This study investigates how an Ivy League school's football season ticket holders demonstrate their attachment and allegiance to the intercollegiate athletic product through the application of stakeholder theory as a marketing-based construct. This paper merges the tenets of stakeholder theory and the theoretical constructs of attachment and allegiance initially investigated in Covell (2004) to understand the interests and values of these stakeholders, how they demonstrate attachment and allegiance to the sport property, and how they perceive the importance of winning in relation to their proclivities toward charitable donations to the school's athletic funds. Despite numerous assessments, the true impact of athletics on donations across all of intercollegiate athletics remains at best unclear. However, the findings indicate that from an assessment of self-reported athletic giving histories, the stakeholders studied here demonstrated attachment and allegiance to the property by not altering athletic fund donations based on the team's on-field performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A short history of the Ivy League. (1999). The Ivy League directory and record book. Princeton, NJ: Council of Ivy Group Presidents.
2.
AshforthB. E., & MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
3.
BernsteinM. F. (2001). Football: The Ivy League origins of an American obsession. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
BokD. (1985). Intercollegiate athletics. In BennettJ. B. & PeltasonJ. W. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in higher education (123-146). New York: Macmillan.
5.
BorlandM. V., GoffB. L., & PulsinelliR. W. (1992). College athletics: Financial burden or boon?Advances in the Economics of Sport, 1, 215–235.
6.
BowenW. G., & LevinS. A. (2003). Reclaiming the game: College sports and educational values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BrennerS. N., & CochranP. L. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and social theory and research. In McMahonJ. F. (Ed.), International Association for Business and Society - 1991 Proceedings, 449–467.
8.
BrookerG., & KlastorinT. D. (1981). To the victors belong the spoils? College athletics and alumni giving. Social Science Quarterly, 62(4), 744–750.
9.
ClarksonM. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.
10.
CovellD. (2004, Winter). Attachment, allegiance and a convergent application of stakeholder theory to Ivy League athletics. International Sports Journal, 8(1), 14–26.
11.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
12.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
FrederickR. E. (1984). Intercollegiate football success and institutional private support: A national study of 81 public universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Kansas.
14.
FreyJ. H. (1982). Boosterism, scarce resources, and institutional control: The future of American intercollegiate athletics. International Review of Sport Sociology, 17(2), 53–70.
15.
FunkD., GladdenJ., HowardD., JamesJ., KahleL., MadrigalR., MahonyD., NakazawaM., & TrailG. (1999, June). Understanding the sport spectator and sport fan: The three A's to allegiance. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the North American Society for Sport Management, Vancouver BC, Canada.
16.
GaskiJ. F., & EtzelM. J. (1984). Collegiate athletic success and alumni generosity: Dispelling the myth. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 29–38.
17.
GoffB. (2000, April). Effects of university athletics on the university: A review and extension of empirical evidence. Journal of Sport Management, 14(2), 85–104
18.
GrimesP. W., & ChressanthisG. A. (1994, January). Alumni contributions to academics: The role of intercollegiate sports and NCAA sanctions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53(1), 27–40.
19.
JonesT. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 404–437.
20.
JonesT. M., & WickesA. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.
21.
KahleL. R. (Ed.). (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger.
22.
MahonyD. F., GladdenJ. M., & FunkD. C. (2003, Winter). Examining athletic donors at NCAA Division I institutions. International Sports Journal, 1–27.
23.
McCormickR. E., & TinsleyM. (1990). Athletics and academics: A model of university contributions. In GoffB. L. & TollisonR. D. (Eds.), Sportometrics (193-204). College Station, TX: Texas A&University M. Press.
24.
McKennaR. (1991). Relationship marketing: Successful strategies for the age of the consumer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
MitchellR. K., AngleB. R., & WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
26.
MorrisW. (1992). The courting of Marcus Dupree (Rev. ed.). Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press.
27.
MullinB. J., HardyS., & SuttonW. A. (2000). Sport marketing (2nd Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
28.
NakazawaM., HirakawaS., NakatsukaY., SugiyamaS., SugitaF., TakahashiH., EnokiR., & TogariJ. (1998). Survey on League J. spectators. Ibaraki, Japan: University of Tsukuba, Institute of health and Sport Sciences.
29.
PutlerD. S., & WolfeR. A. (1999). Perceptions of intercollegiate athletic programs: Priorities and tradeoffs. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 301–325.
30.
QuartermanJ. (1994). Managerial role profiles of intercollegiate athletic conference commissioners. Journal of Sport Management, 8, 129–139.
31.
SackA. L., & StaurowskyE. J. (1998). College athletes for hire: The evolution and legacy of the NCAA's amateur myth. Westport, CT: Praeger.
32.
SackA. L., & WatkinsC. (1985). Winning and giving. In ChuD., SegraveJ. O., & BeckerB. J. (Eds.), Sport and higher education (pp. 299–306). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33.
ShaniD. (1997). A framework for implementing relationship marketing in the sport industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(2), 9–15.
34.
SigelmanL., & BookheimerS. (1983, June). Is it whether you win or lose? Monetary contributions to big-time college athletic programs. Social Science Quarterly, 64(2), 347–359.
35.
SigelmanL., & CarterR. (1979, September). Win one for the giver? Alumni giving and big-time college sports. Social Science Quarterly, 60(2), 284–294.
36.
SmithR. A. (1988). Sports and freedom: The rise of big-time college athletics. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
SperberM. (1998). Onward to victory: The crises that shaped college sports. New York: Henry Holt.
38.
SuttonW. A., McDonaldM. A., MilneG. R., & CipermanJ. (1997). Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15–22.
39.
ThelinJ. R. (1996). Games colleges play: Scandal and reform in intercollegiate athletics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
Timeline: Council of Ivy Group presidents. (1998). The Ivy League directory and record book. Princeton, NJ: Council of Ivy Group Presidents.
41.
TomaJ. D. (2003). Football U.: Spectator sports in the life of an American University. Ann Arbor; MI: University of Michigan Press.
42.
TrailG. T., AndersonD. F., & FinkJ. S. (2000). A theoretical model of sport spectator consumption behavior. International Journal of Sport Management, 1, 54–180
43.
TurnerS. E., MeserveL. A., & BowenW. G. (2001, December). Winning and giving: Football results and alumni giving at selective private colleges and universities. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 812–826.
44.
VelezK. (1997). The New England Small College Athletic Conference, 1971-1997: A retrospective. Unpublished manuscript. Williams College.
45.
WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14(2), 103–117.
46.
WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 1–17.
47.
ZhangJ. J., PeaseD. G., LamE. T. C., BelleriveL. M., PhamU. L., WilliamsonD. P., LeeJ. T., & WallK. (2001). Sociomotivational factors affecting spectator attendance at minor league hockey games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 10(1), 43–56.
