We review issues stemming from current models regarding the drivers of cultural complexity and cultural evolution. We disagree with the implication of the treadmill model, based on dual-inheritance theory, that population size is the driver of cultural complexity. The treadmill model reduces the evolution of artifact complexity, measured by the number of parts, to the statistical fact that individuals with high skills are more likely to be found in a larger population than in a smaller population. However, for the treadmill model to operate as claimed, implausibly high skill levels must be assumed. Contrary to the treadmill model, the risk hypothesis for the complexity of artifacts relates the number of parts to increased functional efficiency of implements. Empirically, all data on hunter-gatherer artifact complexity support the risk hypothesis and reject the treadmill model. Still, there are conditions under which increased technological complexity relates to increased population size, but the dependency does not occur in the manner expressed in the treadmill model. Instead, it relates to population size when the support system for the technology requires a large population size. If anything, anthropology and ecology suggest that cultural complexity generates high population density rather than the other way around.
AcerbiA.MesoudiA. (2015). If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 30, 481–503.
2.
AnderssonC. (2013). Fidelity and the emergence of stable and cumulative sociotechnical systems. Palaeoanthropology, 2013, 88–103.
3.
AnderssonC.ReadD. (2014). Group size and cultural complexity. Nature, 511, E1. doi:10.1038/nature13411
4.
AnderssonC.ReadD. (2016). The evolution of cultural complexity: Not by the treadmill alone. Current Anthropology, 57, 261–286.
5.
AnderssonC.TörnbergA.TörnbergP. (2014a). An evolutionary developmental approach to cultural evolution. Current Anthropology, 55, 154–174. doi:10.1086/675692
6.
AnderssonC.TörnbergA.TörnbergP. (2014b). Societal systems: Complex or worse?Futures, 63, 145–157.
7.
AnderssonC.TörnbergA.TörnbergP. (in press). Wicked systems and the friction between “old theory and new data” in biology, social science and archaeology. In LoveA.WimsattW. C. (Eds.), Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
AnderssonC.TörnbergP. (2018). Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures, 95, 118–138.
9.
AsfawB.BeyeneY.SuwaG.WalterR. C.WhiteT. D.WoldegabrielG.YemaneT. (1992). The earliest Acheulean from Konso-Gardula. Nature, 360, 732–734.
10.
AvruchK. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
11.
BaldwinM. J. (1896). A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, 30, 441–451.
12.
BarrettL.HenziP. (2005). The social nature of primate cognition. Proceedings Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 272, 1865–1875.
13.
BinfordL. R. (1980). Willow smoke and dog’s tails: Hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity, 45, 4–20.
14.
BinfordL. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
BoeschC.BoeschH. (1983). Optimisation of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 83, 265–286.
16.
BoydR. (2018). A different kind of animal: How culture transformed our species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
BubandtN.OttoT. (2010). Anthropology and the predicaments of holism. In OttoT.BubandtN. (Eds.), Experiments in holism (pp. 1–15). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
BuchananB.O’BrienM. J.CollardM. (2015). Drivers of technological richness in prehistoric Texas: An archaeological test of the population size and environmental risk hypotheses. Archaeological and Anthropological Science, 8, 625–634. doi:10.1007/s12520-015-0245-4
20.
BurdettE. R.DeanR. L. G.RonfardS. (2017). A diverse and flexible teaching toolkit facilitates the human capacity for cumulative culture. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9, 807–818. doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0345-4
21.
CaldwellC. A.MillenA. E. (2010). Human cumulative culture in the laboratory: Effects of (micro) population size. Learning & Behavior, 38, 310–318.
22.
CampbellD. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
23.
CampbellD. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In BarringerH. R.BlankstenG. I.MackR. W. (Eds.), Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory (pp. 19–48). Cambridge, UK: Schenkman Publishing.
24.
CampbellD. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In SchilppP. A. (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 413–463). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
25.
CastroL.ToroM. A. (2014). Cumulative cultural evolution: The role of teaching. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 347, 74–83.
26.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L.FeldmanM. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
ChattersJ. C. (1995). Population growth, climatic cooling, and the development of collector strategies on the Southern Plateau, Western North America. Journal of World Prehistory, 1995, 341–400.
28.
Chit HlaingF. K. L.ReadDwight W. (2016). Why marriage?Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences, 9(2). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/56b9b0rb
29.
