The increase of violence in Mexico and consequent suffering during the last decades is evident, but its effects over feelings and moral judgments remain uncertain. We used journalistic news showing real-life situations to investigate the effects of facing violence over the experience of four moral emotions which represent powerful impulses for social actions in situations of suffering linked to violence: Negative Compassion, Positive Compassion, Schadenfreude, and Indignation. We evaluate brain activation by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during three cognitive conditions: reading, introspection, and resting. When reading the news, only Indignation-evoking stimuli elicited salient brain activations in the posterior cerebellum, and temporal and parietal cortical regions, whose functions are related to anger experiences and processing of socially relevant circumstances. When introspecting the emotional experience, cerebellar, frontal, parietal, and occipital activations related to self-focused experiences were observed for all emotions. When resting after facing the stimuli, only the Negative Compassion emotion elicited brain activations in the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus related to emotional self-reference processing; thus, negative compassion may produce more perdurable cognitive-affective effects related to sadness while perceiving suffering in others. Our results may suggest different emotional-based social decisions to face suffering and violence and to motivate pro-social actions in the collectivistic Mexican culture.
AburtoJ. M.Beltrán-SánchezH. (2019). Upsurge of homicides and its impact on life expectancy and life span inequality in Mexico, 2005-2015. American Journal of Public Health, 109(3), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304878
2.
AburtoJ. M.Beltrán-SánchezH.García-GuerreroV. M.Canudas-RomoV. (2016). Homicides in Mexico reversed life expectancy gains for men and slowed them for women, 2000-10. Health Affairs, 35(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0068
3.
AltmannU.BohrnI. C.LubrichO.MenninghausW.JacobsA. M. (2012). The power of emotional valence—From cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(192), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192
4.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.
5.
Ávila-ZesattiC. (2018). La paz que sí existe (y que el periodismo ignora): Veinte historias para leer en tipos de guerra [The peace that does exists but journalism ignore: Twenty stories to read in war times]. Texere Ediciones
6.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). MIT Press.
BotvinickM.JhaA. P.BylsmaL. M.FabianS. A.SolomonP. E.PrkachinK. M. (2005). Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain. NeuroImage, 25(1), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.043
9.
BucknerR. L.Andrews-HannaJ. R.SchacterD. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. In KingstoneA.MillerM. B. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 1124. The year in cognitive neuroscience 2008 (pp. 1–38). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011
10.
BzdokD.SchilbachL.VogeleyK.SchneiderK.LairdA. R.LangnerR.EickhoffS. B. (2012). Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Structure and Function, 217(4), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y
11.
CacioppoJ. T.GardnerW. L.BerntsonG. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839
12.
Canudas-RomoV.AburtoJ. M.García-GuerreroV. M.Beltrán-SánchezH. (2017). Mexico’s epidemic of violence and its public health significance on average length of life. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(2), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-207015
Casas PatiñoD.Rodríguez TorresA.Salazar MoralesM. R. (2016). Violence in Mexico: A social or public health problem?Medwave, 16(2), Article e6399. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2016.02.6399
15.
ChangL. J.YarkoniT.KhawM. W.SanfeyA. G. (2013). Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: Functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cerebral Cortex, 23(3), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs065
ChowH. M.MarR. A.XuY.LiuS.WagageS.BraunA. R. (2014). Embodied comprehension of stories: Interactions between language regions and modality-specific neural systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00487
18.
CikaraM.FiskeS. T. (2011). Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets’ (Mis)fortunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3791–3803. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00069
19.
CloningerC. R.SvrakicD. M.PrzybeckT. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. https://doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008
20.
Corradi-Dell’AcquaC.HofstetterC.VuilleumierP. (2014). Cognitive and affective theory of mind share the same local patterns of activity in posterior temporal but not medial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst097
21.
CuencasR.Von SeggernB.ToledoR.HarrelkE. H. (1990). El inventario de Edimburgo: Evaluación de la lateralidad cerebral en una población mexicana [The Edinburgh Inventory: Evaluation of brain laterality in a Mexican sample]. Salud Mental, 13(2), 11–17.
22.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85), 1–17.
23.
DecetyJ.LammC. (2009). Empathy versus personal distress: Recent evidence from social neuroscience. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 199–213). MIT Press.
