Any odor cue can be traced to find its release source. So-called “source localization” has been observed in animals in many important tasks including finding food or mates. In particular, the scientific community for a long time focused on unraveling the complex behavior of moths while in pursuit of sex pheromones emitted by their distant female counterpart. These studies have provided many insights including details of the flight paths, sensory organs, and pheromone processing. In turn, this knowledge has provided inspiration to engineers and researchers to devise source-seeking algorithms, whereas sensory organs/-mechanisms led to insect-machine hybrid systems. Therefore, this review revolves around these last two approaches specifically (1) the implementation of moth-inspired algorithms in robotic platforms and the (2) use of biosensors such as antennae or insect-machine hybrid systems.
AndersonM. J.SullivanJ. G.HoriuchiT. K.FullerS. B.DanielT. L. (2020). A bio-hybrid odor-guided autonomous palm-sized air vehicle. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 16(2), 26002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/abbd81
2.
AndersonM. J.SullivanJ. G.TalleyJ. L.BrinkK. M.FullerS. B.DanielT. L. (2019). The “Smellicopter,” a bio-hybrid odor localizing nano air vehicle. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968589
3.
AndoN.EmotoS.KanzakiR. (2013). Odour-tracking capability of a silkmoth driving a mobile robot with turning bias and time delay. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 8(1), 16008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/016008
4.
AndoN.EmotoS.KanzakiR. (2016). Insect-controlled robot: A mobile robot platform to evaluate the odor-tracking capability of an insect. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (118), 54802. https://doi.org/10.3791/54802
5.
AndoN.KanzakiR. (2015). A simple behaviour provides accuracy and flexibility in odour plume tracking–the robotic control of sensory-motor coupling in silkmoths. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218(23), 3845–3854. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.124834
6.
AndoN.KanzakiR. (2017). Using insects to drive mobile robots—hybrid robots bridge the gap between biological and artificial systems. Arthropod Structure and Development, 46(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2017.02.003
AtemaJ.HollandK.IkeharaW. (1980). Olfactory responses of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) to prey odors: Chemical search image. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 6(1), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402922
9.
BauJ.CardéR. T. (2015). Modeling optimal strategies for finding a resource-linked, windborne odor plume: Theories, robotics, and biomimetic lessons from flying insects. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 55(3), icv036. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icv036
10.
BayatB.CrastaN.CrespiA.PascoalA. M.IjspeertA. (2017). Environmental monitoring using autonomous vehicles: A survey of recent searching techniques. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 45(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.01.009
BelangerJ. H.ArbasE. A. (1998). Behavioral strategies underlying pheromone-modulated flight in moths: Lessons from simulation studies. Journal of Comparative Physiology A Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology, 183(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050261
13.
BelangerJ. H.WillisM. A. (1996). Adaptive control of odor-guided locomotion: Behavioral flexibility as an antidote to environmental unpredictability. Adaptive Behavior, 4(3–4), 217–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/105971239600400302
14.
BergH. C. (1993). Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press.
ButenandtV. A. (1959). Uber den sexsual-lockstoff des seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung Und Konstitution.
17.
CardéR. T.Mafra-NetoA. (1997). Mechanisms of flight of male moths to pheromone Insect pheromone research. Springer.
18.
ChangD.WuW.WebsterD. R.WeissburgM. J.ZhangF. (2013). A bio-inspired plume tracking algorithm for mobile sensing swarms in turbulent flow. In Proceedings - IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 06–10 May 2013, Karlsruhe, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630683
19.
ChenX.HuangJ. (2019). Odor source localization algorithms on mobile robots: A review and future outlook. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 112(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.11.014
20.
ChewJ. Y.YoshiharaT.KurabayashiD. (2014). Embodiment sensing for self-generated zigzag turning algorithm using vision-based plume diffusion. In International conference on simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots, (pp. 498–508).
21.
DevezaR.ThielD.RussellA.Mackay-SimA. (1994). Odor sensing for robot guidance. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 13(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499401300305
22.