CollardM.BuchananB.MorinJ.CostopoulosA. (2011). What drives the evolution of hunter-gatherer subsistence technology? A reanalysis of the risk hypothesis with data from the Pacific Northwest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1129–1138.
30.
CollardM.BuchananB.O’BrienM. J. (2013). Population size as an explanation for patterns in the Paleolithic archaeological record: More caution is needed. Current Anthropology, 54, S388–S396.
31.
CollardM.BuchananB.O’BrienM. J.ScholnickJ. (2013). Risk mobility or population size? Drivers of technological richness among contact-period western North American hunter-gatherers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20120412. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0412
32.
CollardM.BuchananB.RuttleA.O’BrienM. J. (2011). Niche construction and the toolkits of hunter-gatherers and food producers. Biological Theory, 6, 251–259.
33.
CollardM.KemeryM. D.BanksS. (2005). Causes of toolkit variation among hunter-gatherers: A test of four competing hypotheses. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 29, 1–19.
34.
CollardM.RuttleA.BuchananB.O’BrienM. J. (2013). Population size and cultural evolution in non-industrial food-producing societies. PLoS ONE, 8, e72628.
35.
CorbeyR.JagichA.VaesenK.CollardM. (2016). The Acheulean hand axe: More like a bird’s song than a Beatles’ tune?Evolutionary Anthropology, 25, 6–19.
36.
Costa-PeirceB. A. (1985). A Aquaculture in ancient Hawaii. Bioscience, 37, 320–331.
CsibraG.GergelyG. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 366, 1149–1157.
39.
DeanL. G.ValeG. L.LalandK. N.FlynnE.KendalR. L. (2014). Human cumulative culture: A comparative perspective. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 89, 284–301.
40.
DerexM.BeuginM-. P.GodelleB.RaymondM. (2013). Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature, 503, 389–391.
D’ErricoF.BanksW. E. (2013). Identifying mechanisms behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age cultural trajectories. Current Anthropology, 54, S371–S387.
43.
DiamondJ. (1978). The Tasmanians: The longest isolation, the simplest technology. Nature, 273, 185–186.
44.
Diez-MartínF.Sánchez YustosP.UribelarreaD.BAQuedanoE.MarkD. F.MabullaA.… Domínguez-RodrigoM. (2015). The origin of the Acheulean: The 1.7 million-year-old site of FLK West Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Scientific Reports, 5, 1–9.
45.
DurhamW. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
EerkensJ. W.LipoC. P. (2005). Cultural transmission copying errors and the generation of variation in material culture and the archeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 316–334.
47.
EerkensJ. W.LipoC. P. (2007). Cultural transmission theory and the archeological record: Providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 239–274.
48.
El GuindiF. (2015, November18–22). Westermarck! Paper presented at 114th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Colorado Convention Center. Los Angeles, CA: El Nil Research.
49.
El GuindiF.ReadD. (2012). Westermarck hypothesis reconsidered: A comment on Kushnick and Fessler. Current Anthropology, 53, 134–135.
FerraroG. (1998). The cultural dimension of international business (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
FirthR. (1951). Elements of social organization. London, England: Watts.
53.
FlanneryK. V. (1969). Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East. In UckoP. J.DimblebyG. W. (Eds.), The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals (pp. 73–100). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
54.
FoleyR. A. (1987). Hominid species and stone tools assemblages: How are they related?Antiquity, 61, 380–392.
55.
FortesM. (1969). Kinship and the social order: The legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
56.
GalefB. G. (1992). The question of animal culture. Human Nature, 3, 157–178.
57.
GalefB. G.LalandL. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience, 55, 489–499.
58.
GärdenforsPHögbergA. (2017). The archaeology of teaching and the evolution ofHomo docens. Current Anthropology, 58, 188–208.
59.
GilliganI. (2007). Another Tasmanian paradox: Clothing and thermal adaptations in Aboriginal Australia (BAR International Series 1710). Oxford, UK: Archaeopress.
60.
GilliganI. (2014). Clothing and modern human behavior: The challenge from Tasmania. In DennellR.PorrM. (Eds.), Southern Asia, Australia and the search for human origins (pp. 189–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
GoodenoughW. (ed.) (1964). Explorations in cultural anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
62.
GravesP. (1994). Flakes and ladders: What the archaeological record cannot tell us about origins of language. World Archaeology, 26, 158–171.
63.
GreenbergC. (1961). Art and culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
64.
