiC.DagnelieG. (2014). A pilot study of an acupuncture protocol to improve visual function in retinitis pigmentosa patients. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 97(3), 240–247. doi:10.1111/cxo.12117
7.
*BochslerT. M.LeggeG. E.GageR.KallieC. S. (2013). Recognition of ramps and steps by people with low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 52, 288–294. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10461
8.
*BoonM.-Y.ChuB. S.LeeP.-C.ChiangT.-J.AlshamliN.AlghamdiW.. . . BridgeC. (2015). Perceptions of older people regarding their vision and incident causation. Optometry & Vision Science, 92(10), 995–1002. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000695
9.
BrightK.CookG. (2010). The colour, light and contrast manual: Designing and managing inclusive built environments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
British Standards Institution. (2009). BS 8300: Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people—Code of practice. London: Author.
11.
BrusiniP. (2007). Ageing and visual field data. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 91(10), 1257–1258.
12.
*CachoI.DickinsonC. M.SmithH. J.HarperR. A. (2010). Clinical impairment measures and reading performance in a large age-related macular degeneration group. Optometry & Vision Science, 87(5), 344–349. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181d9515c
13.
CampbellA. J.RobertsonM. C.La GrowS. J.KerseN. M.SandersonG. F.JacobsR. J.. . . HaleL. A. (2005). Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people aged ≥ 75 with severe visual impairment: The VIP trial. British Medical Journal, 331(7520), 817.
14.
Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2007). International best practices in universal design: A global review. Ontario: Author.
15.
ColeB. L.MaddocksJ. D.SharpeK. (2004). Visual search and the conspicuity of coloured targets for colour vision normal and colour vision deficient observers. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 87(4–5), 294–304.
DalkeH.CorsoA. (2013). Making an entrance: Colour, contrast and the design of entrances to homes of people with sight loss. London: Kingston University London.
18.
*DoughertyB. E.FlomR. E.BullimoreM. A. (2005). An evaluation of the Mars letter contrast sensitivity test. Optometry & Vision Science, 82(11), 970–975. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.ea
19.
FabriekE.de WaardD.SchepersJ. P. (2012). Improving the visibility of bicycle infrastructure. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1(1), 98–115. doi:10.1504/IJHFE.2012.045274
20.
*FariaB. M.DumanF.ZhengC. X.WaisbourdM.GuptaL.AliM.. . . SpaethG. L. (2015). Evaluating contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration using a novel computer-based test. The Spaeth/ Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test. Retina, 35(7), 1465–1473. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474
21.
Feitosa-SantanaC.ParameiG. V.NishiM.GualtieriM.CostaM. F.VenturaD. F. (2010). Color visual impairment in type 2 diabetes assessed by the D-15d test and the Cambridge Colour Test. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 30(5), 717–723.
22.
*GardinerA.ArmstrongR. A.DunneM. C. M.MurrayP. (2002). Correlation between visual function and visual ability in patients with uveitis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86(9), 993–996.
23.
*GlenF. C.CrabbD. P.SmithN. D.BurtonR.Garway-HeathD. F. (2012). Do patients with glaucoma have difficulty recognizing faces?Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(7), 3629–3637. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8538
24.
*HassanS. E.MassofR. W. (2012). Measurements of street-crossing decision-making in pedestrians with low vision. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 410–418. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.009
25.
*HassanS. E.SnyderB. D. (2012). Street-crossing decision-making: A comparison between patients with age-related macular degeneration and normal vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(10), 6137–6144. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10023
26.
*HaymesS. A.ChenJ. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and high/low contrast visual acuity chart. Optometry & Vision Science, 81(5), 308–316. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000134904.21274.db
27.
*HaymesS. A.JohnstonA. W.HeyesA. D. (2002). Relationship between visual impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 22(2), 79–91.
28.
HeylighenA.Van DorenC.VermeerschP.-W. (2013). Enriching our understanding of architecture through disability experience. Open House International, 38(1), 7–19.
29.
JacksonA. J. (2007). Assessment of visual function. In JacksonA. J.WolffsohnJ. S. (Eds.), Low vision manual (pp. 129–166). London: Butterworth Heinemann.
30.
*JacksonM. L.BassettK.Nirmalan, P. V., & Sayre, E. C. (2007). Contrast sensitivity and visual hallucinations in patients referred to a low vision rehabilitation clinic. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 91(3), 296–298. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.104604
31.
KnopfN. A.BoonM-Y.SuaningG. J.ZapfM. P.GriggJ. (2017). Initial mobility behaviors of people with visual impairment in a virtual environment using a mixed methods design. In 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference, LSC 2017 (pp. 153–156). New York, NY: IEEE.
32.
KuehniR. G. (2013). Color: An introduction to practice and principles (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
33.
*KuykT.ElliottJ. L. (1999). Visual factors and mobility in persons with age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36(4), 303–312.
34.
*LathamK.TabrettD. R. (2012). Guidelines for predicting performance with low vision aids. Optometry & Vision Science, 89(9), 1316–1326. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825bff1c
35.
LawC. M.YiJ. S.ChoiY. S.JackoJ. A. (2007). Unresolved problems in accessibility and universal design guidelines. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 15(3), 7–11. doi:10.1177/106480460701500301
36.
LayM.WickwareE.RosenfieldM. (2009). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. In RosenfieldM.LoganN.EdwardsK. (Eds.), Optometry: Science, techniques and clinical management (pp. 173–186). London: Elsevier Ltd.
37.