EdwardsS.RutkowskiA. J.QuinnR. D.WillisM. A. (2005). Moth-inspired plume tracking strategies in three-dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. (pp. 1669–1674) IEEE.
23.
EmotoS.AndoN.TakahashiH.KanzakiR. (2007). Insect-controlled robot–evaluation of adaptation ability. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 19(4), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.11.014
24.
FarrellJ. A.MurlisJ.LongX.LiW.CardéR. T. (2002). Filament-based atmospheric dispersion model to achieve short time-scale structure of odor plumes. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2(1–2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016283702837
25.
FarrellJ.PangS.LiW. (2005). Chemical Plume Tracing via an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 30(2), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2004.838066
26.
FarrellJ. A.PangS.LiW.ArrietaR. (2003). Chemical plume tracing experimental results with a REMUS AUV. In OCEANS 2003 celebrating the past ... Teaming toward the future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492), 22–26 September 2003, San Diego, CA, USA, (pp. 962–968).
27.
FutrelleR. P. (1984). How molecules get to their detectors: The physics of diffusion of insect pheromones. Trends in Neurosciences, 7(4), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80238-6
28.
GaoB.LiH.LiW.SunF. (2016a). 3D Moth-inspired chemical plume tracking and adaptive step control strategy. Adaptive Behavior, 24(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712315623998
29.
GaoB.LiH.SunF. (2016b). 3D moth-inspired chemical plume tracking. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), (pp. 1786–1791). IEEE.
30.
GenoveseV.DarioP.MagniR.OdettiL. (1992). Self-organizing behavior and swarm intelligence in a pack of mobile miniature robots in search of pollutants. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IEEE. (pp. 1575–1582).
31.
GolovY.BenelliN.GurkaR.HarariA.ZilmanG.LiberzonA. (2021). Open-source computational simulation of moth-inspired navigation algorithm: A benchmark framework. MethodsX, 8(1), 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101529
32.
HadadT.HarariA.LiberzonA.GurkaR. (2013). On the correlation of moth flight to characteristics of a turbulent plume. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1310.1411.
33.
HoribeJ.AndoN.KanzakiR. (2019). Insect behavior as high-sensitive olfactory sensor for robotic odor tracking. In Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems, (pp. 183–192).
34.
HoribeJ.AndoN.KanzakiR. (2021). Odor-searching robot with insect-behavior-based olfactory sensor. Sensors and Materials, 33(12), 4185–4202. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2021.3369
35.
HorineF. M.DalyK. C.SmithB. H. (2004). Explosives detection with hard-wired moths. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 53(4), 1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2004.831455
36.
HutchinsonM.OhH.ChenW. H. (2017). A review of source term estimation methods for atmospheric dispersion events using static or mobile sensors. Information Fusion, 36(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.11.010
37.
HutchinsonM.OhH.ChenW. H. (2018). Entrotaxis as a strategy for autonomous search and source reconstruction in turbulent conditions. Information Fusion, 42(November), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.10.009
38.
IshidaH.HayashiK.TakakusakiM.NakamotoT.MoriizumiT.KanzakiR. (1996). Odour-source localization system mimicking behaviour of silkworm moth. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 51(2–3), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(95)01220-6
39.
IshidaH.SuetsuguK.NakamotoT.MoriizumiT. (1994). Study of autonomous mobile sensing system for localization of odor source using gas sensors and anemometric sensors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 45(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(94)00829-9
40.
IshidaH.WadaY.MatsukuraH. (2012). Chemical sensing in robotic applications: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 12(11), 3163–3173. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2012.2208740
41.
JingT.MengQ.-H.IshidaH. (2021). Recent progress and trend of robot odor source localization. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 16(2), 938–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.23364
KanzakiR.MinegishiR.NamikiS.AndoN. (2013). Insect-machine hybrid system for understanding and evaluating sensory-motor control by sex pheromone in Bombyx mori. Journal of Comparative Physiology: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 199(11), 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0832-8
44.
