Two complications of central venous catheterization (CVC), iatrogenic pneumothorax and central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), have dedicated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Despite increasing use of ICD-9-CM codes for research and pay-for-performance purposes, their validity for detecting complications of CVC has not been established. Complications of CVCs placed between July 2010 and December 2011 were identified by ICD-9-CM codes in discharge records from a single hospital and compared with those revealed by medical record abstraction. The ICD-9-CM code for iatrogenic pneumothorax had a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5%. The ICD-9-CM codes for CLABSI had a sensitivity of 33.3%, specificity of 99.0%, PPV of 28.6%, and NPV of 99.2%. The low sensitivity and variable PPV of ICD-9-CM codes for detection of complications of CVC raise concerns about their use for research or pay-for-performance purposes.
AyasNTNorenaMWongHChittockDDodekPM. Pneumothorax after insertion of central venous catheters in the intensive care unit: association with month of year and week of month. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:252-255.
2.
ZhanCSmithMStryerD. Accidental iatrogenic pneumothorax in hospitalized patients. Med Care. 2006;44:182-186.
3.
ZhanCMillerMR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290:1868-1874.
4.
PittetDTararaDWenzelRP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1994;271:1598-1601.
5.
O’GradyNPAlexanderMBurnsLA. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(4suppl 1):S1-34.
6.
PronovostPNeedhamDBerenholtzS. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725-2732.
7.
HindDCalvertNMcWilliamsR. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327:361.
8.
KarakitsosDLabropoulosNDe GrootE. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R162.
9.
CalvertNHindDMcWilliamsRGThomasSMBeverleyCDavidsonA. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(12):1-84.
10.
McDonaldKMRomanoPSGeppertJ. Measures of Patient Safety Based on Hospital Administrative Data: The Patient Safety Indicators (Report No. 02-0038). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2013 rates; hospitals’ resident caps for graduate medical education payment purposes; quality reporting requirements for specific providers and for ambulatory surgical centers. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2012;77:53257-53750.
van WalravenCBennettCForsterAJ. Administrative database research infrequently used validated diagnostic or procedural codes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1054-1059.
16.
MoehringRWStaheliRMillerBAChenLFSextonDJAndersonDJ. Central line-associated infections as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospital-acquired condition versus standard infection control surveillance: why hospital compare seems conflicted. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:238-244.
17.
ChenQRosenAKCevascoM. Detecting patient safety indicators: how valid is “foreign body left during procedure” in the Veterans Health Administration?J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:977-983.
18.
CevascoMBorzeckiAMChenQShinMItaniKMBorzeckiAM. Positive predictive value of the AHRQ patient safety indicator “postoperative sepsis”: implications for practice and policy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:954-961.
19.
BorzeckiAMCevascoMChenQShinMItaniKMRosenAK. Improving identification of postoperative respiratory failure missed by the patient safety indicator algorithm. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28:315-323.
20.
KaafaraniHMBorzeckiAMItaniKM. Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:924-934.
21.
WhiteRHSadeghiBTancrediDJ. How valid is the ICD-9-CM based AHRQ patient safety indicator for postoperative venous thromboembolism?Med Care. 2009;47:1237-1243.
22.
SadeghiBBaronRZrelakP. Cases of iatrogenic pneumothorax can be identified from ICD-9-CM coded data. Am J Med Qual. 2010;25:218-224.
23.
CevascoMBorzeckiAMO’BrienWJ. Validity of the AHRQ patient safety indicator “central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections.”J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:984-990.
24.
PatrickSWDavisMMSedmanAB. Accuracy of hospital administrative data in reporting central line-associated bloodstream infections in newborns. Pediatrics. 2013;131(suppl 1):S75-S80.
25.
ShermanERHeydonKHJohnKHSt. Administrative data fail to accurately identify cases of healthcare-associated infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:332-337.
26.
GrahamASOzmentCTegtmeyerKLaiSBranerDA. Videos in clinical medicine. Central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):e21.
