Do not burn these gentle bridges: An empirical framework based on the 4E perspective is necessary,pertinent,and timely

Abstract

A recent opinion article suggested that the target article, “The holobiont mind: A bridge between 4E cognition and the microbiome”, wished to generate a “new theory of mind”. Furthermore, it contained ideas that were “unnecessary”, “not justified”, and “not innovative at all”. Furthermore the commentators consider that “the ideas of radical enactivism can properly accommodate this research”. Here, we address and clarify apprehensions, misreadings, and misunderstandings raised by the commentators.

Keywords

Microbiome holobiont brain–gut built environment 4E cognition ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2017). On (not) defining cognition. Synthese, 194(11), 4233–4249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1454-4.

Bordenstein

S. R.

Theis

K. R.

(2015). Host biology in light of the microbiome: Ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biology, 13(8), e1002226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226.

Clark

Chalmers

(1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7.

Craver

C. F.

(2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Clarendon Press.

Czeszumski

Eustergerling

Lang

Menrath

Gerstenberger

Schuberth

Schreiber

Rendon

Z. Z.

König

(2020). Hyperscanning: A valid method to study neural inter-brain underpinnings of social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039.

Djebbara

Fich

L. B.

Petrini

Gramann

(2019). Sensorimotor brain dynamics reflect architectural affordances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(29), 14769–14778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900648116.

Dumas

Nadel

Soussignan

Martinerie

Garnero

(2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE, 5(8), e12166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.

Fields

Levin

(2020). How do living systems create meaning? Philosophies, 5(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5040036.

Fujimura

K. E.

Lynch

S. V.

(2015). Microbiota in allergy and asthma and the emerging relationship with the gut microbiome. Cell Host & Microbe, 17(5), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.007.

10.

Gilbert

S. F.

Sapp

Tauber

A. I.

(2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1086/668166.

11.

Gilbert

S. F.

Tauber

A. I.

(2016). Rethinking individuality: The dialectics of the holobiont. Biology & Philosophy, 31(6), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9541-3.

12.

Gordon

Youle

Knowlton

Rohwer

Relman

D. A.

(2013). Superorganisms and holobionts. Microbe, 8(4), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.8.152.1.

13.

Gramann

Ferris

D. P.

Gwin

Makeig

(2014). Imaging natural cognition in action. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 91(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.09.003.

14.

Gramann

Hohlefeld

F. U.

Gehrke

Klug

(2021). Human cortical dynamics during full-body heading changes. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 18186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97749-8.

15.

Haahtela

Holgate

Pawankar

Akdis

C. A.

Benjaponpitak

Caraballo

Demain

Portnoy

von Hertzen

WAO Special Committee on Climate Change and Biodiversity. (2013). The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: World allergy organization position statement. The World Allergy Organization Journal, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-6-3.

16.

Horve

P. F.

Lloyd

Mhuireach

G. A.

Dietz

Fretz

MacCrone

Van Den Wymelenberg

Ishaq

S. L.

(2020). Building upon current knowledge and techniques of indoor microbiology to construct the next era of theory into microorganisms, health, and the built environment. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-019-0157-y.

17.

Hutto

D. D.

Kirchhoff

M. D.

Myin

(2014). Extensive enactivism: Why keep it all in? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00706.

18.

Ishaq

S. L.

Parada

F. J.

Wolf

P. G.

Bonilla

C. Y.

Carney

M. A.

Benezra

Wissel

Friedman

DeAngelis

K. M.

Robinson

J. M.

Fahimipour

A. K.

Manus

M. B.

Grieneisen

Dietz

L. G.

Pathak

Chauhan

Kuthyar

Stewart

J. D.

Dasari

M. R.

Morar

(2021). Introducing the microbes and social equity working group: Considering the microbial components of social, environmental, and health justice. mSystems, 6(4), e0047121. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00471-21.

19.

Johnson

A. J.

Vangay

Al-Ghalith

G. A.

Hillmann

B. M.

Ward

T. L.

Shields-Cutler

R. R.

Kim

A. D.

Shmagel

A. K.

Syed

A. N.

Walter

Menon

Koecher

Knights

(2019). Personalized microbiome class students, walterdaily sampling reveals personalized diet-microbiome associations in humans. Cell Host & Microbe, 25(6), 789–802.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.005.J.

20.

Kembel

S. W.

Jones

Kline

Northcutt

Stenson

Womack

A. M.

Bohannan

B. J.

Brown

G. Z.

Green

J. L.

(2012). Architectural design influences the diversity and structure of the built environment microbiome. The ISME Journal, 6(8), 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.211.

21.

Klimovich

A. V.

Bosch

T. C. G.

(2018). Rethinking the role of the nervous system: Lessons from the hydra holobiont. Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 40(9), e1800060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201800060.

22.

Konvalinka

Roepstorff

(2012). The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215.

23.

Krakauer

J. W.

Ghazanfar

A. A.

Gomez-Marin

MacIver

M. A.

Poeppel

(2017). Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron, 93(3), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041.

24.

Ladouce

Donaldson

D. I.

Dudchenko

P. A.

Ietswaart

(2016). Understanding minds in real-world environments: Toward a mobile cognition approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00694.

25.

Ladouce

Donaldson

D. I.

Dudchenko

P. A.

Ietswaart

(2019). Mobile EEG identifies the re-allocation of attention during real-world activity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 15851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51996-y.

26.

Lyu

Zajonc

Pagé

Tanney

C. A. S.

Shah

Monjezi

Msimbira

L. A.

Antar

Nazari

Backer

Smith

D. L.

(2021). Plant holobiont theory: The phytomicrobiome plays a central role in evolution and success. Microorganisms, 9(4), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040675.