24.
de la CabadaM. L.Jiménez TerrazasP. (2011). Un estudio comparativo del estrés percibido en estudiantes de ciencias administrativas y biológicas en tiempos de violencia [Stress perception of students of administrative and biological sciences in periods of violence: A comparative study]. Contaduría y Administración, 233, 105–125.
25.
de QuervainD. J. F.FischbacherU.TreyerV.SchellhammerM.SchnyderU.BuckA.FehrE. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100735
26.
DíazJ. L.FloresE. O. (2001). La estructura de la emoción humana: Un modelo cromático del sistema afectivo [The structure of human emotions: A chromatic model of the affective system]. Salud Mental, 24(4), 20–35.
27.
Díaz-GuerreroR. (1984). La psicología de los mexicanos: Un Paradigma [Mexican psychology: A paradigm]. Revista Mexicana De Psicología, 1(2), 95–104.
28.
Díaz-GuerreroR. (2003). Bajo las garras de la cultura: psicología del mexicano 2 [Under the claws of culture: Psychology of the Mexican 2]. Trillas.
EchavarríaC. V.QuinteroM.& VascoE. (2007). Algunas concepciones de justicia de un grupo de estudiantes universitarios de dos ciudades del país [Some conceptions of justice in a group of university students in two different cities]. In VascoS.AlvaradoC.EchavarríaBoteroP. (Eds.), Justicia, moral y subjetividad política en niños, niñas y jóvenes [Justice, morality and political subjectivity in children and young people] (pp. 9–21). Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Niñez y Juventud/Fundación Centro Internacional de Educación y Desarrollo Humano.
31.
EisenbergN.EggumN. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 71–83). MIT Press.
EstévezA. (2015). La crisis de derechos humanos y el dispositivo de administraciœn del sufrimiento: Necropolítica pública de víctimas, defensores y periodistas en México [The crisis of Human Rights and mechanisms to manage suffering: Public necropolitics for victims, defenders and journalists in Mexico]. El Cotidiano, 194, 7–17.
34.
EtkinA.EgnerT.KalischR. (2011). Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004
35.
FalconerC. J.LobmaierJ. S.ChristoforouM.KambojS. K.KingJ. A.GilbertP.BrewinC. R. (2019). Compassionate faces: Evidence for distinctive facial expressions associated with specific prosocial motivations. PLOS ONE, 14(1), Article e0210283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210283
36.
FerrandoL.BobesJ.GibertJ.SotoM.SotoO. (2000). MINI Entrevista Neuropsiquiátrica Internacional [MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MINI]. Instrumentos de Detección Orientación Diagnóstica.
37.
FierroH. F.FloresJ. I.AyllónS. L.ValadézD. (2011). Encuesta Nacional de Cultura Constitucional: legalidad, legitimidad de las instituciones y rediseño del Estado [National survey of constitutional culture: Legality, legitimacy of institutions and the State redesigning]. IFE, IIJ-UNAM.
38.
Flores-MartínezI.AtuestaL. H. (2018). Mourning our dead: The impact of Mexico’s war on drugs on citizens’ depressive symptoms. International Journal of Drug Policy, 60, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.004
39.
FossatiP.HevenorS. J.GrahamS. J.GradyC.KeightleyM. L.CraikF.MaybergH. (2003). In search of the emotional self: An fMRI study using positive and negative emotional words. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(11), 1938–1945. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.1938
40.
FourieM. M.SteinD. J.SolmsM.Gobodo-MadikizelaP.DecetyJ. (2017). Empathy and moral emotions in post-apartheid South Africa: An fMRI investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx019
41.
FriedericiA. D.RüschemeyerS. A.HahneA.FiebachC. J. (2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.2.170
42.
FristonK. J. (2000). Experimental design and statistical issues. In MazziotaJ. C.TogaA. W.FrackowiakR. S. J. (Eds.), Brain mapping. The disorders (pp. 33–58). Academic Press.
43.
GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD.Simon-ThomasE. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 36(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807
44.
González-SantosL.MercadilloR. E.GraffA.BarriosF. A. (2007). Versión computarizada para la aplicación del Listado de Sóntomas 90 (SCL 90) y del Inventario de Temperamento y Carácter (ITC) [Computerized version for the Symptom Check List 90 (SCL 89) and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI)]. Salud Mental, 30(4), 31–40.
