A descriptive study of 22 students (K—10th grade) with emotional and behavioral disabilities (EBD) who were referred for functional behavioral assessment (FBA) revealed less on-task and more avoidant and inappropriate behaviors in comparison to classroom peers without EBD. Students who had been diagnosed as having attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and were taking psychotropic medications had higher levels of inappropriate behavior. However, sequential analysis showed that individual variation in teacher and peer attention as consequent events best predicted students' inappropriate behavior. These findings indicate that individual differences in the consequent events that purportedly maintain problem behavior are unique to the student, as proponents of FBA have suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abidin, R.R., & Robinson, L.L. (2002). Stress, biases, or professionalism: What drives teachers' referral judgments of students with challenging behaviors?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 204—212.
2.
Alessi, G. (1988). Direct observation methods for emotional/behavior problems. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Krathochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 14—75). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bakeman, R., Robinson, B.F., & Quera, V. (1996). Testing sequential association: Estimating exact p values using sampled permutations. Psychological Methods , 1, 4—15.
6.
Becker, W.C., Madsen, C.H., Jr., Arnold, C.R., & Thomas, D.R. (1967). The contingent use of teacher attention and praise in reducing classroom behavior problems. The Journal of Special Education,1, 287—307.
7.
Buehler, R.E., Patterson, G.R., & Furness, J.M. (1966). The reinforcement of behavior in institutional settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 4, 157—167.
8.
Bullis, M., & Walker, H. (1994). Comprehensive school-based systems for troubled youth. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Center on Human Development.
9.
Carr, E.G. (1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393—399.
10.
Ervin, R.A., Kern, L., Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., & Friman, P.C. (2000). Evaluating assessment-based intervention strategies for students with ADHD and comorbid disorders within the natural classroom context. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 344—358.
11.
Forness, S.R., & Kavale, K.A. (2001). ADHD and a return to the medical model of special education. Education & Treatment of Children,24, 224—247.
12.
Gravetter, F.J., & Wallnau, F.J. (2004). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
Hall, R.V., Lund, D., & Jackson, D. (1968). Effects of teacher attention on study behavior . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 1—12.
14.
Heckaman, K., Conroy, M., Fox, J., & Chait, A. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 196—210.
15.
Iwata, B.A. (1987). Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: An emerging technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 20, 361—378.
16.
Iwata, B.A., Pace, G.M., Dorsey, M.F., Zarcone, J.R., Vollmer, T.R., Smith, R.G., et al. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215—240.
17.
Jensen, P.S., Hinshaw, S.P., Swanson, J.M., Greenhill, L.L., Conners, C.K., Arnold, L.E., et al. (2001). Findings from the NIMH multimodal treatment study of ADHD. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,22, 60—73.
18.
Lane, K., Umbreit, J., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (1999). Functional assessment research on students with or at risk for EBD: 1990 to the present. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 101—111.
19.
Loeber, R., & Hay, D. (1997). Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annual Review ofPsychology, 48, 371—410.
20.
Lovitt, T.C., Lovitt, A.O., Eaton, M.D., & Kirkwood, M. (1973). The deceleration of inappropriate comments by a natural consequence. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 148—154.
21.
Mace, F.C., & Lalli, J.S. (1991). Linking descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of bizarre speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 553—562.
22.
Madsen, C.H., Jr., & Madsen, C.K. (1981). Teaching discipline: A positive approach for educational development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
National Institutes of Health. (1989, September). Treatment of destructive behaviors. Abstract presented at the National Institutes of Health, Consensus Development Conference, Rockville, MD.
24.
Nelson, J.R., & Roberts, M.L. (2000). Ongoing reciprocal teacher— student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 27—37, 48.
25.
O'Leary, K.D., & Becker, W.C. (1968—1969). The effects of the intensity of a teacher's reprimands on children's behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 7, 8—11.
26.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y.F., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling . Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
28.
Repp, A.C. (1999). Naturalistic functional assessment with regular and special education students in classroom settings. In A. C. Repp & R. H. Horner (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 238—258). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.
Sandler, A.G., Arnold, L.B., Gable, R.A., & Strain, P.S. (1987). Effects of peer pressure on disruptive behavior of behaviorally disordered classmates. Behavioral Disorders,12, 104—110.
30.
Saundergas, R.A., & Lentz, F.E. (1986). Estimating percent of time and rate via direct observation: A suggested observational procedure and format. School Psychology Review, 15, 36—48.
31.
Shores, R.E., Jack, S.L., Gunter, P.L., Ellis, D.N., DeBriere, T.J., & Wehby, J.H. (1993). Classroom interactions of children with behavior disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 27—39.
32.
Thomas, D.R., Becker, W.C., & Armstrong, M. (1968). Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 35—45.
33.
Van Acker, R., Grant, S.H., & Henry, D. (1996). Teacher and student behavior as a function of risk for aggression. Education & Treatment of Children,19, 316—334.
34.
Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., Epstein, M.H., & Sumi, W.C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79—96.
35.
Wehby, J.H., Symons, F.J., & Shores, R.E. (1995). A descriptive analysis of aggressive behavior in classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 87—105.
36.
Yoder, P.J., & Feurer, I.D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events or behaviors. In T. Thompson , D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and application in developmental disabilities (pp. 317—333). Baltimore: Brookes.
