This study examines the productivity of excavation and haulage equipment in overburden removal operations at the Borneo Indobara site, with a primary focus on optimizing front-loading geometry, improving material flow, and enhancing equipment performance through advanced modeling and real-time monitoring. Particular emphasis was placed on the optimization of front-loading geometry, material flow dynamics, and equipment configurations to enhance overall operational efficiency and reduce inefficiencies across excavation cycles. A novel framework integrating machine learning, metaheuristic algorithms, and IoT-enabled real-time monitoring was implemented to predict productivity, improve bucket fill factors, and reduce cycle times. Results demonstrated that optimal front dimensions and innovative loading patterns significantly increased productivity. Gradient Boosting and Particle Swarm Optimization were employed for precise modeling and resource allocation, while dynamic simulations validated the proposed solutions. The findings highlight the potential for advanced data-driven methods to mitigate inefficiencies and enhance performance in open-pit mining operations.
BarakatGD’agatiLTricomiG, et al. (2024) Discrete event modeling and simulation approaches for IIoT. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics21: 2456–2463. DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.202.
2.
BbumbaSKigoziMKarumeI, et al. (2025) Prediction and optimization of process parameters using artificial intelligence and machine learning models. Asian Journal of Applied Chemistry Research16(1): 11–33. DOI: 10.9734/ajacr/2025/v16i1317.
3.
BiQWangGWangY, et al. (2020) Digging trajectory optimization for cable shovel robotic excavation based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Energies13: 3118. DOI: 10.3390/en13123118.
4.
ChimunhuPTopalEAsadMWA, et al. (2024) The future of underground mine planning in the era of machine learning: opportunities for engineering robustness and flexibility. Mining Technology: Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy133(4): 331–347. DOI: 10.1177/25726668241281875.
5.
ChoiYNguyenHBuiXN, et al. (2021) Estimating ore production in open-pit mines using various machine learning algorithms based on a truck-haulage system and support of internet of things. Natural Resources Research30: 1141–1173. DOI: 10.1007/S11053-020-09766-5.
6.
CostaTPDACostaDMBDAMurphyF (2024) A systematic review of real-time data monitoring and its potential application to support dynamic life cycle inventories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review105: 107416. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107416.
7.
DwivediSTorresRDSHameedIA, et al. (2022) An investigation of contemporary data-driven methods applied to complex systems. IEEE Access10: 134744–134757. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232278.
8.
FanCZhangNJiangB, et al. (2023) Using deep neural networks coupled with principal component analysis for ore production forecasting at open-pit mines. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering16: 727, 740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.06.005.
9.
FanCZhangNJiangB, et al. (2024) Using deep neural networks coupled with principal component analysis for ore production forecasting at open-pit mines. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering16(3): 727–740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.06.005.
10.
GalatroDDaweS (2024) Optimization. In: GalatroDDaweS (eds) Data Analytics for Process Engineers. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland (Synthesis Lectures on Mechanical Engineering), 117–137. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-46866-7_5.
11.
GuanWChenZWangS, et al. (2022) A deep learning approach for construction vehicles fill factor estimation and bucket detection in extreme environments. Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure38: 1857–1878. DOI: 10.1111/mice.12952.
12.
GuanWWangSChenZ, et al. (2023) A bucket fill factor estimation method in construction environments by fusing deep learning and machine vision. Journal of Cleaner Production426: 139094. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139094.
13.
KambleSSGunasekaranAGawankarSA, et al. (2021) A performance measurement system for industry 4.0-enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs – A review and empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change173: 121117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121117
14.
KılıçCÇetinKÖzbekME (2024) AN industrial application of digital twin for a smart factory model using coppeliasim. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry8(3): 316–325. DOI: 10.46519/ij3dptdi.1452734.
15.
KujundžićTKlanfarMKormanT, et al. (2021) Influence of crushed rock properties on the productivity of a hydraulic excavator. Applied Sciences11: 2345. DOI: 10.3390/APP11052345.
16.
KululaMIAkandeJM (2018) Effects of machine parameter and natural factors on the productivity of loading and haulage equipment. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering6: 139–153. DOI: 10.4236/JMMCE.2018.61011.
17.