KanzakiR.NagasawaS.ShimoyamaI. (2004). Neural basis of odor-source searching behavior in insect microbrain systems evaluated with a mobile robot. In Bio-mechanisms of swimming and flying, (pp. 155–170). Springer.
45.
KanzakiR.NagasawaS.ShimoyamaI. (2005). Neural basis of odor-source searching behavior in insect brain systems evaluated with a mobile robot. Chemical Senses, 30(suppl_1), i285–i286. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh226
46.
KareivaP. M.ShigesadaN. (1983). Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia, 56(2–3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379695
KowadloG.RussellR. A. (2008). Robot odor localization: A taxonomy and survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 27(8), 869–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364908095118
50.
KuwanaY.NagasawaS.ShimoyamaI.KanzakiR. (1999). Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behaviour of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 14(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(98)00106-7
51.
KuwanaY.ShimanoyamaI.SayamaY.MiuraH. (1997). A robot that behaves like a silkworm moth in the pheromone stream. Artificial Life V: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, 5, 370.
52.
KuwanaY.ShimoyamaI. (1998). A pheromone-guided mobile robotthat behaveslike a silkworm moth with living antennae as pheromonesensors. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 17(9), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499801700902
53.
KuwanaY.ShimoyamaI.MiuraH. (1995). Steering control of a mobile robot using insect antennae. In Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. Human robot interaction and cooperative robots, 05–09 August 1995,Pittsburgh, PA, USA, (pp. 530–535). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.1995.526267
54.
KuwanaY.ShimoyamaI.SayamaY.MiuraH. (1996). Synthesis of pheromone-oriented emergent behavior of a silkworm moth. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3, 1722–1729. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.1996.569043
55.
LanB.KanzakiR.AndoN. (2019). Dropping counter: A detection algorithm for identifying odour-evoked responses from noisy electroantennograms measured by a flying robot. Sensors, 19(20), 4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204574
56.
LeathersK. W.MichaelisB. T.ReidenbachM. A. (2020). Interpreting the spatial-temporal structure of turbulent chemical plumes utilized in odor tracking by lobsters. Fluids, 5(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5020082
LetherenB.MontesG. (2016). Design and flight testing of a bio-inspired plume tracking algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE.
59.
LewisT.BhaganagarK. (2021). A comprehensive review of plume source detection using unmanned vehicles for environmental sensing. Science of the Total Environment, 762(December), 144029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144029
60.
LiW. (2006). Abstraction of odor source declaration algorithm from moth-inspired plume tracing strategies. In 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, 17–20 December 2006, Kunming, China, (pp. 1024–1029).
61.
LiW.FarrellJ. A.CardéR. T.CardR. T. (2001). Tracking of fluid-advected odor plumes: Strategies inspired by insect orientation to pheromone. Adaptive Behavior, 9(3–4), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123010093003
62.
LiZ.TianZ. F.LuT. fuWangH. (2020). Assessment of different plume-tracing algorithms for indoor plumes. Building and Environment, 173(1), 106746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106746
63.
LiberzonA.HarringtonK.DanielN.GurkaR.HarariA.ZilmanG. (2018). Moth-inspired navigation algorithm in a turbulent odor plume from a pulsating source. PloS One, 13(6), e0198422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198422
64.
LilienthalA.ReimannD.ZellA. (2003). Gas source tracing with a mobile robot using an adapted moth strategy. In Autonome Mobile Systeme (AMS), Karlsruhe, Germany, (pp. 150–160). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18986-9_16
65.
LilienthalA. J.LoutfiA.DuckettT. (2006). Airborne chemical sensing with mobile robots. Sensors, 6(11), 1616–1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6111616
66.
LochmatterT. (2010). Bio-inspired and probabilistic algorithms for distributed odor source localization using mobile robots. EPFL. https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-4628
67.
