Although the value of interprofessional collaborative education has been promoted, it is unclear how teams of clinical and nonclinical learners perceive this experience. The authors studied an interprofessional quality improvement (QI) curriculum implemented in 2013 integrating internal medicine residents (n = 90) and Master of Public Health (MPH) students (n = 33) at an urban safety net academic medical center. Pre and post curriculum surveys assessed attitudes toward QI and interprofessional education and team performance. Resident attitudes toward learning and engaging in QI work improved at the end of the curriculum. Overall, MPH students demonstrated significantly more positive attitudes about interprofessional learning and work than residents. They also agreed more strongly than residents that patients would benefit if residents and public health students worked together. As health care organizations evolve to become more integrated, it is crucial that interprofessional educational opportunities be developed and evaluated to help encourage a culture of collaboration among health care providers.
GiordanoCUmlandELyonsKJ. Attitudes of faculty and students in medicine and the health professions toward interprofessional education. J Allied Health. 2012;41(1):21-25.
7.
WeigelCSuenWGupteG. Using lean methodology to teach quality improvement to internal medicine residents at a safety net hospital. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28:392-399.
8.
ReidRBruceDAllstaffKMcLernonD. Validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL?Med Educ. 2006;40:415-422.
9.
HallP. Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(suppl 1):188-196.
10.
PaylerJMeyerEHumphrisD. Pedagogy for interprofessional education—what do we know and how can we evaluate it?Learning in Health and Social Care. 2008;7:64-78.
11.
LangleyGJMoenRNolanKMNolanTWNormanCLProvostLP. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
12.
MorrisonLHeadrickLOgrincGFosterT. The quality improvement knowledge application tool: an instrument to assess knowledge application in practice-based learning and improvement. Paper presented at: Society of General Internal Medicine meeting; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; May7, 2003.
13.
OgrincGHeadrickLAMorrisonLJFosterT. Teaching and assessing resident competence in practice-based learning and improvement. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 pt 2):496-500.
14.
TessAVYangJJSmithCCFawcettCMBatesCKReynoldsEE. Combining clinical microsystems and an experiential quality improvement curriculum to improve residency education in internal medicine. Acad Med. 2009;84:326-334.
15.
ParsellGBlighJ. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ. 1999;33:95-100.
16.
ThompsonBMLevineREKennedyF. Evaluating the quality of learning-team processes in medical education: development and validation of a new measure. Acad Med. 2009;84(10 suppl):S124-S127.
17.
ZwarensteinMGoldmanJReevesS. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD000072.
McPhersonKHeadrickLMossF. Working and learning together: good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?Qual Health Care. 2001;10(suppl 2):ii46-ii53.
20.
VarkeyPRellerMKSmithAPontoJOsbornM. An experiential interdisciplinary quality improvement education initiative. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:317-322.
21.
VarkeyPKarlapudiSP. Lessons learned from a 5-year experience with a 4-week experiential quality improvement curriculum in a preventive medicine fellowship. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;1:93-99.
22.
WongBMEtchellsEEKuperALevinsonWShojaniaKG. Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2010;85:1425-1439.
23.
CurranVRSharpeDForristallJFlynnK. Attitudes of health sciences students towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2008;7:146-156.
24.
RobinsonMCottrellD. Health professionals in multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams: changing professional practice. J Interprof Care. 2005;19:547-560.
25.
ReeseDJSontagMA. Successful interprofessional collaboration on the hospice team. Health Soc Work. 2001;26:167-175.
26.
MaeshiroRJohnsonIKooD. Medical education for a healthier population: reflections on the Flexner Report from a public health perspective. Acad Med. 2010;85:211-219.
27.
VardaDShoupJAMillerS. A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: implications for public health practice and research. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:564-571.
28.
HorsburghMLamdinRWilliamsonE. Multiprofessional learning: the attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning. Med Educ. 2001;35:876-883.
29.
PetrieHG. Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. J Aesthetic Educ. 1976;10(1):29-43.
30.
ItanoJKWilliamsJDeatonMDOishiN. Impact of a student interdisciplinary oncology team project. J Cancer Educ. 1991;6:219-226.
31.
HallPWeaverL. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Med Educ. 2001;35:867-875.
32.
LosekeDRCahillSE. Actors in search of a character: student social workers’ quest for professional identity. Symbolic Interaction. 1986;9:245-258.
33.
HertweckMHawkinsSBednarekMGorecznyASchreiberJSterrettS. Attitudes toward interprofessional education: comparing physician assistant and other health care professions students. J Physician Assist Educ. 2012;23(2):8-15.
34.
WilhelmssonMPonzerSDahlgrenLOTimpkaTFaresjöT. Are female students in general and nursing students more ready for teamwork and interprofessional collaboration in healthcare?BMC Med Educ. 2011;11(1):15.
35.
FoxMF. Women, science, and academia: graduate education and careers. Gender Society. 2001;15:654-666.
36.
BloomBSKrathwohlDR. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay; 1956.
37.
KirkpatrickDLKirkpatrickJD. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2006.
38.
KnowlesMS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Vol 41. New York, NY: New York Association Press; 1970.
39.
GebbieKRosenstockLHernandezLM. Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
