A detailed review is offered of the claims that are put forward for the use of penicillin-sulfonamides, penicillin-streptomycin, and certain other fixed combinations of antimicrobial agents. The judgments presented are based upon an extensive review of the literature, and a roster of pertinent references is appended.
It is the opinion of the five panels that the penicillin-sulfonamide and penicillin-streptomycin combinations are “ineffective as fixed dose combinations.” This means that, although the individual active ingredients may be useful in specific disease entities, no greater effectiveness can be expected for the combination than for any one ingredient. The report also considers the adverse effect of such fixed combinations on the practice of medicine. It is the judgment of the five panels on anti-infective drugs that the use of these fixed combinations should be discontinued and that the physician should use the individual components according to his best clinical judgment and laboratory information.
WeinsteinL.Antibiotics; I. General considerations, pp. 1171–1192. In GoodmanL. S., and GilmanA., Eds. (3rd ed.) New York: The Macmillan Co., 1965. Weinstein, L. Chemotherapy of microbial diseases; sulfonamides, pp. 1144–1170. In L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, Eds. (3rd ed.) New York: The Macmillan Co., 1965. Weinstein, L. II. Penicillin, pp. 1193–1229. In L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, Eds. (3rd ed.) New York: The Macmillan Co., 1965.
2.
WeinsteinL., SametC. A., and ChewW. H.Studies of the effects of penicillin-sulfonamide combinations in man. Am. J. Med. Sci.248: 408–414, 1964.
3.
WeinsteinL., MadoffM. A., and SametC. M.The sulfonamides. New Engl. J. Med.263: 952–957, 1960.
4.
JawetzE., and GunnisonJ. B.Antibiotic synergism and antagonism: an assessment of the problem. Pharmacol. Rev.5: 175–192, 1953.
5.
SellS. H. W.In vitro sensitivity studies of Hemophilus influenzae—typable and nontypable strains. Pediatrics39: 214–219, 1967.
6.
RubensteinM. M., McBeanJ. B., HedgecockL. D., and SticklerG. B.The treatment of acute otitis media in children; II. a third clinical trial. Am. J. Diseases Children109: 308–313, 1965.
7.
FinlandM.The new antibiotic era: for better or for worse?Antibiot. Med. Clin. Therap.4: 17–20, 1957. (editorial)
8.
Antibiotic antagonism. J. Am. Med. Assoc.147: 513–514, 1951. (editorial)
9.
Antibiotic combinations. New Engl. J. Med.245: 989, 1951. (editorial)
10.
DowlingH. F.Present status of therapy with combinations of antibiotics. Am. J. Med.39: 796–811, 1965.
11.
GeraciJ. E.Further experiences with short-term (2 weeks), combined penicillin-streptomycin therapy for bacterial endocarditis caused by penicillin-sensitive streptococci. Proc. Mayo Clin.30: 192–200, 1955.
12.
GeraciJ. E., and MartinW. J.Antibiotic therapy of bacterial endocarditis; IV. Successful short-term (two weeks) combined penicillin-dihydrostreptomycin therapy in subacute bacterial endocarditis caused by penicillin-sensitive streptococci. Circulation8: 494–509, 1953.
13.
HallF., DowlingH. F., and KellowW.Successful short-term therapy of streptococcal endocarditis with penicillin and streptomycin. Am. J. Med. Sci.230: 73–81, 1955.
14.
HunterT. H.The treatment of some bacterial infections of the heart and pericardium. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med.28: 213–228, 1952.
15.
LernerP. I., and WeinsteinL.Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. New Engl. J. Med.274: 199–206; 259–266; 323–331; 388–393; 1966.
16.
RantzL. A., and KirbyW. M. M.Enterococcic infections; an evaluation of the importance of fecal streptococci and related organisms in the causation of human disease. Arch. Internal Med. (Chicago)71: 516–528, 1943.
17.
TompsettR., RobbinsW. C., and BerntsenC.Jr.Short-term penicillin and dihydrostreptomycin therapy of streptococcal endocarditis; results of the treatment of thirty-five patients. Am. J. Med.24: 57–67, 1958.
18.
FiferW. R., HusebyeK., ChedisterC., and MillerM.Primary lung abscess; analysis of therapy and results in 55 cases. Arch. Internal Med. (Chicago)107: 668–680, 1961.
19.
FoxJ. R., HughesF. A.Jr., and SutliffW. D.Nonspecific lung abscess: experience with fifty-five consecutive cases. J. Thorac. Surg.27: 255–260, 1954.
20.
SchweppeJ. I., KnowlesJ. H., and KaneL.Lung abscess; an analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital cases from 1943 through 1956. New Engl. J. Med.265: 1039–1043, 1961.
21.
BlissE. A., WarthP. R., and LongP. H.Studies of combinations of antibiotics in vitro and in experimental infections in mice. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.90: 149–169, 1952.
22.
CameronJ. L., AndersonR. P., and ZuidemaG. D.Aspiration pneumonia; a clinical and experimental review. J. Surg. Res.7: 44–53, 1967.
23.
LouriaD. B., and KaminskiR.The effects of four antimicrobial drug regimens on sputum superinfection in hospitalized patients. Am. Rev. Resp. Diseases85: 649–665, 1962.
24.