HageP. (1997). Unthinkable categories and the fundamental laws of kinship. American Ethnologist, 24, 652–667.
65.
HelgasonA.PálssonG.PedersenH. S.AngulalikE.GunnarsdóttirE. D.YngvadóttirB.StefánssonK. (2006). mtDNA variation in Inuit populations of Greenland and Canada: Migration history and population structure. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 130, 123–134.
66.
HenrichJ. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: Why adaptive cultural processes produced maladaptive losses in Tasmania. American Antiquity, 69, 197–214.
67.
HenrichJ. (2006). Understanding cultural evolutionary models: A reply to Read’s critique. American Antiquity, 71, 771–782.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.
70.
HerbertC. (1991). Culture and anomie: Ethnographic imagination in the nineteenth century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71.
HodderI. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
72.
HoijerH. (1948). Linguistic and cultural change. Language, 24, 335–345.
73.
JonesR. (1977). The Tasmanian paradox. In WrightV.S. (Ed.), Stone tools as cultural markers: Change, evolution and complexity (pp. 189–204). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
74.
KeeleyL. H. (1988). Hunter-gatherer economic complexity and “population pressure”: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7, 373–411.
75.
KempeM.MesoudiA. (2014). An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 285–290.
76.
KlineM. A. (2015). How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e31.
77.
KlineM. A.BoydR. (2010). Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 2559–2564.
78.
KroeberA. L. (1919). On the principle of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion. American Anthropologist, 21, 235–263.
79.
LalandK. N.JanikV. M. (2006). The animal cultures debate. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 542–547.
80.
LaneD. A. (2016). Innovation cascades: Artefacts organization and attributions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 371, 20150194. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0194
81.
LaneD. A.MaxfieldR. M.ReadD.van der LeeuwS. (2009). From population to organization thinking. In LaneD.PumainD.van der LeeuwS. E.WestG. (Eds.), Complexity perspective in innovation and social change (pp. 11–42). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
82.
LaubichlerM. D.MaienscheinJ. (2007). From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution (LaubichlerM. D.MaienscheinJ., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
83.
LaubichlerM. D.MaienscheinJ. (2013). Developmental evolution. In RuseM. (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought (pp. 375–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
LaubichlerM. D.RennJ. (2015). Extended evolution: A conceptual framework for integrating regulatory networks and niche construction. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution B, 324, 7565–7577.
85.
LeachE. (1965). Culture and cohesion. An anthropologist's view. Daedalus, 94, 24–38.
86.
LeafM.ReadD. (2012). Human thought and social organization: Anthropology on a new plane. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
87.
LeavittG. C. (2005). Incest and inbreeding avoidance: A critique of Darwinian social science. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
88.
LeavittG. C. (2007). The incest taboo?: A reconsideration. Anthropological Theory, 7, 393–419.
LycettS. J.von Cramon-TaubadelN. (2015). Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 646–675.
91.
MarcotJ. D.McSheaD. W. (2007). Increasing hierarchical complexity throughout the history of life, phylogenetic tests of trend mechanisms. Paleobiology, 33, 182–200.
92.
MatsuzawaT. (1996). Chimpanzee intelligence in nature and in captivity: Isomorphism of symbol use and tool use. In McGrewW. C.MarchantL. F.NishidaT. (Eds.), Great ape societies (pp. 196–209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McCabeJ. (1983). FBD marriage: Further support for the Westermarck Hypothesis. American Anthropologist, 85, 50–69.
95.
McGrewW. C.HamR. M.WhiteL. J. T.TutinE. G.FernandezM. (1997). Why don’t chimpanzees in Gabon crack nuts?International Journal of Primatology, 18, 353–374.
96.
McSheaD. W. (1991). Complexity and evolution: What everybody knows. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 303–324.
97.
McSheaD. W. (2000). Functional complexity in organisms: Parts as proxies. Biology and Philosophy, 15, 641–668.
98.
MiddletonR. (1962). Brother-sister and father-daughter marriage in ancient Egypt. American Sociological Review, 27, 603–611.
99.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
100.
MulvaneyJ.KammingaJ. (1999). Prehistory of Australia. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
101.
MundtT. (1857). Pariser Kaiser-Skizzen (vols 2). Berlin, Germany: Verlag von Otto Janke.
102.
MuthukrishnaM.ShulmanB. W.VasilescuV.HenrichJ. (2014). Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20132511.