27.

Mach

Moroldo

Rau

Lecardonnel

Le Moyec

Robert

Barrey

(2021). Understanding the holobiont: Crosstalk between gut microbiota and mitochondria during long exercise in horse. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8, 656204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.656204.

28.

Makeig

Gramann

Jung

T. P.

Sejnowski

T. J.

Poizner

(2009). Linking brain mind and behavior. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 73(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.11.008.

29.

Mhuireach

G. Á.

Dietz

Griffiths

Horve

P. F.

(2021). Differing effects of four building materials on viable bacterial communities and VOCs. Developments in the https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165921000144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100055

30.

Molero-Ramírez

F. J.

Carro-Godoy

R. L.

(2022). The hydrated mind, the glycolytic mind, and the holobiont mind. Adaptive Behavior. 2022, 10597123211073534. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211073534

31.

Nagpal

Cryan

J. F.

(2021). Host genetics, the microbiome & behaviour-a “Holobiont” perspective [Review of Host genetics, the microbiome & behaviour-a “Holobiont” perspective]. Cell Research, 31(8), 832–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-021-00512-x.

32.

Nelson

L. D.

Simmons

Simonsohn

(2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836.

33.

Palacios-García

Luarte

Herrmann-Lunecke

M. G.

Grasso-Cladera

Parada

F. J.

(2020). Environmental noise is differently associated with negative and positive urban experience: An exploratory first-person pedestrian mobile study in Santiago de Chile (El ruido medioambiental se asocia de una manera diferente a la experiencia urbana negativa y positiva: Un estudio exploratorio en movimiento de peatones en primera persona realizado en Santiago de Chile). Studies in Psychology, 41(3), 580–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2020.1795376

34.

Palacios-García

Parada

F. J.

(2019). Measuring the brain-gut axis in psychological sciences: A necessary challenge. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 13, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00073

35.

Palacios-García

Parada

F. J.

(2021). The holobiont mind: A bridge between 4E cognition and the microbiome. Adaptive Behavior, 2021, 10597123211053071. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211053071

36.

Parada

F. J.

(2018). Understanding natural cognition in everyday settings: 3 pressing challenges. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00386.

37.

Parada

F. J.

Rossi

(2018). If neuroscience needs behavior, what does psychology need?. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00433.

38.

Parada

F. J.

Rossi

(2020). Perfect timing: Mobile brain/body imaging scaffolds the 4E-cognition research program. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(12), 8081–8091. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14783.

39.

Piñeyro Salvidegoitia

Jacobsen

Bauer

A. R.

Griffiths

Hanslmayr

Debener

(2019). Out and about: Subsequent memory effect captured in a natural outdoor environment with smartphone EEG. Psychophysiology, 56(5), e13331. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13331.

40.

Postler

T. S.

Ghosh

(2017). Understanding the holobiont: How microbial metabolites affect human health and shape the immune system. Cell Metabolism, 26(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.008.

41.

Ramírez-Vizcaya

Froese

(2019). The enactive approach to habits: New concepts for the cognitive science of bad habits and addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301.

42.

Rojas-Líbano

Parada

F. J.

(2019). Body-world coupling, sensorimotor mechanisms, and the ontogeny of social cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03005.

43.

Rojas-Líbano

Wimmer Del Solar

Aguilar-Rivera

Montefusco-Siegmund

Maldonado

P. E.

(2018). Local cortical activity of distant brain areas can phase-lock to the olfactory bulb’s respiratory rhythm in the freely behaving rat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120(3), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00088.2018.

44.

Rook

G. A.

Lowry

C. A.

Raison

C. L.

(2013). Microbial “Old Friends.” immunoregulation and Stress Resilience. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2013(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eot004.

45.

Rossi

Parada

F. J.

Stewart

Barwell

Demas

Allen

(2018). Hormonal correlates of exploratory and play-soliciting behavior in domestic dogs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01559.

46.

Rossi

Smedema

Parada

F. J.

Allen

(2014). Visual attention in dogs and the evolution of non-verbal communication. In Horowitz

(Ed.), Domestic dog cognition and behavior: The scientific study of canis familiaris (pp. 133–154). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53994-7_6.

47.

Salas

C. E.

Rojas-Líbano

Castro

Cruces

Evans

Radovic

Arévalo-Romero

Torres

Aliaga

Á.

(2021). Social isolation after acquired brain injury: Exploring the relationship between network size, functional support, loneliness and mental health. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2021, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2021.1939062.

48.

Shamay-Tsoory

S. G.

Mendelsohn

(2019). Real-life neuroscience: An ecological approach to brain and behavior research. Perspectives on psychological science. A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 14(5), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619856350.

49.

Stamper

C. E.

Hoisington

A. J.

Gomez

O. M.

Halweg-Edwards

A. L.

Smith

D. G.

Bates

K. L.

Kinney

K. A.

Postolache

T. T.

Brenner

L. A.

Rook

G. A.

Lowry

C. A.

(2016). The microbiome of the built environment and human behavior: Implications for emotional health and well-being in postmodern western societies. International Review of Neurobiology, 131, 289–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2016.07.006.

50.

Thelen

Smith

L. B.

(1996) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.

51.

Varela

F. J.

Thompson

Rosch

(1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

52.

Vuong

H. E.

Hsiao

E. Y.

(2017). Emerging roles for the gut microbiome in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 81(5), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.024.

53.

Zilber-Rosenberg

Rosenberg

(2008). Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: The hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 32(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x.