SYNC and MyFord Touch represent the new direction in automotive human-machine interface (HMI) for Ford Motor Company. Improving driver focus was one of the most critical aspects in the development of the new HMI. This article describes the approach used in development to ensure that driver attention would be improved with this new system. This approach includes research, technology, requirements, and education. The research that was conducted and used, the technology and associated benefits, and the requirements that were followed during the development of the new system are summarized.
DingusT. A.KlauerS. G. (2008). The relative risks of secondary task induced driver distraction (SAE Paper 2008-21-001). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
2.
Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Washington, DC: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
3.
HickmanJ. S.HanowskiR. J.BocanegraJ. (2010). Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: Assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashes (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-049). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
4.
KlauerS.DingusT.NealeV.SudweeksJ.RamseyD. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study data (DOT HS 810 594). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
5.
OlsenR.HanowskiR.HickmanJ.BocanegraJ. (2009). Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-09-0420). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
6.
OwensJ.McLaughlinS.SudweeksJ. (2010). On-road comparison of driving performance measures when using handheld and voice-control interfaces for mobile phones and portable music players (Paper No. SAE-2010-01-0136). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
7.
SayerJ. RDevonshireJ. M.FlanaganC. A. (2005). The effects of secondary tasks on naturalistic driving performance (Report No. UMTRI-2005-29). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
8.
SayerJ. RDevonshireJ. M.FlanaganC. A. (2007). Naturalistic driving performance during secondary tasks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Stevenson, WA. Retrieved from http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/DA2007/PDF/039_SayerDevonshire.pdf
9.
ShutkoJ.MayerK.LaansooE.TijerinaL. (2009). Driver workload effects of cell phone, music player, and text messaging tasks with the Ford SYNC voice interface versus handheld visual-manual interfaces (Paper No. SAE-2009-01-0786). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
10.
YoungR.SchreinerC. (2009). Real-world personal conversations using a hands-free embedded wireless device while driving: Effect on airbag-deployment crash rates. Risk Analysis, 29, 187–204.
