In the current experiment, 32 students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) in Grades 7 through 12 worked on 2 grammar assignments for 15 minutes each. Control assignments contained 15 target tasks (i.e., multisentence paragraphs) that students were required to rewrite and for which they had to provide appropriate punctuation. Experimental (i.e., interspersal) assignments contained 15 matched target tasks and 8 additional brief 1-sentence paragraphs interspersed following every 2nd target paragraph.After working on both assignments, students ranked assignments and then were allowed to choose a new assignment for homework.Although experimental assignments required students to complete more work, no significant differences were found for time and effort rankings and significantly more students chose the interspersal assignment for homework.In addition, discrete task completion rates were significantly higher on the interspersal assignment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Billington, E.J., & Skinner, C.H. (2002). Getting students to prefer to do more work: Evidence of the effectiveness of the interspersal procedure. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 11, 105—116
2.
Cates, G.L., & Skinner, C.H. (2000). Getting remedial math students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersal procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339—347.
3.
Cates, G.L., Skinner, C.H., Watkins, C.E., Rhymer, K.N., McNeill, B.S., & McCurdy, M. (1999). Effects of interspersing additional brief math problems on student performance and perception of math assignments: Getting students to prefer to do more work. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 9, 177—193.
4.
Cooke, N.L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, L.S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213—234.
5.
Coutinho, M.J. (1986). Reading achievement of students identified as behaviorally disordered at the secondary level. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 200—207.
6.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J.C., Hall, R.V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance . In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, J. Trap-Porter , & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58—88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
Gunter, P.L., Denny, R.K., Jack, S.L., Shores, R.E., & Nelson, C.M. (1993). Aversive stimuli in academic interactions between students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 265—274.
8.
Herrnstein, R.J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis ofBehavior, 4, 267— 272.
9.
Kern, L., Childs, K.E., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G.D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7—19.
10.
Logan, P., & Skinner, C.H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event?School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322—331.
11.
Mace, F.C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E.A. (1990). A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197—205.
12.
Martens, B.K., & Houk, J.L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis ofBehavior, 51, 17—27.
13.
Martens, B.K., Lochner, D.G., & Kelly, S.Q. (1992). The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 143—151.
14.
Martin, J.J., Skinner, C.H., & Neddenriep, C.E. (2001). Extending research on the interspersal procedure to perceptions of continuous reading assignments: Applied and theoretical implications of a failure to replicate. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 391— 400.
15.
McCurdy, M., Skinner, C.H., Grantham, K., Watson, T.S., & Hindman, P.M. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during math seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23—32.
16.
Meadows, S., & Skinner, C.H. (2002, May). Interspersing additional brief English tasks: Enhancing the educational validity of the interspersal procedure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Toronto, Canada.
17.
Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367—380.
18.
Neef, N.A., Mace, F.C., Shea, M.C., & Shade, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extension of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691—699.
19.
Neef, N.A., Shade, D., & Miller, M.S. (1994). Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 27, 575—583.
20.
Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. New York : Oxford University Press.
21.
Pierce, J.S. (1998). Sensitivity of adolescents with behavioral disorders to discrepancies between rules and contingencies. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(7-B), 3932.
22.
Ragno, N.N., Toth, M.D., & Gray, B.G. (1996). World of language: Level three. Needham, MA: Silver Burdett Ginn.
23.
Roberts, M.L., & Shapiro, E.S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73—91.
24.
Roberts, M.L., Turco, T.L., & Shapiro, E.S. (1991). Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 303—318.
25.
Rosenberg, M.S., Wilson, R., Maheady, L., & Sindelar, P.T. (1997). Educating students with behavior disorders. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Skinner, C.H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Watson & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy: Ecological considerations in assessment, treatment, and evaluation (pp. 451—474). New York: Plenum.
27.
Skinner, C.H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis . Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347—368.
28.
Skinner, C.H., Belfiore, P.J., Mace, H.W., Williams, S., & Johns, G.A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly , 12, 54—64.
29.
Skinner, C.H., Fletcher, P.A., Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313—325.
30.
Skinner, C.H., Fletcher, P.A., Wildmon, M., & Belfiore, P.J. (1996). Improving assignment preference through interspersal: Problem completion rates versus easy problems. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 6, 427— 437.
31.
Skinner, C.H., Hurst, K.L., Teeple, D.F., & Meadows, S.O. (2002). Increasing on-task behavior during math independent seatwork in students with emotional disturbance by interspersing additional brief problems. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 647—659.
32.
Skinner, C.H., Robinson, S.L., Johns, G.A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P.J. (1996). Applying Herrnstein's matching law to influence students' choice to complete difficult assignments . The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5—17.
33.
Skinner, C.H., & Shapiro, E.S. (1989). A comparison of a taped-word and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123—133.
34.
Slate, J.R., & Saudargas, R.A. (1986). Difference in the classroom behaviors of behaviorally disordered and regular class children. Behavioral Disorders, 3, 45—53.
35.
Sprague, J., Sugai, G., & Walker, H. (1998). Antisocial behavior in schools. In T. S. Watson & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy: Ecological considerations in assessment, treatment, and evaluation (pp. 451—474). New York: Plenum.
36.
Tennessee State Department of Education. ( 1993). Special education manual (No. 331033). Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education, Division of Special Education.
37.
Toth, M.D., Ragno, N.N., & Gray, B.G. (1996). World of language: Level four. Needham, MA: Silver Burdett Ginn.
38.
Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in schools: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
39.
Wildmon, M.E., Skinner, C.H., McCurdy, M., & Sims, S. (1999). Improved secondary students' perception of the “dreaded math word problem assignment” by giving them more word problems. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 319—325.
40.
Wildmon, M.E., Skinner, C.H., Watson, T.S., & Garrett, L.S. (in press). Enhancing assignment perceptions in students with mathematics learning disabilities by including more work: An extension of interspersal research. School Psychology Quarterly.
41.
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O'Neal, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105—109.
