Does Managed Care Affect Quality? Appropriateness,Referral Patterns,and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy

Abstract

This was a population-based observational study to assess the impact of managed care (MC) on several dimensions of quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) (N = 9308) in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess appropriateness and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery. Differences in patients, appropriateness, and outcomes were compared using chi-square tests; risk-adjusted outcomes were compared using regression. Fee-For-Service (FFS, N = 8691) and MC (N = 897) CEA patients had similar indications for surgery, perioperative risk, and comorbidities. There were no differences in inappropriateness between FFS and MC (8.6% vs 8.4%). MC patients were less likely to use a high-volume surgeon (20.1% vs 13.5%) or hospital (20.5% vs 13.0%, P < .05). There were no differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or stroke (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.69-1.37). Medicare MC plans did not have a positive impact on inappropriateness, referral patterns, or outcomes of CEA. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:448-456)

Keywords

managed care fee-for-service Medicare carotid endarterectomy appropriateness outcomes referral patterns volume health services overuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dudley RA , Luft HS Managed care in transition. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1087-1092.

Ellwood PM Shattuck lecture-outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med. 1988;318: 1549-1556.

Enthoven AC The history and principles of managed competition. Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12(suppl):24-48.

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.

European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.

European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis: interim results from the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Lancet.1996;347:1591-1593.

Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421-1428.

Barnett HJ , Taylor DW , Eliasziw M. , et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1415-1425.

European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379-1387.

10.

Moore WS , Barnett HJ , Beebe HG , et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee, American Heart Association . Stroke. 1995;26:188-201.

11.

Biller J. , Feinberg WM , Castaldo JE , et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1998;29:554-562.

12.

Halm EA , Tuhrim S. , Wang JJ , Rojas M. , Hannan EL , Chassin MR Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials. Neurology. 2007;68:187-194.

13.

Committee on Cerebrovascular Diseases. Classification of Cerebrovascular Diseases III. Stroke. 1990;21:637-676.

14.

Lee TH , Marcantonio ER , Mangione CM , et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation . 1999;100:1043-1049.

15.

Halm EA , Chassin MR , Tuhrim S. , et al. Revisiting the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2003;34: 1464-1471.

16.

Merrick NJ , Fink A. , Park RE , et al. Derivation of clinical indications for carotid endarterectomy by an expert panel. Am J Public Health. 1987 ;77:187-190.

17.

Winslow CM , Solomon DH , Chassin MR , Kosecoff J. , Merrick NJ , Brook RH The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med . 1988;318:721-727.

18.

Shekelle PG , Chassin MR , Park RE Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14:707-727.

19.

Chaturvedi S. , Bruno A. , Feasby T. , et al. Carotid endarterectomy-an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;65:794-801.

20.

Halliday A. , Mansfield A. , Marro J. , et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1491-1502.

21.

Halm EA , Hannan EL , Rojas M. , et al. Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy . J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:420-428.

22.

Merrick NJ , Brook RH , Fink A. , Solomon DH Use of carotid endarterectomy in five California Veterans Administration medical centers. JAMA. 1986;256:2531-2535.

23.

Birkmeyer JD , Dimick JB Leapfrog Safety Standards: Potential Benefits of Universal Adoption. Washington, DC: The Leapfrog Group; 2004.

24.

Dudley RA , Johansen KL , Brand R. , Rennie DJ , Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283:1159-1166.

25.

Halm EA , Lee C. , Chassin MR Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:511-520.

26.

Miller RH , Luft HS HMO plan performance update: an analysis of the literature, 1997-2001. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:63-86.

27.

Guadagnoli E. , Landrum MB , Peterson EA , Gahart MT , Ryan TJ , McNeil BJ Appropriateness of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction among Medicare beneficiaries. Managed care versus fee for service. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1460-1466.

28.

Schneider EC , Zaslavsky AM , Epstein AM Use of high-cost operative procedures by Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in for-profit and not-for-profit health plans. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:143-150.

29.

Erickson LC , Torchiana DF , Schneider EC , Newburger JW , Hannan EL The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery. JAMA . 2000;283:1976-1982.

30.

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicare fact sheets. Available at: http://www.kff.org/medicare/factsheets.cfm. Accessed September 18, 2006.

31.

New York State Department of Health. Carotid Endarterectomy in New York State: 1995 1997. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health; 2000.

32.

National Center for Health Statistics. Detailed Diagnoses and Procedures , National Hospital Discharge Survey. Vital and Health Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1998.

33.

Shekelle PG , Kahan JP , Bernstein SJ , Leape LL , Kamberg CJ , Park RE The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med . 1998;338:1888-1895.

34.

Ayanian JZ , Landrum MB , Normand SL , Guadagnoli E. , McNeil BJ Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography-do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med . 1998;338:1896-1904.

35.

Hemingway H. , Crook AM , Feder G. , et al. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization . N Engl J Med. 2001;344:645-654.

36.