103.
O’BrienM. J.BentleyR. A. (2011). Stimulated variation and cascades: Two processes in the evolution of complex technological systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 18, 309–335.
104.
O’BrienM. J.LymanR. L.MesoudiA.VanPoolT. L. (2010). Cultural traits as units of analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3797–3806.
105.
OswaltW. H. (1976). An anthropological analysis of food-getting technology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
106.
PetersenR. (1984). East Greenland before 1950. In DamasD. (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians (vol. 5, pp. 622–639). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
107.
PetragliaM. D.ShiptonC. (2008). Large cutting tool variation west and east of the Movius Line. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 962–966.
108.
PingK. (1999). Cultural presuppositions and misreadings. Meta: theorie et pratique de la traduction en Chine, 44, 133–143.
109.
PowellA.ShennanS. J.ThomasM. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324, 1298–1301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165
110.
QuerbesA.VaesenK.HoukesW. (2014). Complexity and demographic explanations of cumulative culture. PLoS ONE, 9, e102543.
111.
ReadD. (1984). An algebraic account of the American kinship terminology. Current Anthropology, 25, 417–440.
112.
ReadD. (1987). Foraging society organization: A simple model of a complex transition. European Journal of Operational Research, 30, 320–326.
113.
ReadD. (2001). What is kinship? In FeinbergR.OttenheimerM. (Eds.), The cultural analysis of kinship: The legacy of David Schneider and its implications for anthropological relativism (pp. 78–117). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
114.
ReadD. (2006). Tasmanian knowledge and skill: Maladaptive imitation or adequate technology. American Antiquity, 73, 599–625.
115.
ReadD. (2007a). Artifact classification: A conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
116.
ReadD. (2007b). Kinship theory: A paradigm shift. Ethnology, 46, 329–364.
117.
ReadD. (2008). An interaction model for resource implement complexity based on risk and number of annual moves. American Antiquity, 73, 599–625.
118.
ReadD. (2011). The misuse of a mathematical model: The Tasmanian case (reply to Henrich’s response). UCLA: Human Complex Systems. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88k8g4rj
119.
ReadD. (2012a). How culture makes us human: Primate Social Evolution and the Formation of Human Societies. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
120.
ReadD. (2012b). Population size does not predict artifact complexity: Analysis of data from Tasmania Arctic hunter-gatherers and Oceania fishing groups. UCLA: Human Complex Systems. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61n4303q
121.
ReadD. (2014a). Incest taboos and kinship: A biological or a cultural story?Reviews in Anthropology, 43, 150–175.
122.
ReadD. (2014b). The substance of cultural evolution: Culturally framed systems of social organization: Comment on “Smaldino 2014 The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 270–271.
123.
ReadD. (2017, July5). From past to present: Kinship and the mission of anthropology
. Paper presented at Plenary Talk XII Congress of Anthropologists and Ethnographers of Russia, Izhevsk, Russia.
124.
ReadD. (2018, March30–31). The deep history of kinship takes us back to procreation, but procreation is not the story of kinship. Paper presented at Atelier D’analyse Anonyme, Paris, France (in the session titled: Peut-on penser á la parenté sans songer á la procreation?).
125.
ReadD.FischerM. D.Chit HlaingF. K. L. (2014). The cultural grounding of kinship: A paradigm shift. L’homme, 210, 63–89.
126.
ReadD.LaneD.van der LeeuwS. (2009). The innovation innovation. In LaneD.PumainD.van der LeeuwS. E.WestG. (Eds.), Complexity perspective in innovation and social change (pp. 43–84). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
127.
ReadD.van der LeeuwS. (2008). Biology is only part of the story …. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1959–1968.
128.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
129.
RouseI. (1939). Prehistory in Haiti: A study in method (Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 21). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
130.
RuffC. B.TrinkhausE.HollidayT. W. (1997). Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature, 387, 173–176. doi:10.1038/387173a0
131.
SanzC. M.MorganD. B. (2007). Chimpanzee tool technology in the Goualougo Triangle Republic of Congo. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 420–433.
132.
ScheidelW. (2005). Ancient Egyptian sibling marriage and the Westermarck effect. In WolfA. P.DurhamW. H. (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo (pp. 93–108). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
133.
ShennanS. J. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and some implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archeological Journal, 11, 5–16. doi:10.1017/s0959774301000014
134.
