Internet-based secure communication portals (portal) have the potential to enhance patient care via improved patient–provider communications. This study examines differences among primary care patients’ perceptions when contemplating using, enrolling to use, and using a portal for health care purposes. A total of 3 groups of patients from 1 Midwestern academic medical center were surveyed at different points in time: (1) Waiting Room survey asking about hypothetical interest in using a portal to communicate with their physicians; (2) patient portal Enrollment survey; and (3) Follow-up postenrollment experience survey. Those who enroll and use a patient portal have different demographic characteristics and interest levels in selected portal functions (eg, e-mailing providers, viewing medical records online, making appointments) and initially perceive only limited improvements in care because of the portal. These differences have potential market implications and provide insight into selecting and maintaining portal functions of greater interest to patients who use the portal.
ZhouYYGarridoTChinHLWiesenthalAMLiangLL.Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:418-424.
2.
McGeadyDKujalaJIlvonenK.The impact of patient–physician web messaging on healthcare service provision. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:17-23.
3.
VirjiAYarnallSHKaruseKM. Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication. BMC Med. 2006;4:18.
MolyneauxHO’DonnellSOakleyP. Patient Portal Technologies. Fredericton, NB, Canada: National Research Council; 2009.
8.
WallwienerMWallwienerCWKansyJKSeegerHRajabTK.Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:243-250.
9.
BryneJMElliottSFirekA.Initial experience with patient–clinician secure messaging at a VA medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:267-270.
10.
LinCTWittevrongelLMooreLBeatyBLRossSE.An Internet-based patient–provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e47.
11.
HessRBryceCLPaoneS. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:509-517.
12.
KleinerKDAkersRBurkeBLWernerEJ.Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communications in pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2002;109:740-744.
13.
DentonIC.Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. J Healthc Inf Manage. 2001;15:251-259.
14.
CouchmanGRForjuohSNRascoeTGReisMDKoehlerKWalsumKL.E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients’ expectations for specific test results?Int J Med Inform. 2005;74:21-30.
15.
SittigDFKingSHazlehurstBL.A survey of patient–provider e-mail communication: what do patients think?Int J Med Inform. 2001;61:71-80.
16.
CouchmanGRForjuohSNRascoeTG.E-mail communication in family practice: what do patients expect?J Fam Pract. 2001;50:414-418.
17.
KatzSJMoyerCACoxDTSternDT.Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:736-744.
18.
BergmanDABrownNLWilsonS.Teen use of a patient portal: a qualitative study of parent and teen attitudes. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008;5:13.
19.
AtrejaAMehtaNMillerD. One size does not fit all: using qualitative methods to inform the development of an Internet portal for multiple sclerosis patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:16-20.
20.
BryceCLZickmundSHessR. Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal of management of diabetes. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1035-1043.
21.
EarnestMARossSEWittevrongelLLinC.Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2004;11:410-417.
22.
WinkelmanWJLeonardKJRossosPG.Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2005;12:306-314.
23.
ShawEHowardMChanD. Access to Web-based personalized antenatal health records for pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:38-43.
24.
MathenyMEGandhiTKOravEJ. Impact of an automated test results management system on patients’ satisfaction about test result communication. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2233-2239.
25.
Aldas-ManzanoJLassala-NavarreCRuiz-MafeCSans-BlasS.Key drivers of Internet banking services use. Online Inf Rev. 2009;33:672-695.
26.
LaukkanenPSinkkonenSLaukkanenT.Consumer resistance to Internet banking: postponers, opponents, and rejectors. Int J Bank Manag. 2008;26:440-455.
27.
LichtensteinSWilliamsonK.Understanding consumer adoption of Internet banking: an interpretative study in the Australian banking context. J Electron Commerce Res. 2006;7(2):50-66.
