Most research on the link between masculinity-related constructs and psychology well-being has been conducted using correlational rather than experimental research designs. To address this limitation, this study tested the effects of activating men’s subjective masculinity experiences on state self-esteem by randomly assigning 183 men into either a masculinity priming condition or a control priming condition. Consistent with the social identity paradigm, participants who received masculinity priming reported higher state self-esteem than those in the control priming condition. A moderation effect showed that masculinity priming exerted the strongest effect on self-esteem among men with relatively negative self-perceptions. These findings are discussed within the context of the need for more experimental research on masculinity-related constructs.
AddisM. E.MansfieldA. K.SyzdekM. R. (2010). Is “masculinity” a problem? Framing the effects of gendered social learning in men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 77-90.
2.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
3.
ChiouW. B.WuW. H.LeeK. T. (2012). The achievement of masculinity through energy-drink consumption: Experimental evidence supporting a closer look at the popularity of energy drinks among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 444-451.
4.
CialdiniR. B.BordenR. J.ThorneA.WalkerM. R.FreemanS.SloandL. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
5.
HammerJ. H.GoodG. (2010). Positive psychology: An empirical examination of beneficial aspects of endorsement of masculine norms. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 303-318.
6.
HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
7.
HoggM. A.TurnerJ. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
8.
HornseyM. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222.
9.
JohnsonW.McCoyN. (2000). Self-confidence, self-esteem, and assumption of sex role in young men and women. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 90, 751-756.
10.
KanagawaC.CrossS. E.MarkusH. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90-103.
11.
KuhnM. H.McPartlandT. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.
12.
LevantR. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. The American Psychologist, 66, 765-776.
13.
LevantR. F.AllenP. A.LeinM.-C. (2014). Alexithymia in men: How and when does the deficit in the processing of emotions occur?Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15, 324-334 .
14.
LiuW. M. (2005). The study of men and masculinity as an important multicultural competency consideration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 685-697.
15.
MastM.SieverdingM.EsslenM.GraberK.JänckeL. (2008). Masculinity causes speeding in young men. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 840-842.
16.
O’NeilJ. M. (2012). The psychology of men: Theory, research, clinical knowledge, and future directions. In AltmaierE.HansenJ. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 375-408). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
OrtnerT. M.SieverdingM. (2008). Where are the gender differences? Male priming boosts spatial skills in women. Sex Roles, 59, 274-281.
18.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
19.
TurnerJ.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A social categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 101-113.
21.
WhorleyM. R.AddisM. E. (2006). Ten years of psychological research on men and masculinity in the United States: Dominant methodological trends. Sex Roles, 55, 649-658.
22.
WongY. J.SheaM.HickmanS. J.LaFolletteJ. R.CruzN.BoghokianT. (2013). The Subjective Masculinity Stress Scale: Scale development and psychometric properties. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 148-155.
23.
WongY. J.SheaM.LaFolletteJ. R.HickmanS. J.CruzN.BoghokianT. (2011). The Inventory of Subjective Masculinity Experiences: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19, 236-255.
24.
WongY. J.SteinfeldtJ. A.LaFolletteJ. R.TsaoS. C. (2011). Men’s tears: Football players’ evaluations of crying behavior. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 297-310.
25.
WongY. J.SteinfeldtJ. A.SpeightQ. L.HickmanS. J. (2010). Content analysis of the Psychology of Men and Masculinity (2000–2008). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 170-181.
