An assessment of the usefulness of a taxonomy of design requirements for manufacture is presented. The taxonomy describes the various issues that manufacturing imposes on the design of a product. The requirements themselves can be entered into this taxonomy at the appropriate level. The usefulness of this taxonomy is shown experimentally to determine whether the benefits of using it are worth the work it necessitates. The three-level taxonomy is relatively complete, perceptually orthogonal, and consistent in its level of abstractness. All of these factors constitute a sound taxonomy. Use of the taxonomy led to a greater number of requirements which were, overall, much more useful to the development of a quality product.
Hauser, J.R. and D. Clausing.1988. "The House of Quality ," Harvard Business Review , May-June.
5.
King, B.1987. "Listening to the Voice of the Customer: Using the Quality Function Deployment System." National Productivity Review . Summer.
6.
Scollard, W.E.1988. "Putting QFD to Work,"Taguchi Methods and QFD: Hows and Whys for Management, Nancy Ryan (Ed.), ASI Press, MI.
7.
Gershenson, J.A., D.V. Khadilkar and L.A. Stauffer.1994. "Organizing and Managing Customer Requirements During the Product Definition Phase of Design," Proceeding of the Sixth ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Minneapolis, MN, September 11-14, 1994.
8.
Barkan, P.1988. "Simultaneous Engineering: AI Helps Balance Production and Bottom Lines," Design News, Vol. 44, No. 5, March, p. A30.
9.
Prasad, B.1996. Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals . London : The Design Council and New York: Prentice Hall, Volume 1.
10.
Khadilkar, D.V.1995. Development, Implementation, and Validation of a Methodology for Organizing Product Definition Information, Ph.D. DissertationUniversity of Idaho.
11.
Stauffer, L.A. , L.J. Morris and D.V. Khadilkar.1996. "A Computerized Database to Assist QFD,"Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Quality Function Deployment and International Symposium on QFD '96, Novi, MI, June 9-11.
12.
Gershenson, J.K. and L.A. Stauffer.1999. "The Validation of a Taxonomy for Manufacturability Design Requirements," To appear in the Journal of Research in Engineering Design .
13.
Stauffer, L.A. and R.A. Slaughterbeck-Hyde.1989. " The Nature of Constraints and Their Effect on Quality and Satisficing." Proceedings of the 1989 ASME Design Technical Conferences-1st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Montreal, Quebec, Canada .
14.
Baya, B. and L.J. Leifer.1994. "A Study of the Information Handling Behavior of Designers During Conceptual Design" Proceedings of the 1994 ASME Design Technical Conferences-6th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Minneapolis, MN.
15.
Ullman, D.G.1989. "A Taxonomy of Mechanical Design." Proceedings of the 1989 ASME Design Technical Conferences-1st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
16.
Dunn, G. and B.S. Everitt.1982. An Introduction to Mathematical Taxonomy . Cambridge University Press. N.Y.
17.
Derr, R.L.1973. A Taxonomy of Social Purposes of Public Schools . David McKay Company, Inc. N.Y.
18.
Jeffrey, C.1982. An Introduction to Plant Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press. New York, N.Y .
19.
Bralla, J.G.1986. Handbook of Product Design for Manufacturing . McGraw-Hill Book Co. N.Y.
20.
Gershenson, J.K. and L.A. Stauffer.1996. "The Validation of a Taxonomy for Manufacturability Design Requirements," Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Irvine, CA, August 18-22.
21.
Hauge, P. and L.A. Stauffer.1993. "ELK: A Method for Eliciting Knowledge from Customers," Proceedings of the Fifth ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Albuquerque, NM, September 13-16, 1993.
22.
Welkowitz, J. , R.B. Ewen and J. Cohen.1971. Introductory Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press. N.Y.
