Suspension and expulsion are widely used to exclude students with and without disabilities who present problem behaviors in school, despite contentious legal debate and evidence associating these methods with high ecological stress and problematic developmental outcomes. Using selected participant data (N = 1,824) from the SEELS study, the study authors entered multilevel predictors into logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with higher likelihood of exclusion (HLE) among students in three high-exclusion disabilitygroups:emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD), other health impairment (OHI) with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and learning disability (LD). When the authors examined disability groups together, HLE was more likely among students with EBD and ADHD compared to students with LD. HLE was also associated with African American ethnicity, older age, male gender, low socio-economic status, multiple school changes, urban schooling, and having parents who expressed low school satisfaction. However, when the authors examined the disability groups individually, predictor profiles varied markedly by disability type.The authors discuss implications for school programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakken, T., & Kortering, L. (1999). The constitutional and statutory obligation of schools to prevent students with disabilities from dropping out. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 360—366.
2.
Bock, S.J., Tapscott, K.T., & Savner, J.L. (1998). Suspension and expulsion: Effective management for students?Intervention in School & Clinic, 34, 50—53.
3.
Cairns, R.B., Cairns, B.D., Rodkin, P., & Xie, H. (1998). New directions in developmental research: Models and methods. In R. Jessor (Ed.), New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior (pp. 13—40). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Christle, C., Nelson, C.M., & Jolivette, K. (2004). School characteristics related to the use of suspension . Education & Treatment of Children, 27(4), 509—526.
5.
Cooley, S. (1995). Suspension/expulsion of regular and special education students in Kansas: A report to the Kansas StateBoard of Education. Topeka, KS: State Board of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395403)
6.
DeRidder, L.M. (1991). How suspension and expulsion contribute to dropping out. The Education Digest, 56(6), 44—47.
7.
Duda, J.L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). After-school sport for children: Implications of a task-involving motivational climate. In J. L. Ma-honey, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 311—330). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Ekstrom, R.B., Goertz, M.E., Pollack, J.M., & Rock, D.A. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87, 357—373.
9.
Fasko, D., Grubb, D., & Osborne, J. (1997). Suspensions of students with and without disabilities: A comparative study. Research in the Schools, 4(1), 45—50.
10.
Fiore, T.A., & Reynolds, K.S. (1996). Analysis of discipline issues in special education. Research Triangle Park, NC : Research Triangle Institute.
11.
Hartwig, E.P., & Ruesch, G.M. (2000). Disciplining students in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 240—247.
12.
Hayden, C. (1994). Primary-age children excluded from school: A multiagency focus for concern. Children & Society, 8(3), 257—273.
13.
Hodapp, R.M., & Krasner, D.V. (1995). Reflections on using large, national databases in special education research. Exceptionality, 5, 109—112.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
17.
Lambert, N.M., Hartsbough, C.S., Sassone, D., & Sandoval, J. (1987). Persistence of hyperactivity symptoms from childhood to adolescence and associated outcomes. The American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry, 57(1), 22—32.
18.
Leone, P.E., Mayer, M.J., Malmgren, K., & Meisel, S.M. (2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality and reasonable balance. Focus onExceptional Children, 33(1), 1—20.
19.
Maag, J.W. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in schools. Exceptional Children , 67(2), 173—186.
20.
Morgan-D'Atrio, C., Northrup, J., LaFleur, L., & Spera, S. (1996). Toward prescriptive alternatives to suspensions: A preliminary evaluation. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 190—200.
21.
Morrison, G.M., & D'Incau, B. (1997). The web of zero-tolerance: Characteristics of students who are recommended for expulsion from school . Education & Treatment of Children, 20(3), 316—335.
22.
Overholser, J., Spirito, A., & DiFilippo, J. (2000). Strategies for measurement and psychological assessment . In D. Drotar (Ed.), Handbook of research in pediatric and clinical child psychology: Practical strategies and methods (pp. 97—117). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
23.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2001 ). Prevention research & the IDEA discipline provisions: A guide for school administrators. Accessed January 26, 2006 , from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/Products/adminbeh.web.pdf
24.
Rabiner, D.L., Coie, J.D., Miller-Johnson, S., Boykin, A.M., & Lochman, J.E. (2005). Predicting the persistence of aggressive offending of African American males from adolescence into young adulthood: The importance of peer relations, aggressive behavior, and ADHD symptoms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 131—140.
25.
Shields, D.L., & Bredemeier, B.J.L. (1995). Character development and physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
26.
Skiba, R. (2002). Special education and school discipline: A precarious balance. Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 81—97.
27.
Skiba, R.J., & Knesting, K. (2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. In R. J. Skiba & G. G. Noam (Eds.), New directions for youth development (No. 92: Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep schools safe? pp. 17—43). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
28.
Skiba, R.J., Michael, R.S., Nardo, A.C., & Peterson, R. (2000). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317—342. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~safeschl/cod.pdf
29.
Skiba, R.J., & Peterson, R.L. (2000). School discipline at a cross-roads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 347—355.
30.
Spss. (2005) SPSS 14.0 Manuals on CD. Chicago: Author.
31.
SRI International. (2002). SEELS home & news. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/grindex.html
32.
SRI International. (2003). The National Longitudinal Transition Study: A summary of findings. Retrieved from http://www.sri.com/policy/cehs/publications/dispub/nlts/nltssum.html
33.
Townsend, B.L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 381—391.
34.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Vol. 1).Washington, DC : Author.
35.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2000). Report of the Surgeon General's conference on children's mental health: A national action agenda. Washington, DC : Author.
36.
Verdugo, R.R. (2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero-tolerance policies. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 50—75.
37.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., & Epstein, M.H. (2005). The Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study and the National Longitudinal Transition Study: Study designs and implications for children and youth with emotional disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 25—41.
39.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., & Cameto, R. (2004). Changes over time in the secondary school experiences of students with disabilities:A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study—2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
40.
Wu, W. (1980). The foundations of student suspension (Research/ technical report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
41.
Wu, S.C., Pink, W.T., Crain, R.L., & Moles, O. (1982). Student suspension: A critical reappraisal. The Urban Review, 14, 245—303.
42.
Yell, M.L., Drasgow, E., & Rozalski, M.E. (2001). Disciplining students with disabilities. Focus onExceptional Children, 33(9), 1—20.
43.
Zhang, D., Katsiyannis, A., & Herbst, M. (2004). Disciplinary exclusions in special education: A four-year analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 337—347.