LopezL.VouloutsiV.Escuredo ChimenoA.MarcosE.i BadiaS. B.MathewsZ.ChimenoF. M. J. P.ZiyatdinovA.i LluA. P. (2011). Moth-like chemo-source localization and classification on an indoor autonomous robot. On Biomimetics. https://doi.org/10.5772/19695
68.
MacedoJ.MarquesL.CostaE. (2019). A comparative study of bio-inspired odour source localisation strategies from the state-action perspective. Sensors, 19(10), 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102231
69.
Mafra-NetoA.CardéR. T. (1994). Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths. Nature, 369(6476), 142–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/369142a0
70.
Mafra-NetoA.CardéR. T. (1996). Dissection of the pheromone-modulated flight of moths using single-pulse response as a template. Experientia, 52(1), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01919543
71.
MagalhãesH.BaptistaR.MacedoJ.MarquesL. (2020). Towards Fast plume source estimation with a mobile robot. Sensors, 20(24), 7025. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247025
72.
MajorR.JeffsA. (2017). Orientation and food search behaviour of a deep sea lobster in turbulent versus laminar odour plumes. Helgoland Marine Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-017-0489-8
73.
MartinezD.ArhidiL.DemondionE.MassonJ.-B.LucasP. (2014). Using insect electroantennogram sensors on autonomous robots for olfactory searches. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 90, e51704. https://doi.org/10.3791/51704
74.
MartinezD.MoraudE. M. (2016). Reactive and cognitive search strategies for olfactory robots. Neuromorphic Olfaction, 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14670-10
MurlisJ.JonesC. D. (1981). Fine-scale structure of odour plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources. Physiological Entomology, 6(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1981.tb00262.xCitations
77.
MyrickA. J.BakerT. C. (2011). Locating a compact odor source using a four-channel insect electroantennogram sensor. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 6(1), 016002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/6/1/016002
78.
MyrickA. J.ParkK. C.HetlingJ. R.BakerT. C. (2008). Real-time odor discrimination using a bioelectronic sensor array based on the insect electroantennogram. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 3(4), 46006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/3/4/046006
79.
NakamotoT.IshidaH.MoriizumiT. (1996). An odor compass for localizing an odor source. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 35(1–3), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(96)02009-6
80.
OjedaP.MonroyJ.Gonzalez-JimenezJ. (2020). An evaluation of gas source localization algorithms for mobile robots. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applications of Intelligent Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378184.3378220
81.
OkajimaK.ShigakiS.ReyesC. H.SanadaK.KurabayashiD. (2020). Analysis of the effect of sampling strategy: Flicking for chemical plume tracing by an autonomous robot. In 2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 12–15 January 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA, (pp. 542–545).
82.
PichonJ.-M.BlanesC.FranceschiniN. (1990). Visual guidance of a mobile robot equipped with a network of self-motion sensors. Mobile Robots IV, 1195, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.969868
83.
PykP.Bermúdez i BadiaS.BernardetU.KnüselP.CarlssonM.GuJ.ChanieE.HanssonB. S.PearceT. C.VerschureP. F. M. J. (2006). An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search. Autonomous Robots, 20(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-7101-4
84.
RahbarF.MarjoviA.KibleurP.MartinoliA. (2017). A 3-D bio-inspired odor source localization and its validation in realistic environmental conditions. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 24–28 September 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (pp. 3983–3989).
85.
RozasR.MoralesJ.VageD.VegaD. (1991). Artificial smell detection for robotic navigation (pp. 1730–1733). IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR.1991.240354
86.
RumboE. R.KaisslingK. E. (1989). Temporal resolution of odour pulses by three types of pheromone receptor cells in Antheraea polyphemus. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 165(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00619348
87.
RussellR. A. (2001). Survey of robotic applications for odor-sensing technology. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/02783640122067318
88.
RussellR. A.Bab-HadiasharA.ShepherdR. L.WallaceG. G. (2003). A comparison of reactive robot chemotaxis algorithms. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 45(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(03)00120-9
89.
