The primary objective of this study was to examine trends in rates and outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery across the 3 Canadian provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, and Nova Scotia, during fiscal years 1991-1995. Annual age-standardized CABG surgery rates were calculated by sex for each province. Province-specific average length of stay (ALOS) and postsurgical complication rates were calculated using ICD-9 codes. Rates of CABG were higher among men compared with women in all 3 provinces. Whereas ALOS, complication rates, and mortality rates decreased in all provinces over the study period, there was considerable variation in province-specific rates.
Saunders LD, Bay K, Alibhai A. Regionalization and Hospital Utilization: Alberta 1991/1992 to 1996/1997. Report 98-0001. April 1998.
2.
Roos NP, Brownell M, Shapiro E, et al.Good news about difficult decisions. The Canadian approach to hospital cost control. Health Affairs (Millwood). 1998;17(5):239-246.
3.
Montague T, Montague P, Dzavik V, et al.For the clinical quality improvement network (CQIN) investigators. The promise and practice of cardiovascular risk reduction: a disease management perspective. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12(10):995-999.
4.
Health Care Financing Special Report: Rehospitalization by Geographic Area for Aged Medicare Beneficiaries: Selected Procedures, 1986-1987. Vol. 3. US Department of Health and Human Services. June 1990;1(17):379-419.
5.
Peters S, Chagani K, Paddon P, et al.Coronary artery bypass surgery in Canada. Health Rep. 1990;2(1):9-26.
6.
Ugnat A, Naylor D. Trends in coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1989. Can Med Assoc J1993;148(4): 569-575.
7.
Health Status of Canadians: Report of the 1991 General Social Survey. Statistics Canada. 1994. Catalog 11-612E. No. 8.
8.
Tully P, Saint-Pierre E. Downsizing Canada's hospitals, 1986/87 to 1994/95. Health Rep. 1997;8(4):33-39.
9.
US Department of Health and Human Services. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. Washington DC: Public Health Services; 1988.
10.
Ghalli WA, Hall RE, Ash AS, et al.Evaluation of complication rates after coronary artery bypass surgery using administrative data. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:192-200.
11.
Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Daley J, et al.Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias: does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?JAMA. April 22/29, 1992; 267(16):2199-2203.
12.
Assaf AR, Lapane KL, McKenney JL, et al.Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease. NEJM. Sept. 23, 1993; 329(13):931-935.
13.
Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: national and provincial mortality trends, 1992-1995. Can Med Assoc J. 1998;159(1):25-31.
14.
Cox JL, Petrie JF, Pollak PT, et al.Managed delay for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the experience at one Canadian center. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 1996;27(6):1365-1373.
15.
Naylor CD, Levinton CM. Sex-related differences in coronary revascularization practices: the perspective from a Canadian queue management project. Can Med Assoc J1993;149(7):965-973.
16.
Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, et al.Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. NEJM. 1991;325(4): 226-230.
17.
Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. NEJM. 1991;325(4):221-225.
18.
Technological Change in Health Care (TECH) research network investigators. Technological change around the world: evidence from heart attack care. Health Affairs. May/June 2001:25-42.
19.
Tu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD, et al.Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. NEJM. 1997;336:1500-1505.
20.
Cowper PA, Delong ER, Peterson ED, et al.For the IHD port investigators. Geographic variation in resource use for coronary artery bypass surgery. Med Care. 1997;35:320-333.
21.
Lahey SJ, Campos CT, Jennings B, et al.Hospital re-admission after cardiac surgery: does "fast track" cardiac surgery result in cost saving or cost shifting?Circulation. 1998;98:II-35-II-40.
22.
Tu JV, Austin PC, Walld R, et al.Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction prediction rules. J Am Coll Cardiol. March 14, 2001;37(4):992-997.
23.
Norris CM, Ghali WA, Knudtson ML, et al.Dealing with missing data in observational health care outcome analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(4):377-383.
24.
Ghali WA, Knudtson ML on behalf of the APPROACH Investigators. Overview of the Alberta provincial project for outcome assessment in coronary heart disease. Can J Cardiol. October 2000;16(10):1225-1230.
25.
Calif RM, Harrell FE, Lee KL, et al.The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease: a 15-year perspective. JAMA. 1989;261:2077-2086.