ShepherJ. (1983). Incest. A biosocial view. New York, NY: Academic Press.
135.
ShieldsW. M. (1982). Philopatry, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
136.
ShilsE. (1981). Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
137.
ShorE.SimchaiD. (2009). Incest avoidance, the incest taboo, and social cohesion: Revisiting Westermarck and the case of the Israeli kibbutzim. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1803–1842.
138.
ShorE.SimchaiD. (2012). Exposing the myth of sexual aversion in the Israeli kibbutzim: A challenge to the Westermarck hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1509–1513.
139.
ShottM. (1986). Technological organization and settlement mobility: An ethnographic examination. Journal of Anthropological Research, 42, 15–51.
140.
SimonH. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 6, 467–482.
141.
SmaldinoP. (2014). The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 243–295.
142.
SterelnyK. (2004). A review of “Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, edited by B. Weber and D. Depew.”Evolution & Development, 6, 295–300.
143.
SterelnyK. (2011). Evolvability reconsidered. In CalcottB.SterelnyK. (Eds.), The major transitions in evolution revisited (pp. 83–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
144.
StinerM. C. (2001). Thirty years on the “broad spectrum revolution” and Paleolithic demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 6993–6996.
145.
StinerM. C.MunroN. D.SurovellT. A. (2000). The tortoise and the hare. Current Anthropology, 41, 39–73.
146.
StoutD. (2011). Stone tool making and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 366, 1050–1059.
147.
SuttonM. Q. (2000). Strategy and tactic in the analysis of archaeological hunter-gatherer systems. North American Archaeologist, 21, 217–231.
148.
TaylorT. (2010). The artificial ape: How technology changed the course of human evolution. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
149.
TaylorW. (1967). A study of archeology (Memoir 69, American Anthropological Association). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1948).
150.
TehraniJ. J.RiedeF. (2008). Towards an archaeology of pedagogy: Learning teaching and the generation of material culture traditions. World Archaeology, 40, 316–331.
151.
TomaselloM. (1996). Do apes ape? In HeyesC. M.GalefB. G.Jr. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture (pp. 319–346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
152.
TorrenceR. (1983). Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology. In HalsteadP.O’SheaJ. (Eds.), Bad year economics: Cultural responses to risk and uncertainty (pp. 11–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
153.
TorrenceR. (1989). Re-tooling: Towards a behavioral theory of stone tools. In TorrenceR. (Ed.), Time energy and stone tools (pp. 57–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
154.
TorrenceR. (2000). Hunter-gatherer technology: Macro- and microscale approaches. In Panter-BrickC.LaytonR. H.Rowley-ConwyP. (Eds.), Hunter–gatherers: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 99–143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
155.
TurnerJ.MaryanskiA. (2009). Incest: Origins of the taboo. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
156.
TylorE. B. (1929). Primitive culture. London, England: J. Murray. (Original work published 1871)
157.
VaesenK.CollardM.CosgroveR.RoebroeksW. (2016). Population size does not explain past changes in cultural complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 113, E2241–E2247.
158.
WallisW. D. (1930). Culture and Progress. New York: McGraw-Hill.
159.
WatsonP. (1995). Archaeology, anthropology, and the culture concept. American Anthropologist, 97, 683–694.
160.
WestermarckE. (1922). The history of human marriage (vol. 2). New York, NY: Macmillan.
161.
WimsattW. C. (1975). Complexity and organization. In GreneM.MendelsohmE. (Eds.), Topics in the philosophy of biology (pp. 174–193). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.
162.
WimsattW. C. (1999). Genes memes and cultural heredity. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 279–310.
163.
WimsattW. C. (2013). Entrenchment and scaffolding: An architecture for a theory of cultural change. In CaporaelL. R.GriesemerJ. R.WimsattW. C. (Eds.), Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture, and cognition (pp. 77–105). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
164.
WimsattW. C. (2015). Entrenchment as a theoretical tool in evolutionary developmental biology. In LoveA. (Ed.), Conceptual change in biology (Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science) (pp. 365–402). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
165.
WimsattW. C.GriesemerJ. R. (2007). Reproducing entrenchments to scaffold culture: The central role of development in cultural evolution. In SansomR.BrandonR. N. (Eds.), Integrating evolution and development: From theory to practice (pp. 227–323). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
166.
WolfA. (1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
167.
WolfA. (2014). Incest avoidance and the incest taboos. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