GusnardD. A.AkbudakE.ShulmanG. L.RaichleM. E. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(7), 4259–4264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071043098
48.
GusnardD. A.RaichleM. E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094500
49.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Series in affective science. Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
50.
HernándezG. R.Cruz CalderónK. P. (2014). Percepción del clima emocional, problemas sociales y confianza institucional en tiempos de violencia [Perception of the emotional climate, social problems and institutional trust in times of violence]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.1.2014.11
51.
Hernández-ChávezP. (2016). Modularidad cognitiva y especialización cerebral [Cognitive modularity and brain specialization]. Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
HorbergE. J.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402384
54.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408
55.
Immordino-YangM. H.McCollA.DamasioH.DamasioA. (2009). Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(19), 8021–8026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810363106
56.
Instituto Nacional Electoral. (2014). Informe País sobre la Calidad de la Ciudadanía en México [País Report on Citizenship Quality in Mexico]. Instituto Nacional Electoral.
57.
JavelaJ. J.MercadilloR. E.RamírezJ. M. (2008). Anger and associated experiences of sadness, fear, valence, arousal, and dominance evoked by visual scenes. Psychological Reports, 103(3), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.103.3.663-681
58.
JenkinsonM.BannisterP.BradyM.SmithS. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17(2), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1132
59.
JenkinsonM.SmithS. (2001). A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6
60.
KédiaG.BerthozS.WessaM.HiltonD.MartinotJ. L. (2008). An agent harms a victim: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on specific moral emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(10), 1788–1798. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20070
61.
KimJ. W.KimS. E.KimJ. J.JeongB.ParkC. H.SonA. R.SongE. J.KiS. W. (2009). Compassionate attitude towards others’ suffering activates the mesolimbic neural system. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2073–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.017
62.
KörnerA.TscharaktschiewN.SchindlerR.SchulzK.RudolphU. (2016). The everyday moral judge—Autobiographical recollections of moral emotions. PLOS ONE, 11(12), Article e0167224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167224
63.
Koster-HaleJ.SaxeR.DunganJ.YoungL. L. (2013). Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(14), 5648–5653. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207992110
64.
KurthF.ZillesK.FoxP. T.LairdA. R.EickhoffS. B. (2010). A link between the systems: Functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Structure & Function, 214(5–6), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z
LahnakoskiJ. M.GlereanE.SalmiJ.JääskeläinenI. P.SamsM.HariR.NummenmaaL. (2012). Naturalistic fMRI mapping reveals superior temporal sulcus as the hub for the distributed brain network for social perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00233
LeechR.SharpD. J. (2014). The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain, 137(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt162
69.
LeinerM.PuertasH.CaratacheaR.AvilaC.AtluruA.BrionesD.de VargasC. (2012). Children’s mental health and collective violence: A binational study on the United States-Mexico border. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 31(5), 411–416.
70.
LiangJ. C.WagnerA. D.PrestonA. R. (2013). Content representation in the human medial temporal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr379
MelloniM.LopezV.IbanezA. (2014). Empathy and contextual social cognition. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0205-3
73.
MercadilloR. E.AlcauterS.Fernández-RuizJ.BarriosF. A. (2015). Police culture influences the brain function underlying compassion: A gender study. Social Neuroscience, 10(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.977402
74.
MercadilloR. E.BarriosF. A.DíazJ. L. (2007a). Definition of compassion-evoking images in a Mexican sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(2), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.105.2.661-676
75.
MercadilloR. E.BarriosF. A.DíazJ. L. (2007b). Neurobiology of moral emotions. Salud Mental, 30(3), 1–11.
76.
MercadilloR. E.DíazJ. L.PasayeE. H.BarriosF. A. (2011). Perception of suffering and compassion experience: Brain gender disparities. Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.019
77.
MercadilloR. E.Fernandez-RuizJ.CadenaO.Domínguez-SalazarE.PasayeE. H.Velázquez-MoctezumaJ. (2017). The Franciscan Prayer elicits empathic and cooperative intentions in atheists: A neurocognitive and phenomenological enquiry. Frontiers in Sociology, 2, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00022
78.
MercadilloR. E.GalvezV.DíazR.ParedesL.Velázquez-MoctezumaJ.Hernandez-CastilloC. R.Fernandez-RuizJ. (2015). Social and cultural elements associated with neurocognitive dysfunctions in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00090
79.
