In this article, the authors provide an analysis of the challenges facing researchers as they respond to the ideas that guide family-centered services and incorporate these themes into research focused on improving services for children with emotional, behavioral, or mental disorders and their families. The concept of “family-centered services” has emerged only recently as a generally well understood set of practice principles. Traditional approaches to conducting mental health research have not yet responded to the fundamental changes in thinking about service delivery evoked by a family-centered service system. The authors examine the fit between traditional mental health research and family-centered services and provide an introduction to the articles in this special issue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenR., PetrC. G., & BrownB. F. C. (1995). Family-centered behavior scale and user manual.Lawrence, KS: Beach Center, University of Kansas.
2.
BaileyD. B.Jr. BuysseV., SmithT., & ElamJ. (1992). The effects and perceptions of family involvement in program decisions about family-centered practices.Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 2332.
3.
BickmanL. (1992). Designing outcome evaluations for children's mental health services: Improving internal validity. In BickmanL. (Ed.), Evaluating mental health services for children (pp. 5768). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BurnsB. J. (1994). The challenges of child mental health services research.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2 (4), 254259.
5.
ClarkeR. T., SchaeferM., BurchardJ. D., & WelkowitzJ. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of Project Wraparound.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241262.
6.
EvansM. E., ArmstrongM. I., & KuppingerA. D. (1996). Family-centered intensive case management: A step toward understanding individualized care.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5(1), 5566.
7.
FriesenB. J., & HuffB. (1996). Family perspectives on systems of care, In StroulB. A. (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 4167). Baltimore: Brookes.
8.
FriesenB. J., & KoroloffN. M. (1990). Family-centered services: Implications for mental health administration and research.Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 1325.
9.
FriesenB.J., KoroloffN.M., & KorenP. E. (1993). Family research and demonstration symposium report.Portland, OR: Portland State University, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.
10.
GreenbaumP., DedrickR., PrangeM., & FriedmanR. (1994). Parent, teacher, and child ratings of problem behaviors of youngsters with serious emotional disturbances.Psychological Assessment, 6 (2), 141148.
11.
HandenB. L., FeldmanR. S., & HonigmanA. (1987). Comparison of parent and teacher assessments of developmentally delayed children's behavior.Exceptional Children, 54 (2), 137144.
12.
HarryB. (1996). These families, those families: The impact of researcher identities on the research act.Exceptional Children, 62 (4), 292300.
13.
HenggelerS. W., SchoenwaldS. K., & MungerR. L. (1996). Families and therapists achieve clinical outcomes, systems of care mediate the process.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5 (2), 177183.
14.
HunterR. W., & FriesenB. J. (1996). Family-centered services for children with emotional, behavioral, and mental disorders. In HeflingerC. A., & NixonC. (Eds.), Families and mental health services for children and adolescents (pp. 1840). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
KiresukT. J., & ShermanR. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.Community Mental Health Journal, 4 (6), 443453.
16.
KorenP. E., DeChilloN., & FriesenB. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire.Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305321.
17.
KoroloffN., HunterR., & GordonL. (1995). Family involvement in policy making: A final report on the Families in Action Project.Portland, OR: Portland State University, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.
18.
KytleJ., & MillmanE. J. (1986). Confessions of two applied researchers in search of principles.Evaluation and Program Planning, 9, 167177.
19.
LeafP. (1997). Plenary Panel: Positive examples of researcher-family collaboration. In ExoK. J., & FriesenB. J. (Eds.), Building on family strengths: Research and programs in support of children and their families. 1995 conference proceedings (pp. 6885). Portland, OR: Portland State University, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.
20.
McGonigelM. (1988). Guidelines for family-centered research.Washington, DC: Association for the Care of Children's Health.
21.
PattersonJ. M. (1990). Family and health research in the 1980s: A family scientist's perspective.Family Systems Medicine, 8 (4), 421434.
22.
PattersonJ. M. (1996). Family research methods: Issues and strategies. In HeflingerC. A., & NixonC. (Eds.), Families and mental health services for children and adolescents (pp. 117144). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
RobertsR. N., & MagrabP. R. (1991). Psychologists’ role in a family-centered approach to practice, training, and research with young children.American Psychologist, 46 (1), 144148.
24.
RosenblattA. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5 (1), 101116.
25.
RosenblattA., & AttkissonC. C. (1993). Assessing outcomes for sufferers of severe mental disorder: A conceptual framework and review.Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 347363.
26.
SheltonT. L., JeppsonE. S., & JohnsonB. H. (1987). Family-centered care for children with special health care needs.Washington, DC: Association for the Care of Children's Health.
27.
StroulB. A., & FriedmanR. M. (1986). A system of care for severely emotionally disturbed children and youth (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health.
28.
StroulB. A., McCormackM., & ZaroS. M. (1996). Measuring outcomes in systems of care. In StroulB. A. (Ed.), Children's mental health services: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 313336). Baltimore: Brookes.
29.
SummersJ. A. (1988). Family adjustment: Issues in research on families with developmentally disabled children. In Van HasseltV. B., StrainP. S., & HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental and physical disabilities (pp. 7990). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
30.
TannenN. (1996). A family-designed system of care: Families First in Essex County, New York. In StroulB. A. (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 375388). Baltimore: Brookes.
31.
VanDenBergJ. E., & GrealishE. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5 (1), 722.
32.
WeiszJ. R., HanS. S., & ValeriS. M. (1996). What we can learn from Fort Bragg.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5 (2), 185190.
33.
YoungS. C., NicholsonJ., & DavisM. (1995). An overview of issues in research on consumer satisfaction with child and adolescent mental health services.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4 (2), 219238.
