This study presents a mixed-method approach for segmenting a sports product-market using participation motivation data. Qualitative data are used to segment a national sports product-market—running footwear—using qualitative analysis software as well as multivariate statistical approaches. This study describes a systematic approach to developing a consumer segmentation typology using both demographic variables as well as self-expressed motivations for sport and fitness participation. The mixed-method approach reported here employs qualitative data to help validate subsequent quantitative cluster analysis, and draws upon cluster profiles to establish the structure for market segmentation. The findings from this study offer implications for marketing research and marketing communications in the sport industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrooksC. (1994). Sports marketing: Competitive business strategies for sports. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
FunkD. C., MahoneyD. F., & HavitzM. E. (2003). Sport consumer behavior: Assessment and direction. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 200–205.
4.
FunkD. C., & JamesJ. (2001). The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual's psychological connection to sport. Sport Management Review, 4, 119–150.
5.
GladdenJ., & FunkD. (2002). Developing an understanding of brand association in team sport: Empirical evidence from consumers of pro sport. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 54–81.
6.
Green-DemersI., PelletierL. G., StewartD. G., & GushueN. R. (1998). Coping with the less interesting aspects of training: toward a model of interest and motivation enhancement in individual sports. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 251–261.
7.
HairJ. F.Jr., AndersonR. E., TathamR. L., & BlackW. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Third edition.
8.
HongJ. W., & ZinkhanG. M. (1995). Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode. Psychology & Marketing, 12, 53–77.
9.
JamesD. J., & RossS. D. (2004). Comparing sport consumer motivations across multiple sports. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 13(1), 17–25.
10.
KassarjianH. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8–18.
11.
KolbeR. H., & BurnettM. S. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 243–250.
12.
LachowetzT., McDonaldM. A., SuttonW. A., & HedrickD. G. (2003). Corporate sales activities and the retention of sponsors in the National Basketball Association (NBA). Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 18–26.
13.
LindquistJ. D., & SirgyM. J. (2003). Shopper, buyer, and consumer behavior. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing, Second edition.
14.
MasonD., & SlackT. (2003). Understanding principal-agent relationships: Evidence from professional hockey. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 37–61.
15.
McDonaldM. A., MilneG. R., & HongJ. (2002). Motivational factors for evaluating sport spectator and participant markets. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11, 100–113.
16.
MehtaA., (1999). Using self-concept to assess advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 81–89.
17.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
MilneG. R., & McDonaldM. A. (1999). Sport marketing: Managing the exchange process. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
19.
PerreaultW. D.Jr., & LeighL. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135–148.
20.
QSR NVivo (1999). Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, April.
21.
RossmanG. B., & WilsonB. L. (1984). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643.
22.
ShankM. (2002). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
23.
SilkM., & AmisJ. (2000). Institutional pressures and the production of sport. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 267–292.
24.
StewartB., SmithA. C. T., & NicholsonM. (2003). Sport consumer typologies: A critical review. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 206–216.
25.
TeddlieC., & TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In TashakkoriA. & TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
TrailG. T., FinkJ. S., & AndersonD. F. (2003). Sport spectator consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(1), 8–17.
27.
TrailG. T., & JamesJ. D. (2001). The motivation scale for sport consumption: A comparison of psychometric properties with other sport motivation scales. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(1), 108–127.
28.
WeissingerE., & BandalosD. L. (1995). Development, reliability, and validity of a scale to measure intrinsic motivation in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(4), 379–400.