MichaelsenM. M. (2012). Mental health and labour supply—Evidence from Mexico’s ongoing violent conflicts. Ruhr Economic Paper No. 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199470
80.
MichelV. H. (2013). Morir en Malasia: una crónica sobre los desechables del narco [To die in Malaysia: a chronicle about the disposables of narco]. Océano.
81.
MolenberghsP.LouisW. R. (2018). Insights from fMRI studies into ingroup bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01868
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.EslingerP. J.BramatiI. E.Mourão-MirandaJ.AndreiuoloP. A.PessoaL. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02730.2002
84.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.MollF. T.IgnacioF. A.BramatiI. E.Caparelli-DaquerE. M.EslingerP. J. (2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000152236.46475.a7
85.
MollJ.KruegerF.ZahnR.PardiniM.de Oliveira-SouzaR.GrafmanJ. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(42), 15623–15628. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604475103
86.
Mourão-MirandaJ.VolchanE.MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.OliveiraL.BramatiI.… PessoaL. (2003). Contributions of stimulus valence and arousal to visual activation during emotional perception. NeuroImage, 20(4), 1955–1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.011
NummenmaaL.HirvonenJ.ParkkolaR.HietanenJ. K. (2008). Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy. NeuroImage, 43(3), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.014
89.
OchsnerK. N.KnierimK.LudlowD. H.HanelinJ.RamachandranT.GloverG.MackeyS. C. (2004). Reflecting upon feelings: An fMRI study of neural systems supporting the attribution of emotion to self and other. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1746–1772. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042947829
90.
OvalleL. P. (2005). Entre la indiferencia y la satanizaciœn. Representaciones sociales del narcotrÃfico desde la perspectiva de los universitarios de Tijuana [Between indifference and demonization. Social representations of drug-trafficking from the perspective of university students in Tijuana]. Culturales, 1(2), 63–89.
91.
PanstersW.Castillo BerthierH. (2007). Mexico City. In KooningsK.KruijtD. (Eds.), Fractured cities: Social exclusion, urban violence and contested spaces in Latin America (pp. 36–56). Zed Books.
92.
Pérez-AlbénizA.de PaúlJ.EtxeberríaJ.Paz-MontesM.TorresE. (2003). Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity English (IRI) al Español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267–272.
93.
PerryA.Shamay-TsooryS. (2013). Understanding emotional and cognitive empathy: A neuropsychological perspective. In Baron-CohenS.Tager-FlusbergH.LombardoM. V. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 178–194). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692972.003.0011
94.
PoldrackR. A.BakerC. I.DurnezJ.GorgolewskiK. J.MatthewsP. M.MunafòM. R.NicholsT. E.PolineJ. B.VulE.YarkoniT. (2017). Scanning the horizon: Towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167
95.
PorgesE. C.DecetyJ. (2013). Violence as a source of pleasure or displeasure is associated with specific functional connectivity with the nucleus accumbens. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00447
96.
ReniersR. L. E. P.CorcoranR.VöllmB. A.MashruA.HowardR.LiddleP. F. (2012). Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009
97.
RidderinkhofK. R.UllspergerM.CroneE. A.NieuwenhuisS. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306(5695), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100301
98.
RiskoE. F.LaidlawK. E. W.FreethM.FoulshamT.KingstoneA. (2012). Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143
99.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
100.
RubyP.DecetyJ. (2004). How would You feel versus how do you think She would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502661
101.
SabatinelliD.BradleyM. M.LangP. J.CostaV. D.VersaceF. (2007). Pleasure rather than salience activates human nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1374–1379. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00230.2007
102.
Sánchez-AragónR.Díaz-LovingR. (2009). Reglas y preceptos culturales de la expresión emocional en México: su medición [Cultural rules and precepts of emotional expression in Mexico: Its measurement]. Universitas Psychologica, 8(3), 793–830.
103.
SchindlerR.KörnerA.BauerS.HadjiS.RudolphU. (2015). Causes and consequences of schadenfreude and sympathy: A developmental analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0137669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137669
104.
ScholzJ.TriantafyllouC.Whitfield-GabrieliS.BrownE. N.SaxeR. (2009). Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PLOS ONE, 4(3), Article e4869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004869
105.
SchurzM.RaduaJ.AichhornM.RichlanF.PernerJ. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42(42), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009
106.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
107.
