This article reports on a resident-led quality improvement program to improve communication between inpatient internal medicine residents and their patients’ primary care physicians (PCPs). The program included education on care transitions, standardization of documentation, audit and feedback of documented PCP communication rates with public reporting of performance, rapid-cycle data analysis and improvement projects, and a financial incentive. At baseline, PCP communication was documented in 55% of patients; after implementation of the intervention, communication was documented in 89.3% (2477 of 2772) of discharges during the program period. The program was associated with a significant increase in referring PCP satisfaction with communication at hospital admission (baseline, 27.7% “satisfied” or “very satisfied”; postintervention, 58.2%; P < .01) but not at discharge (baseline, 14.9%; postintervention, 21.8%; P = .41). Residents cited the importance of PCP communication for patient care and audit and feedback of their performance as the principal drivers of their engagement in the project.
BoonyasaiRTWindishDMChakrabortiCFeldmanLSRubinHRBassEB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:1023-1037.
2.
Unmet Needs: Teaching Physicians to Provide Safe Patient Care. Report of the National Patient Safety Foundation, National Patient Safety Foundation. Boston, MA: Lucian Leape Institute of the National Patient Safety Foundation; 2010.
3.
BerwickDMFinkelsteinJA. Preparing medical students for the continual improvement of health and health care: Abraham Flexner and the new “public interest.”Acad Med. 2010;85(9 suppl):S56-S65.
4.
WeinbergerSEPereiraAGIobstWFMechaberAJBronzeMS; Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force II. Competency-based education and training in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:751-756.
5.
KimCSLukelaMPParekhVI. Teaching internal medicine residents quality improvement and patient safety: a lean thinking approach. Am J Med Qual. 2010;25:211-217.
6.
StevensDPBowenJLJohnsonJK. A multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform education for chronic illness care in resident continuity practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(suppl 4):S574-S580.
7.
WarmEJSchauerDPDiersT. The ambulatory long-block: an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) educational innovations project (EIP). J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:921-926.
8.
OylerJVinciLAroraVJohnsonJ. Teaching internal medicine residents quality improvement techniques using the ABIM’s practice improvement modules. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:927-930.
9.
WongBMEtchellsEEKuperALevinsonWShojaniaKG. Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2010;85:1425-1439.
10.
IglehartJK. Financing graduate medical education–mounting pressure for reform. N Engl J Med. 2012;366: 1562-1563.
11.
ZeltserMVSchankerBD. Editorial: engaging trainees in health care improvement throughout medical education. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27:366-368.
12.
KripalaniSJacksonATSchnipperJLColemanEA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:314-323.
13.
KripalaniSLeFevreFPhillipsCOWilliamsMVBasaviahPBakerDW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297:831-841.
14.
GreenMLAagaardEMCaverzagieKJ. Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1:5-20.
NascaTJPhilibertIBrighamTFlynnTC. The next GME accreditation system: rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051-1056.
17.
VidyarthiARBaronRB. Financial incentives for residents and fellows: a disruptive innovation to drive quality improvement. Acad Med. 2011;86:1338.
18.
ShojaniaKGGrimshawJM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:138-150.
19.
OxmanADThomsonMADavisDAHaynesRB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995;153:1423-1431.
20.
WongBMLevinsonWShojaniaKG. Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions. Med Educ. 2012;46:107-119.
21.
PatowCAKarpovichKRiesenbergLA. Residents’ engagement in quality improvement: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2009;84:1757-1764.
22.
ScottDRWeimerMEnglishC. A novel approach to increase residents’ involvement in reporting adverse events. Acad Med. 2011;86:742-746.
23.
PinesJMReiserRCBradyWJ. The effect of performance incentives on resident documentation in an emergency medicine residency program. J Emerg Med. 2007;32:315-319.
24.
RothbergMBBenjaminEMLindenauerPK. Public reporting of hospital quality: recommendations to benefit patients and hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:541-545.
25.
FlodgrenGEcclesMPShepperdSScottAParmelliEBeyerFR. An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD009255.
26.
IversNJamtvedtGFlottorpS. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(6):CD000259.