ShulmanJ. A., PhillipsL. A., and PetersdorfR. G.Errors and hazards in the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial pneumonias. Ann. Internal Med.62: 41–58, 1965.
25.
AdamsR.Acute suppurative mediastinitis. J. Thorac. Surg.15: 336–340, 1946.
26.
KeeferC. S.Acute and chronic mediastinitis; a study of sixty cases. Arch. Internal Med. (Chicago)62: 109–136, 1938.
27.
PulaskiE. J.Regional infections and wounds; III. The thoracic cavity; infections of the chest, pp. 247–249. In Surgical Infections.Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1954.
28.
ArtzC. P., BarnettW. O., and GroganJ. B.Further studies concerning the pathogenesis and treatment of peritonitis. Ann. Surg.155: 756–767, 1962.
29.
BabcockJ. R., and McKinleyW. N.Acute appendicitis; an analysis of 1,662 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg.150: 131–141, 1959.
30.
BarnesB. A., BehringerG. E., WheelockF. C., and WilkinsE. W.Surgical sepsis: analysis of factors associated with sepsis following appendectomy (1937–1959). Ann. Surg.156: 703–712, 1962.
31.
HardyJ. D.Treatment of specific infections in the surgical patient. I. The treatment of generalized peritonitis. Arch. Surg. (Chicago)83: 787–788, 1961.
32.
PulaskiE. J., NoyesH. E., EvansJ. R., and BrameR. A.Influence of antibiotics on experimental endogenous peritonitis. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.99: 341–358, 1954.
33.
ZintelH. A.Streptomycin in peritonitis. Am. J. Med.2: 443–448, 1947.
34.
ZintelH. A., ZinsserH. H., RunyonW., JacksonG. L., NicholsA. C., WileyM. M., and WilliamsW. J.Influence of antibiotics and sulfonamides on the mortality and bacteria of experimental peritonitis. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.91: 742–751, 1950.
35.
LindbergR. B., WetzlerR. F., MarshallJ. D., NewtonA., StrawitzJ. G., and HowardJ. M.The bacterial flora of battle wounds at the time of primary debridement; a study of the Korean battle casualty. Ann. Surg.141: 369–374, 1955.
36.
Ad Hoc Committee of the Committee on Trauma, Division of Medical Sciences, NAS-NRC.Postoperative wound infections: the influence of ultra-violet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann. Surg.160 (Suppl): 73–78, 1964.
37.
BarnesJ., PaceW. G., TrumpD. S., and EllisonE. H.Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics; a controlled study of 1,007 cases. Arch. Surg. (Chicago)79: 190–196, 1959.
38.
JohnstoneF. R. C.An assessment of prophylactic anti-biotics in general surgery. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.116: 1–10, 1963.
39.
McKittrickL. S., and WheelockF. C.Jr.The routine use of antibiotics in elective abdominal surgery. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.99: 376–377, 1954.
40.
Sanchez-UbedaR., FernandE., and RousselotL. M.Complication rate in general surgical cases; the value of penicillin and streptomycin as postoperative prophylaxis—a study of 511 cases. New Engl. J. Med.259: 1045–1050, 1958.
41.
AshamallaG., WaltersR., and CrahanM.Recent clinicolaboratory observations in the treatment of acute gonococcal urethritis in men. J. Am. Med. Assoc.195: 1115–1119, 1966.
42.
BorringJ.Sensitivity of gonococci to antibiotics related to results of treatment. Brit. J. Vener. Disease41: 193–198, 1965.
43.
ReynA., KornerB., and BentzonM. W.Effects of penicillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline on N. gonorrhoeae isolated in 1944 and in 1957. Brit. J. Vener. Disease34: 227–239, 1958.
44.
ThayerJ. D., and MooreM. B.Jr.Gonorrhea: present knowledge, research and control efforts. Med. Clin. N. Amer.48: 755–765, 1964.
45.
ThayerJ. D., DeaconW. E., SchroeterA. L., MooreM. B., and WilcoxR. R.Round table on chemotherapy of venereal diseases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.5: 1115–1119, 1965.
KleemanC. R., HewittW. L., and GuzeL. B.Pyelonephritis. Medicine (Balt)39: 3–116, 1960.
48.
StameyR. A., GovanD. E., and PalmerJ. M.The localization and treatment of urinary tract infections: the role of bactericidal urine levels as opposed to serum levels. Medicine (Balt)44: 1–36, 1965.
49.
DowlingH. F., LepperM. H., and JacksonG. G.Commentary; suppressive therapy of chronic bronchial infections. Clin. Pharmacol. Therap.3: 564–579, 1962.
50.
FletcherC. M., and OldhamP. D.Value of chemoprophylaxis and chemotherapy in early chronic bronchitis; a report to the Medical Research Council by their Working Party on Trials of Chemotherapy in Early Chronic Bronchitis. Brit. Med J.1: 1317–1322, 1966.
51.
HeinemanH. S., and BraudeA. I.Anaerobic infection of the brain; observations on eighteen consecutive cases of brain abscess. Am. J. Med.35: 682–697, 1963.
52.
SperlM. P.Jr., MacCartyC. S., and WellmanW. E.Observations on current therapy of abscess of the brain. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.81: 439–441, 1959.