RutkowskiA. J.EdwardsS.WillisM. A.QuinnR. D.CauseyG. C. (2004). A robotic platform for testing moth-inspired plume tracking strategies. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,2004. Proceedings. ICRA042004, 26 April 2004–01 May 2004, New Orleans, LA, USA, (pp. 3319–3324). https://doi.10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1308766
90.
SandiniG.LucariniG.VaroliM. (1993). Gradient driven self-organizing systems. In Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS93), 26429–30432 July 1993, Yokohama, Japan. (pp. 429–432). https://doi.10.1109/IROS.1993.583132
91.
SauerA. E.KargG.KochU. T.De KramerJ. J.MilliR. (1992). A portable EAG system for the measurement of pheromone concentrations in the field. Chemical Senses, 17(5), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/17.5.543
92.
ShigakiS.SakuraiT.AndoN.KurabayashiD.KanzakiR. (2018). Time-varying moth-inspired algorithm for chemical plume tracing in turbulent environment. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2730361
SiqiZ.DeminX.ZhangS.XuD. (2011). A survey of biologically inspired chemical plume tracking strategies for single robot in 2-D turbulence dominated flow environments. In 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 20–22 December 2011, Kyoto, (pp. 348–353). https://doi.org/10.1109/SII.2011.6147472
95.
SuttonO. G. (1947). The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 73(317–318), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707331704
96.
TerutsukiD.UchidaT.FukuiC.SukekawaY.OkamotoY.KanzakiR. (2021a). Electroantennography-based bio-hybrid odor-detecting drone using silkmoth antennae for odor source localization. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 27(174), e62895. https://doi.org/10.3791/62895
97.
TianY.LiW.ZhangA.YuJ.ZhangQ.LiY. (2015a). From simulation to validation: Moth-inspired chemical plume tracing with an autonomous underwater vehicle. In Oceans - St. John’s, 2014, St. John’s, NL. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2014.7002997
98.
TerutsukiD.UchidaT.FukuiC.SukekawaY.OkamotoY.KanzakiR. (2021b). Real-time odor concentration and direction recognition for efficient odor source localization using a small bio-hybrid drone. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, 339, 129770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129770
99.
TianY.LiW.ZhangF. (2015b). Moth-inspired plume tracing via autonomous underwaer vehcle with only a pair of separated chemical sensors. In OCEANS 15 MTS/IEEE, Washington, DC, USA. (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2015.7401897
100.
VickersN. J. (2000). Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. The Biological Bulletin, 198(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542524
101.
VickersN. J.BakerT. C. (1994). Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(13), 5756–5760. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.13.5756
102.
VogesN.ChaffiolA.LucasP.MartinezD. (2014). Reactive searching and infotaxis in odor source localization. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(10), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003861
103.
VouloutsiV.Lopez-SerranoL. L.MathewsZ.ChimenoA. E.ZiyatdinovA.Pererai i LlunaA.Bermúdez i BadiaS.VerschureP. F. M. J. (2016). The synthetic moth: A neuromorphic approach toward artificial olfaction in robots. Neuromorphic Olfaction, 117–152. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14670-9
104.
WangL.PangS. (2022). Robotic odor source localization via adaptive bio-inspired navigation using fuzzy inference methods. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 147(1), 103914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103914
105.
WillisM. A. (2005). Odor-modulated navigation in insects and artificial systems. Chemical Senses, 30(suppl_1), i287–i288. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh227
WrightR. H. (1958). The olfactory guidance of flying insects. The Canadian Entomologist, 90(02), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent9081-2
108.
YangY.FengQ.CaiH.XuJ.LiF.DengZ.YanC.LiX. (2019). Experimental study on three single-robot active olfaction algorithms for locating contaminant sources in indoor environments with no strong airflow. Building and Environment, 155(1), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.043
109.
ZhouJ.LiJ.CuiS. (2015). A bionic plume tracing method with a mobile robot in outdoor time-varying airflow environment. In 2015 International conference on information and automation, IEEE. (pp. 2351–2355).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
