Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, a novel model called Function Deployment Model (FDM) for decision making in new product development is introduced. To demonstrate its usefulness pragmatically, the model is applied to the design problem of development of the micro/nano injection molding machine. Based on the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) technique, this model translates the customer needs to engineering characteristics. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to prioritize customer requirements while a Linear Programing (LP) optimization method is used to determine the feasible solution of the design variables within limited resources. Also, a program with a tailor-made graphical user interface (GUI) using MATLAB library and Microsoft Component Object Model (COM) technology is implemented to guide the design engineers to employ the proposed methodology for decision making.

Keywords

new product development decision making quality function deployment function deployment model analytic hierarchy process

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akao, Y. (1990). Quality Function Deployment, Cambridge: Productivity Press .

Rosenau, M. D. (1996). The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, New York: Wiley .

Pugh, S. (1991). Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, England: Addison-Wesley .

Chan, L. K. and Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review , European Journal of Operational Research, 143: 463-497 .

Prasad, B. (2000). A Concurrent Function Deployment Technique for a Workgroup-based Engineering Design Process , Journal of Engineering Design, 11: 103-119 .

Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals, New York: Prentice Hall .

Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems, Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers .

Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality Engineering using Robust Design, New York: Prentice Hall .

Iranmanesh, S. H. , Thomson, V. and Salimi, M. H. (2005). Design Parameter Estimation using a Modified QFD Method to Improve Customer Perception , Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 13: 57-67 .

10.

Yang, C. C. C. and Naikan, V. N. A. (2003). Optimum Tolerance Design for Complex Assemblies using Hierarchical Interval Constraint Networks , Computers & Industrial Engineering, 45: 511-543 .

11.

Buyukpzkan, G. and Feyzioglu, O. (2004). A Fuzzy-logic-based Decision-making Approach for New Product Development , International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1): 27-45 .

12.

Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic Design, New York: Oxford University Press .

13.

Langford, J. and McDonagh, D. (2003). Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development, New York: Taylor & Francis .

14.

Sandelands, E. (1994). Designing for Customer Satisfaction , Management Decision, 32(5): 37-38 .

15.

Temponi, C. , Yen, J. and Tiao, W. A. (1999). House of Quality: A Fuzzy Logic-based Requirements Analysis , European Journal of Operational Research, 117: 340-354 .

16.

Griffin, A. and Hauser, J. R. (1993). The Voice of the Customer , Marketing Science, 12: 1-27 .

17.

Newman, R. G. (1998). QFD Involves Buyers/Suppliers , Purchasing World, 32(10): 91-93 .

18.

Gershenson, J. K. and Stauffer, L. A. (1999). A Taxonomy for Design Requirements from Corporate Customers , Journal of Research in Engineering Design, 11(2): 103-115 .

19.

Morris, L. J. and Stauffer, L. A. (1994). A Design Taxonomy for Eliciting Customer Requirements , Computers & Industrial Engineering, 27(1-4): 557-560 .

20.

Pullman, M. E. , Moore, W. L. and Wardell, D. G. (2002). A Comparison of Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis in New Product Design , The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5): 354-364 .

21.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill .

22.

Ayag, Z (2005). A Fuzzy AHP-based Simulation Approach to Concept Evaluation in a NPD Environment , IIE Transactions, 37: 827-842

23.

Chuang, P. T. (2001). Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Quality Function Deployment for a Location Decision from a Requirement Perspective , The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18(11): 842-849 .

24.

Akiyama, K. (1991). Function Analysis: Systematic Improvement of Quality and Performance, Massachusetts: Productivity Press .

25.

Pahl, G. (1996). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, London: Springer .

26.

Saulovich, G. (2002). 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Innovation, MA: Technical Innovation Center .

27.

Papalambros, P. Y. and Wilde, D. J. (2000). Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation, New York: Cambridge .

28.

Lee, C. E. and Hsu, S. C. (2004). Outsourcing Capacity Planning for an IC Design House , The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(3): 306-320 .

29.

Ulrich, K. (1995). The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm , Research Policy, 24(3): 419-440 .

Application of Function Deployment Model in Decision Making for New Product Development

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References