Simon-ThomasE. R.GodzikJ.CastleE.AntonenkoO.PonzA.KoganA.KeltnerD. J. (2012). An fMRI study of caring vs self-focus during induced compassion and pride. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr045
SingerT.SeymourB.O’DohertyJ. P.StephanK. E.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075), 466–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04271
110.
SmithR. H.PowellC. A. J.CombsD. J. Y.SchurtzD. R. (2009). Exploring the when and why of Schadenfreude. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00181.x
111.
SmithR. H.TurnerT. J.GaronzikR.LeachC. W.Urch-DruskatV.WestonC. M. (1996). Envy and Schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296222005
SmithS. M.JenkinsonM.WoolrichM. W.BeckmannC. F.BehrensT. E. J.Johansen-BergH.BannisterP. R.De LucaM.DrobnjakI.FlitneyD. E.NiazyR. K.SaundersJ.VickersJ.ZhangY.De StefanoN.BradyM.MatthewsP. M. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage, 23, S208–S219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
114.
SmythiesJ. R.EdelsteinL. R.RamachandranV. S. (2014). Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum. In SmythiesJ. R.EdelsteinL. R.RamachandranV. S. (Eds.), The Claustrum: Structural, functional, and clinical neuroscience (pp. 299–352). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404566-8.00013-1
115.
SoonC. S.BrassM.HeinzeH. J.HaynesJ. D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11(5), 543–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2112
116.
SpitsynaG.WarrenJ. E.ScottS. K.TurkheimerF. E.WiseR. J. S. (2006). Converging language streams in the human temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(28), 7328–7336. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0559-06.2006
117.
StoodleyC. J.SchmahmannJ. D. (2010). Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex, 46(7), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008
118.
TakahashiH.KatoM.MatsuuraM.MobbsD.SuharaT.OkuboY. (2009). When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: Neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude. Science, 323(5916), 937–939. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165604
119.
TakahashiH.YahataN.KoedaM.MatsudaT.AsaiK.OkuboY. (2004). Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23(3), 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.054
120.
van DijkW. W.OuwerkerkJ. W.GoslingaS. (2009). The impact of deservingness on schadenfreude and sympathy: Further evidence. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(3), 390–392. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.3.390-392
121.
van DijkW. W.OuwerkerkJ. W.GoslingaS.NiewegM.GallucciM. (2006). When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in Schadenfreude. Emotion, 149(3), 390–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.156
WakeS. J.IzumaK. (2017). A common neural code for social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx092
124.
WatsonR.LatinusM.CharestI.CrabbeF.BelinP. (2014). People-selectivity, audiovisual integration and heteromodality in the superior temporal sulcus. Cortex, 50(100), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.011
125.
WechslerD. (2014). WAIS-IV: Escala de Inteligencia Wechsler para Adultos [Wechsler WAIS-IV: Adult Intelligence Scale]. Manual Moderno.
126.
WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
127.
WengH. Y.FoxA. S.ShackmanA. J.StodolaD. E.CaldwellJ. Z. K.OlsonM. C.RogersG. M.DavidsonR. J. (2013). Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612469537
128.
WengH. Y.LapateR. C.StodolaD. E.RogersG. M.DavidsonR. J. (2018). Visual attention to suffering after compassion training is associated with decreased amygdala responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00771
129.
WhitneyC.KirkM.O’SullivanJ.Lambon RalphM. A.JefferiesE. (2011). The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 21(5), 1066–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq180
130.
WoolrichM. W.RipleyB. D.BradyM.SmithS. M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. NeuroImage, 14(6), 1370–1386. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
131.
WorsleyK. J. (2012). Statistical analysis of activation images. In JezzardP.MatthewsP. M.SmithS. M. (Eds.), Functional magnetic resonance imaging: An introduction to methods (pp. 251–270). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192630711.003.0014
132.
YoungA. (2011). Empathic cruelty and the origins of the social brain. In ChoudhuryS.SlabyJ. (Eds.), Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience (pp. 159–176). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359.ch7
133.
ZahnR.de Oliveira-SouzaR.MollJ. (2011). The neuroanatomical basis of moral cognition and emotion. In EbsteinR.Shamay-TsooryS.ChewS. H. (Eds.), From DNA to social cognition (pp. 123–138). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118101803.ch8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
