Abstract
A 12-day peer-review audit was performed in the outpatient pharmacy of a large teaching hospital. The audit process was not masked, that is, the pharmacists were aware of the peer-review evaluation. During the 12-day period, 9394 prescription forms and their corresponding pharmaceutical products were examined manually before being delivered to the patient. A total of 1165 (12.4 percent) dispensing errors were detected, with 141 (1.5 percent) of these considered potentially serious. Seventy-six prescriptions contained two errors and four prescriptions contained three. A linear relationship (r2 = 0.78; P < 0.001) existed between the number of potentially serious errors and the total number of prescriptions filled. There were no statistically significant differences in the dispensing-error rate for the eight pharmacists audited. There was a trend for the number of pharmacist-hours containing at least one potentially serious dispensing error to increase as the prescription-filling rate accelerated.
Outpatient pharmacies with high volumes should set a limit to the number of prescriptions filled by their pharmacists and should experiment with quality assurance systems to reduce dispensing errors and subsequent legal liabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.