LachvajderováLTrebuňaMKádárováJ (2024) Unlocking industry potential: the evolution and impact of digital twins. Acta Mechanica Slovaca28(1): 46–51. DOI: 10.21496/ams.2024.009.
18.
LiuX (2024) Optimization of sewage treatment processes: process control based on artificial intelligence. Applied and Computational Engineering93(1): 185–190. DOI: 10.54254/2755-2721/93/20240981.
19.
MahankaliR (2025) Digital twins and enterprise architecture: a framework for real-time manufacturing decision support. International Journal of Computer Engineering &Technology16(1): 578–587. DOI: 10.34218/IJCET_16_01_049.
20.
MakhmudovSM (2023) Methodology for calculating the performance and functionality of quarry excavators. Journal of science and innovative development6: 16–23. DOI: 10.36522/2181-9637-2023-1-3.
21.
MasudMAAAraiaAWangY, et al. (2025) Machine learning‐aided process design using limited experimental data: a microwave‐assisted ammonia synthesis case study. AIChE Journal71(1): e18621. DOI: 10.1002/aic.18621.
22.
MonekG.D.FischerS. (2025) Expert twin: a digital twin with an integrated fuzzy-based decision-making module. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering8(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.31181/dmame8120251181.
23.
MoreYY (2024) Implementation of industry 4.0 and digital manufacturing practices in Indian manufacturing industries using discrete event simulation (DES). Panamerican Mathematical Journal33(3): 86–107. DOI: 10.52783/pmj.v33.i3.883.
24.
MunyadzweDBMambaNBSugloRS (2020) Evaluating productivity management of materials handling system at mempeasem gold mine. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science5: 948–954. DOI: 10.24018/EJERS.2020.5.8.1991.
25.
PriyaLVasoyaABoopathiC, et al. (2023) Evaluating dynamics, security, and performance metrics for smart manufacturing. The Scientific Temper14(04): 1264–1270. DOI: 10.58414/SCIENTIFICTEMPER.2023.14.4.30.
26.
QureshiMSFayazM (2020) Time and cost efficient cloud resource allocation for real-time data-intensive smart systems. Energies13(21): 5706. DOI: 10.3390/en13215706.
27.
RachmanTAFirdausMI (2024) Analysis of heavy equipment management based on cost and time values in the local road improvement project package 6. Jurnal Teknik Sipil24: 1160. DOI: 10.26418/jts.v24i3.82050.
28.
SakhareMVD (2024) Enhanced Construction Productivity by Effective Equipment Management through Fleet Operations. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2024.61889.
29.
SanjayaHTHutapeaROM (2022) Geometri jalan angkut dan jari-jari tikungan menggunakan teori aashto pada pt pro intertech Indonesia kota sorong provinsi papua barat. INTAN Jurnal Penelitian Tambang3: 98–102. DOI: 10.56139/intan.v3i2.60.
30.
SaputroCD (2023) Analisis produktivitas kombinasi alat berat pada pekerjaan galian tebing proyek pembangunan jjls tepus – jerukwudel gunungkidul. JCEBT (Journal of Civil Engineering, Building and Transportation)7: 96–102. DOI: 10.31289/jcebt.v7i1.8451.
31.
SethumadhavanRRenatoRM (2024) Smart resource allocation in enterprises using AI and IoE. In: PandeyD (ed), Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics. IGI Global, 409–422. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1032-9.ch026.
32.
ShanmugapriyaMManivannanD (2024) IoT-Based Predictive Analytics in Supply Chain Management for Enhanced Operational Efficiency. In: PrasadM. K.YildirimM. (eds). Challenges and Applications of Data Analytics in Social Perspectives. IGI Global, 183–199. Available at: https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/351749.
33.
TyagiAKRichaR (2023) Smart manufacturing using internet of things, artificial intelligence, and digital twin technology. In: HabibMK (ed) Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics. IGI Global, 184–205. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7791-5.ch008.
34.
ZhaoQGaoLWuD, et al. (2024) E-GTN: advanced terrain sensing framework for enhancing intelligent decision making of excavators. Applied Sciences14: 6974. DOI: 10.3390/app14166974.
35.
ZhengHMirlekarGNordL (2022) Agent-based and stochastic optimization incorporated with machine learning for simulation of postcombustion CO2 capture process. Processes10(12): 2727. DOI: 10.3390/pr10122727.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
