Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on how health care affects patient health and well-being and represent a patient-centered approach. Despite this potential, PROs are not widely used in clinical settings. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 3 stakeholder groups (patients, providers, and health care administrators) to determine the top 5 perceived barriers and benefits of PRO implementation. The Delphi technique was employed to obtain consensus and rank order responses. Patients perceived survey length to be important, whereas providers and administrators perceived time to collect data and patient health literacy, respectively, as the greatest barriers to PRO implementation. The greatest perceived benefits were the ability to track changes in clinical symptoms over time, improved quality of care, and better disease control among patients, providers, and administrators, respectively. These results may guide the development of novel frameworks for PRO implementation by addressing perceived barriers and building on the perceived benefits to encourage adoption of PROs.

Keywords

patient-reported outcome measures focus groups Delphi technique

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.

Smith

Street

. On the uses of routine patient-reported health outcome data. Health Econ. 2013;22:119-131.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS Quality Measure Development Plan: Supporting the Transition to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Models (APMs). Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2016.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Oncology care model. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/oncology-care/. Accessed October 18, 2016.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Comprehensive care for joint replacement model. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/CJR. Accessed October 14, 2016.

Valderas

Kotzeva

Espallargues

et al . The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179-193.

Chen

Hollis

. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:211.

Marshall

Haywood

Fitzpatrick

. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559-568.

Boyce

Browne

Greenhalgh

. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:508-518.

10.

Black

. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.

11.

Lavallee

Chenok

Love

et al . Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:575-582.

12.

Alten

Pohl

Choy

et al . Developing a construct to evaluate flares in rheumatoid arthritis: a conceptual report of the OMERACT RA Flare Definition Working Group. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1745-1750.

13.

Kunneman

Pieterse

Stiggelbout

Marijnen

. Which benefits and harms of preoperative radiotherapy should be addressed? A Delphi consensus study among rectal cancer patients and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114:212-217.

14.

Ware

Jr Sherbourne

. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.

15.

Jones

Harding

Berry

Wiklund

Chen

Kline Leidy

. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:648-654.

16.

RAND Corporation. Delphi method. http://www.rand.org/topics/delphi-method.html. Accessed December 1, 2016.

17.

Aaronson

Elliott

Greenhalgh

et al . User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomesassessment in clinical practice. Version 2: January 2015. http://www.isoqol.org/UserFiles/2015UsersGuide-Version2.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2016.

18.

Cella

Yount

Rothrock

et al . The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5, suppl 1):S3-S11.

19.

Dawson

Doll

Fitzpatrick

Jenkinson

Carr

. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010;340:c186.

20.

Segal

Holve

Sabharwal

. Collecting and using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR): challenges and opportunities. http://www.academyhealth.org/publications/2013-07/collecting-and-using-patient-reported-outcomes-pro-comparative-effectiveness. Accessed October 19, 2016.