Attendance at Major League Baseball games has long been thought to be a function of the uncertainty of a game's outcome. Optimal uncertainty and, in turn, maximal attendance are said to occur when there is a 60% chance that the home team will win. This study reexamined the data used by past researchers and found that the betting odds associated with a 60% probability of winning (7-8) are more consistent with outcome certainty than with the accepted conclusion of outcome uncertainty. One explanation for the counterintuitive finding may be that it simply costs too much to attend a MLB game today to take the chance of witnessing a losing effort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorlandJ. (1987, September). “The demand for Australian Rules Football.” The Economic Record, pp. 220–230.
2.
JennettN. (1984, June). “Attendance, uncertainty of outcomes and policy in Scottish League Football.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, pp. 176–198.
3.
KnowlesG., SheronyK., & HaupertM (1992, Fall). “The demand for Major League Baseball: A test of the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis.” The American Economist, pp. 72–80.
4.
MawsonL.M., & CoanE.E. (1994, March). “Marketing techniques used by NBA franchises to promote home game attendance.” Sport Marketing Quarterly, 1, pp. 37–44.
5.
PeelD., & ThomasD. (1988, August). “Outcomeuncertainty and the demand for football.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, pp. 242–249.
6.
QuirkJ., & El HodiriM. (1974). “The economic theory of a professional sports league.” In NollR.G. (Ed.), Government and the sports business (pp. 33–80). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