LeatS. J. (2016). A proposed model for integrated low-vision rehabilitation services in Canada. Optometry & Vision Science, 93(1), 77–84. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000750
38.
LeatS. J.Lovie-KitchinJ. E. (2008). Visual function, visual attention, and mobility performance in low vision. Optometry & Vision Science, 85(11), 1049–1056. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b949d
39.
LeggeG. E.ParishD. H.LuebkerA.WurmL. H. (1990). Psychophysics of reading XI—Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7(10), 2002–2010.
40.
LeggeG. E.RubinG. S.LuebkerA. (1987). Psychophysics of reading V—The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research, 27(7), 1165–1177.
41.
LeggeG. E.YuD.KallieC. S.BochslerT. M.GageR. (2010). Visual accessibility of ramps and steps. Journal of Vision, 10(11), 8. doi:10.1167/10.11.8
42.
LewisA.TorringtonJ. (2013). Extra-care housing for people with sight loss: Lighting and design. Lighting Research & Technology, 45(3), 345–361. doi:10.1177/1477153512450451.
43.
Lovie-KitchinJ. E.WhittakerS.G. (1999). Prescribing near magnification for low vision patients. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 82(6), 214–224.
44.
*MassofR. W.DeremeikJ. T.ParkW. L.GroverL. L. (2007). Self-reported importance and difficulty of driving in a low-vision clinic population. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48(11), 4955–4962. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0566
45.
MurthyG.JohnsonG. (2012). Prevalence, incidence and distribution of visual impairment. In JohnsonG. J.MinassianD. C.WealeR. A.WestS. K. (Eds.), The epidemiology of eye disease (pp. 3–61). London: Imperial College Press.
46.
MollonJ. D.ReganB. C. (2000). Cambridge Colour Test handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Research Systems.
47.
NeufertE.NeufertP. (2012). Architects’ data (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
ParkinJ.SmithiesN. (2012). Accounting for the needs of blind and visually impaired people in public realm design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 135–149. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.646139
PurvesD.LottoR. (2011). Why we see what we do redux: A wholly empirical theory of vision. Oxford, UK: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
51.
*RiaziA.BoonM.-Y.DainS. J.BridgeC. (2013). Coping strategies may not be reflected by simulated performance-based measures of functional ability. Journal of Optometry, 6(2), 101–108. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2012.08.001
52.
RiaziA.RiaziF.YoosfiR.BahmeeiF. (2016). Outdoor difficulties experienced by a group of visually impaired Iranian people. Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 28(2), 85–90. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2016.04.002
53.
*Richter-MuekschS.SturM.StifterE.RadnerW. (2006). Differences in reading performance of patients with drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 244(2), 154–162. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0063-y
54.
RubinG. S.LeggeG. E. (1989). Psychophysics of reading VI—The role of contrast in low vision. Vision Research, 29(1), 79–91.
55.
Standards Australia. (1992). AS 1428.4-1992: Design for access and mobility Part 4: Tactile ground surface indicators for the orientation of people with vision impairment. Canberra: Author.
56.
Standards Australia. (2009a) AS 1680.0-2009: Interior lighting. Part 0: Safe movement. Canberra: Author.
57.
Standards Australia. (2009b). AS 1680.1-2009: Interior and workplace lighting. Part 1: General principles and recommendations. Canberra: Author.
58.
Standards Australia. (2010). AS 1428.1-2009: Design for access and mobility—General requirements for access—New building work. Canberra: Author.
59.
Standards Australia. (2014). AS 1428.4.1-2009: Design for access and mobility: Means to assist the orientation of people with visual impairment—Tactile ground surface indicators. Canberra: Author.
60.
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. (2002). 1428.4-2002: Design for access and mobility Part 4: Tactile indicators. Canberra: Author.
61.
SteinfeldE.D’ SouzaC.WhiteJ. (2014). Developing evidence-based standards: A case study in knowledge transition. In Universal Design 2014: Three Days of Creativity and Diversity: Proceedings of the International Conference on Universal Design, UD 2014 Lund, Sweden, June 16–18, 2014 (pp. 89–99). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
62.
*SzlykJ. P.TagliaD. P.PaligaJ.EdwardD. P.WilenskyJ. T. (2002). Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39(4), 467–482.
63.
TanH.BoonM.-Y.DainS. J. (2014). The visibility of controls and labels on electronic devices and their suitability for people with impaired vision. Work, 47(3), 309–317. doi:10.3233/WOR-131769
64.
*TejeriaL.HarperR.ArtesP.DickinsonC. (2002). Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: Perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86(9), 1019–1026.
*Van LandinghamS. W.MassofR. W.ChanE.FriedmanD. S.RamuluP. Y. (2014). Fear of falling in age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmology, 14(1), 10. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-10
67.
*VirgiliG.PierrottetC.ParmeggianiF.PenninoM.GiacomelliG.SteindlerP.. . . OrzalesiN. (2004). Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: A study using the MNREAD charts. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45(10), 3418–3424. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0390
68.
*WallisT. S.TaylorC. P.WallisJ.JacksonM. L.BexP. J. (2014). Characterization of field loss based on microperimetry is predictive of face recognition difficulties. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 55(1), 142–153. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12420
WhittakerS. G.Lovie-KitchinJ. E. (1994). The assessment of contrast sensitivity and contrast reserve for reading rehabilitation. In KooijmanA. C.LooijestijnP. L.WellingJ. A.van der WildtG. J. (Eds.), Low vision—Research and new developments in rehabilitation (pp. 88–92). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
