I agree with Villalobos and Razeto-Barry’s main argument that living beings are autopoietic bodies. I suggest, however, that if we apply this definition of life to a consideration of living beings as dissipative systems, we find opportunities for further refinement. I propose that living bodies are autopoietic bodies that maintain themselves by using their boundaries to control their constituent processes of dissipative adaptation.
AttardP. (2012). Optimising principle for non-equilibrium phase transitions and pattern formation with results for heat convection. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5105
2.
BarrettN. F. (2019). On the nature and origins of cognition as a form of motivated activity. Adaptive Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1059712318824325
3.
DixonJ.KondepudiD.DavisT. J. (2015). End-directedness and context in nonliving dissipative systems. In DzhafarovE. N. (Ed.), Contextuality from quantum physics to psychology (pp. 185–206). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Press.
4.
EnglandJ. L. (2015). Dissipative adaptation in driven self-assembly. Nature Nanotechnology, 10, 919–923.
5.
SwensonR.TurveyM. T. (1991). Thermodynamic reasons for perception-action cycles. Ecological Psychology, 3, 317–348.
6.
VillalobosM.Razeto-BarryP. (2019). Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply. Adaptive Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1059712318823723
