We describe a new surgical checklist for veterinary cardiologists based on the literature and the application of human factors design. The checklist was developed and iterated with subject-matter experts and was implemented for 4 months, during which use of the checklist was monitored, feedback was gathered, and a final survey was distributed to assess subjective experiences. Although developed for the cardiology team, the checklist also affected the anesthesia team by requiring information and responses to be transmitted across teams. Interviews, subjective reports, and observations pointed to the fact that the checklist engendered communication, particularly by requiring the thoughts and expectations of team members to be stated explicitly.
ApperlyI. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 825–839.
2.
BernsteinD. M.ThorntonW.SommervilleJ. A. (2011). Theory of mind through the ages: Older and middle-aged adults exhibit more errors than do younger adults on a continuous false belief task. Experimental Aging Research, 37, 481–502.
3.
DrewsF. A. (2013). Adherence engineering: A new approach to increasing adherence to protocols. Ergonomics in Design, 21(4), 19–25. doi:10.1177/1064804613497957
4.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339.
5.
GassonJ.WagerC. (2013). Improving patient safety in the peri-operative period: Surgical safety checklists. Veterinary Nurse, 4, 332–337.
6.
GaoF.CummingsM. L.SoloveyE. T. (2014). Modeling teamwork in supervisory control of multiple robots. IEEE Transactions on Human–Machine Systems, 44, 441–453. doi:10.1109/THMS.2014.2312391
7.
GawandeA. (2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
8.
HaynesA. B.WeiserT. G.BerryW. R.LipsitzS. R.BreizatA. S.DellingerE. P.HerbosaT.JosephS.KibatalaP. L.LapitanM. C. M.MerryA. F.MoorthyK.ReznickR. K.TaylorB.GawandeA. A. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 491–499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
9.
KalischB. J.LeeH.SalasE. A. (2012). The development and testing of the nursing teamwork survey. In PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (Eds.), Resource manual for nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed., pp. 328–351). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
10.
KayJ.MaisonneuveN.YacefK.ReimannP. (2006). The Big Five and visualisations of team work activity. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 4053, 197–206.
11.
KeysarB.LinS. H.BarrD. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41.
12.
LingardL.EspinS.RubinB.WhyteS.ColmenaresM.BakerG.DoranD.GroberE.OrserB.BohnenJ.ReznickR. (2005). Getting teams to talk: Development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 340–346. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.012377
13.
McMillanM. (2014). New frontiers for veterinary anaesthesia: The development of veterinary patient safety culture. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 41, 224–226.
14.
NewtonL. (1990). Overconfidence in the communication of intent: Heard and unheard melodies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
15.
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know – and sometimes misjudge – what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.
16.
PronovostP.NeedhamD.BerenholtzS.SinopoliD.ChuH.CosgroveS.SextonB.HyzyR.WelshR.RothG.BanderJ.KeprosJ.GoeschelC. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 2725–2732. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061115
17.
SalasE.SimsD. E.BurkeC. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork?Small Group Research, 36, 555–599.
18.
SavitskyK.KeysarB.EpleyN.CarterT.SwansonA. (2011). The closeness–communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 269–273. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005
19.
WeiserT. G.HaynesA. B.LashoherA.DziekanG.BoormanD. J.BerryW. R.GawandeA. A. (2010). Perspectives in quality: Designing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 22, 365−70. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzq039
20.
World Health Organization. (2009). Implementation manual: WHO surgical safety checklist. Safe surgery saves lives. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
